Commensurability between protein nanotubes in contractile ejection nanomachines
Source abstract
Abstract
Contractile ejection nanomachines being sheath-tube assemblies create an opening in the cell membrane to translocate molecules or ions across it. Here, on the most structurally investigated examples of the bacteriophage T4 tail and pyocin R2, we show that the rearrangement of the sheath structure resulting in its contraction and twist occurs in such a way that the contracted sheath becomes commensurate with the inner tube. This fact dictates the previously unknown simple geometrical relationship between the nanotube symmetries. Using the Frank and van der Merwe classical theory of commensurability, we study an interaction between two protein nanotubes forming such nanomachines and obtain an expression for the corresponding energy, which depends on the tube structures and their mutual arrangement. The appearance of commensurability between the contracted sheath and the inner tube decreases both the interaction energy and the total energy of the system. It improves the nanomachine efficiency, since the energy gain obtained increases the torque of the inner tube piercing the cell membrane.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · Protein Structure and Dynamics · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Physics
Southern Federal University
344090 Rostov-on-Don
Russia
Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
UMR 5221 CNRS and Université de Montpellier
34095 Montpellier
France
Funding
Russian Science Foundation
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Taylor · Nature · 2016 · 533 · 34610.1038/nature17971 ↗
2. Leiman · Cell · 2004 · 118 · 41910.1016/j.cell.2004.07.022 ↗
3. Kostyuchenko · Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. · 2005 · 12 · 81010.1038/nsmb975 ↗
4. Basler · Nature · 2012 · 483 · 18210.1038/nature10846 ↗
5. French · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1209510.1073/pnas.1107183108 ↗
6. Ge · Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. · 2015 · 22 · 37710.1038/nsmb.2995 ↗
7. Bönemann · Mol. Microbiol. · 2010 · 76 · 81510.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07171.x ↗
8. Russell · Nat. Rev. Microbiol. · 2014 · 12 · 13710.1038/nrmicro3185 ↗
9. Michel-Briand · Biochimie · 2002 · 84 · 49910.1016/S0300-9084(02)01422-0 ↗
10. Fokine · Structure · 2007 · 15 · 109910.1016/j.str.2007.07.008 ↗
11. Kageyama · J. Biochem · 1964 · 55 · 5910.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a127841 ↗
12. Williams · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2008 · 74 · 386810.1128/AEM.00141-08 ↗
13. Scholl · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 2009 · 53 · 307410.1128/AAC.01660-08 ↗
14. Ritchie · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 2011 · 55 · 546910.1128/AAC.05031-11 ↗
15. Kanamaru · Nature · 2002 · 415 · 55310.1038/415553a ↗
16. Bak · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1982 · 45 · 58710.1088/0034-4885/45/6/001 ↗
17. Frank · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 1949 · 198 · 21610.1098/rspa.1949.0096 ↗
18. Wilson · Adv. Phys. · 1975 · 24 · 11710.1080/00018737500101391 ↗
19. Pynn · Nature · 1979 · 281 · 43310.1038/281433a0 ↗
20. W. C. Koehler , Magnetic structures of rare earth metals and alloys , in Magnetic properties of rare earth metals , Springer , US , 1972 , pp. 81–128
21. Rochal · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1697610.1039/C6NR04930C ↗
22. Caspar · Biophys. J. · 1980 · 32 · 10310.1016/S0006-3495(80)84929-0 ↗
23. Brackmann · Trends Cell Biol. · 2017 · 27 · 62310.1016/j.tcb.2017.05.003 ↗
24. Rubinstein · J. Math. Phys. · 1970 · 11 · 25810.1063/1.1665057 ↗
25. Maghsood · Biophys. J. · 2017 · 113 · 19510.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.029 ↗
26. Shikuma · Science · 2014 · 343 · 52910.1126/science.1246794 ↗