journal article·2022

Comment on “Realization of the Zn 3+ oxidation state” by H. Fang, H. Banjade, Deepika and P. Jena, Nanoscale , 2021, 13 , 14041–14048

Yunlong Shang, Na Shu, Zhoujie Zhang, Pu Yang, Jiawei Xu

Nanoscale· Volume 14· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Two zinc-boron clusters (ZnBeB11(CN)12 and ZnBeB23(CN)22) reported in a theoretical study by P. Jena and co-workers are reinvestigated using quantum chemistry calculations. The results prove that the zinc atoms in these two clusters retain a normal oxidation state of +2, overturning the conclusion reached in the previous study that a +3 oxidation state is present. The semi-empirical LOBA method points out this contrast, which is demonstrated via various wavefunction analysis approaches. No unpaired electrons are observed on zinc atoms nor is there a spin density difference distribution, revealing that the zinc atoms have a fully occupied 3d10 electron shell. Density of states studies give the same conclusion, and they further show that zinc atoms adopt an sp2-hybrid type during bonding. From the perspective of energy, we advise that the electron affinity energy is not a reliable way of evaluating the oxidation state. Instead, binding energy calculations and constrained DFT are applicable, and these also support the presence of Zn2+. The simulated XPS peaks are consistent with the experimental data for Zn(II) measured in ZnS. Lastly, the ETS-NOCV method is adopted to give insights into the bonding structures between zinc atoms and boron clusters. It is suggested that future theoretical research into similar problems is analyzed more cautiously to avoid potentially misleading other researchers.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · 2D Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Numerical Simulation of Large-Scale Complex System (NSLSCS) and School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Taicang Mingde Senior High School, Suzhou 215433, China

State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter (FJIRSM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China

School of Chemical Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 302 · 23110.1016/S0009-2614(99)00147-5 ↗
2. Kim · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 14430910.1063/1.3497189 ↗
3. Hrobarik · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 863110.1002/anie.200802233 ↗
4. Wang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 837110.1002/anie.200703710 ↗
5. Samanta · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 840010.1021/ja3029119 ↗
6. Schlöder · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1197710.1021/ja3052409 ↗
7. Fang · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1404110.1039/D1NR02816B ↗
8. Zhao · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2017 · 56 · 1342110.1002/anie.201706764 ↗
9. Zhao · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2016 · 55 · 370410.1002/anie.201600275 ↗
10. Fabian · Dyes Pigm. · 2010 · 84 · 3610.1016/j.dyepig.2009.06.008 ↗
11. Manzetti · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 7819210.1039/C5RA17148B ↗
12. Tao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.146401 ↗
13. Perdew · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 120 · 689810.1063/1.1665298 ↗
14. Weigend · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 7 · 329710.1039/b508541a ↗
15. Weigend · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 105710.1039/b515623h ↗
16. Grimme · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
17. Grimme · J. Comput. Chem. · 2011 · 32 · 145610.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
18. Lu · J. Comput. Chem. · 2012 · 33 · 58010.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
19. Thom · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 1129710.1039/b915364k ↗
20. Valiev · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2010 · 181 · 147710.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 ↗
21. Humphrey · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
22. Reeves · J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 141 · 02430510.1063/1.4886406 ↗
23. Ramos-Cordoba · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2015 · 11 · 150110.1021/ct501088v ↗
24. Xu · Inorg. Chem. · 2021 · 60 · 1187810.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00975 ↗
25. Pipek · J. Chem. Phys. · 1989 · 90 · 491610.1063/1.456588 ↗
26. Lu · Acta Chim. Sin. · 2011 · 69 · 2393
27. Davidson · Theor. Chim. Acta · 1992 · 83 · 31910.1007/BF01113058 ↗
28. Riera-Galindo · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3798110.1021/acsami.9b12441 ↗
29. Dougan · Sci. China, Ser. B: Chem. · 2009 · 52 · 208310.1007/s11426-009-0199-4 ↗
30. Hirshfeld · Theor. Chim. Acta · 1977 · 44 · 12910.1007/BF00549096 ↗
31. Krieck · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 297710.1021/ja808524y ↗
32. Yang · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2018 · 122 · 988610.1021/acs.jpca.8b10588 ↗
33. Gu · Int. J. Quantum Chem. · 2020 · 120 · e2608710.1002/qua.26087 ↗
34. Akola · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1999 · 60 · R1129710.1103/PhysRevB.60.R11297 ↗
35. Tozer · J. Chem. Phys. · 1998 · 109 · 1018010.1063/1.477711 ↗
36. Deroubaix · Surf. Interface Anal. · 1992 · 18 · 3910.1002/sia.740180107 ↗
37. Mitoraj · J. Mol. Model · 2011 · 17 · 233710.1007/s00894-011-1023-6 ↗
38. Mitoraj · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2009 · 5 · 96210.1021/ct800503d ↗
39. Mitoraj · J. Mol. Model · 2007 · 13 · 34710.1007/s00894-006-0149-4 ↗
40. Michalak · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2008 · 112 · 193310.1021/jp075460u ↗
41. Ziegler · Theor. Chim. Acta · 1977 · 46 · 110.1007/BF02401406 ↗
42. Xu · Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. · 2020 · 36 · 2157