journal article·2015

Charge transfer between carbon nanotubes on surfaces

Karolline A. S. Araujo, Ana P. M. Barboza, Thales F. D. Fernandes, Nitzan Shadmi, Ernesto Joselevich, Mario S. C. Mazzoni, Bernardo R. A. Neves

Nanoscale· Volume 7· Issue 39
Publisher page

Abstract

The charge transfer between neighboring single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) on a silicon oxide surface was investigated as a function of both the SWNT nature (metallic or semiconducting) and the anode/cathode distance using scanning probe techniques. Two main mechanisms were observed: a direct electron tunneling described by the typical Fowler-Nordheim model, and indirect electron transfer (hopping) mediated by functional groups on the supporting surface. Both mechanisms depend on the SWNT nature and on the anode/cathode separation: direct electron tunneling dominates the charge transfer process for metallic SWNTs, especially for large distances, while both mechanisms compete with each other for semiconducting SWNTs, prevailing one over the other depending on the anode/cathode separation. These mechanisms may significantly influence the design and operation of SWNT-based electronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Física

ICEx

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais

Department of Materials and Interfaces

Weizmann Institute of Science

Rehovot, Israel

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Genereux · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 164210.1021/cr900228f ↗
2. K. F. Brennan and A. S.Brown , Theory of modern electronic semiconductor devices , John Wiley , 200210.1002/0471224618 ↗
3. Seeman · Annu. Rev. Biochem. · 2010 · 79 · 6510.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-102244 ↗
4. A. Jorio , G.Dresselhaus and M. S.Dresselhaus , Carbon Nanotubes: Advanced Topics in the Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications , Springer Science & Business Media , 2007
5. Rinzler · Science · 1995 · 269 · 155010.1126/science.269.5230.1550 ↗
6. de Heer · Science · 1995 · 270 · 117910.1126/science.270.5239.1179 ↗
7. Saito · Nature · 1997 · 389 · 55410.1038/39221 ↗
8. Rao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 381310.1063/1.126790 ↗
9. Saito · Carbon · 2000 · 38 · 16910.1016/S0008-6223(99)00139-6 ↗
10. Fuhrer · Science · 2000 · 288 · 49410.1126/science.288.5465.494 ↗
11. Nirmalraj · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 389010.1021/nl9020914 ↗
12. Stadermann · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 69 · 20140210.1103/PhysRevB.69.201402 ↗
13. Fujiwara · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 199310.1063/1.1461901 ↗
14. Stadermann · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 72 · 24540610.1103/PhysRevB.72.245406 ↗
15. F. Arai , P. L. P.Liu , L. D. L.Dong and T.Fukuda , IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 2004. Proceedings. ICRA ‘04. 2004 , 2004 , 1 , 597–603
16. Shadmi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1404410.1021/jp5042603 ↗
17. Barboza · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 328710.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.028 ↗
18. Soares · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 504310.1021/nl103245q ↗
19. Barboza · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.256804 ↗
20. Zheng · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 106803-1
21. Gadzuk · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1973 · 45 · 48710.1103/RevModPhys.45.487 ↗
22. Filip · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. – Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2001 · 19 · 101610.1116/1.1349202 ↗
23. Bonard · Ultramicroscopy · 1998 · 73 · 710.1016/S0304-3991(97)00129-0 ↗
24. Wang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 330810.1063/1.119146 ↗
25. R. Gomer , Field Emission and Field Ionization , Harvard University Press , Cambridge , 1961 , p. 195
26. Collins · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 1997 · 55 · 939110.1103/PhysRevB.55.9391 ↗
27. Bonard · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 1999 · 69 · 24510.1007/s003390050998 ↗
28. Carroll · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 281110.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2811 ↗
29. Zhou · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 09550410.1103/PhysRevLett.87.095504 ↗
30. Bonard · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 144110.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1441 ↗
31. Liang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02760210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.027602 ↗
32. Bonard · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 91810.1063/1.122037 ↗
33. Tsu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1973 · 22 · 56210.1063/1.1654509 ↗
34. Kohn · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
35. Troullier · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 1991 · 43 · 886110.1103/PhysRevB.43.8861 ↗
36. Kleinman · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 48 · 142510.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1425 ↗
37. Soler · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 2745 · 35
38. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
39. S. Datta , Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems , Cambridge University Press , 1997
40. B. I. Shklovskii and A. L.Efros , Electronic properties of doped semiconductors , Springer , Berlin, Heidelberg , 198410.1007/978-3-662-02403-4 ↗
41. Aparecido-Ferreira · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2011 · 84 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.84.024204 ↗
42. Xiang · Nat. Chem. · 2015 · 7 · 22110.1038/nchem.2183 ↗