Magnetization pinning in modulated nanowires: from topological protection to the “corkscrew” mechanism
Source abstract
Abstract
Diameter-modulated nanowires offer an important paradigm to design the magnetization response of 3D magnetic nanostructures by engineering the domain wall pinning. With the aim to understand its nature and to control the process, we analyze the magnetization response in FeCo periodically modulated polycrystalline nanowires varying the minor segment diameter. Our modelling indicates a very complex behavior with a strong dependence on the disorder distribution and an important role of topologically non-trivial magnetization structures. We demonstrate that modulated nanowires with a small diameter difference are characterized by an increased coercive field in comparison to the straight ones, which is explained by a formation of topologically protected walls formed by two 3D skyrmions with opposite chiralities. For a large diameter difference we report the occurrence of a novel pinning type called here the "corkscrew": the magnetization of the large diameter segment forms a skyrmion tube with a core position in a helical modulation along the nanowire. This structure is pinned at the constriction and in order to penetrate the narrow segments the vortex/skyrmion core size should be reduced.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid
CSIC
Madrid
Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad · European Social Fund
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Parkin · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 19510.1038/nnano.2015.41 ↗
2. Magnetic Nano- and Microwires , ed. M. Vázquez , Woodhead Publishing , 2015 , vol. 1 , ISBN 978-0-08-100164-6
3. Ivanov · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 48500110.1088/0022-3727/46/48/485001 ↗
4. Hertel · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 483002
5. Viñas · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 41570410.1088/0957-4484/26/41/415704 ↗
6. Chandra Sekhar · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 8391310.1063/1.4867004 ↗
7. Palmero · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 46100110.1088/0957-4484/26/46/461001 ↗
8. Pitzschel · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 3390710.1063/1.3544036 ↗
9. Pitzschel · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 346310.1021/nn900909q ↗
10. Rodríguez · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 966910.1021/acsnano.6b05496 ↗
11. Salem · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 394110.1039/c3nr00633f ↗
12. Berganza · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2970210.1038/srep29702 ↗
13. Pereira · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 503310.1039/C4CP05665E ↗
14. Ivanov · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 532610.1021/acsnano.6b01337 ↗
15. Berganza · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 4 · 978
16. Bran · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 4390810.1063/1.4816479 ↗
17. Bran · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 14530410.1088/0022-3727/48/14/145304 ↗
18. Allende · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2009 · 80 · 17440210.1103/PhysRevB.80.174402 ↗
19. Arzuza · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 432 · 30910.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.071 ↗
20. Tejo · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17D13610.1063/1.4865777 ↗
21. Chandra Sekhar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 110.1063/1.4758469 ↗
22. Hubert · J. Phys., Colloq. · 1988 · 49 · 185910.1051/jphyscol:19888849 ↗
23. Arrott · IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 110.1109/LMAG.2016.2631127 ↗
24. Fert · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2017 · 2 · 1703110.1038/natrevmats.2017.31 ↗
25. Vivas · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 10570310.1088/0957-4484/24/10/105703 ↗
26. Vansteenkiste · AIP Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 10713310.1063/1.4899186 ↗
27. Rybakov · New J. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 4500210.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045002 ↗