journal article·2017Open access

Site accessibility tailors DNA cleavage by restriction enzymes in DNA confined monolayers

Chiara Rotella, Giovanni Doni, Alessandro Bosco, Matteo Castronovo, Alessandro De Vita, Loredana Casalis, Giovanni M. Pavan, Pietro Parisse

Nanoscale· Volume 9· Issue 19

Abstract

Density-tunable nanografted monolayers (NAMs) of short oligonucleotide sequences on gold surfaces show novel properties that make them suitable for advanced biosensing applications, and in particular to study the effects of crowding and confinement on biomolecular interactions. Here, combining atomic force microscopy nanolithography, topography measurements and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated restriction enzyme reaction mechanisms within confined DNA brushes highlighting the role played by the DNA sequence conformation and restriction site position along the chain, respectively, in determining the accessibility of the enzyme, and its consequent cleavage efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Miyoshi · Biochimie · 2008 · 90 · 104010.1016/j.biochi.2008.02.009 ↗
2. Akabayov · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 161510.1038/ncomms2620 ↗
3. Zhou · Annu. Rev. Biophys. · 2008 · 37 · 37510.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817 ↗
4. Tabaka · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2014 · 42 · 72710.1093/nar/gkt907 ↗
5. Nakano · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 273310.1021/cr400113m ↗
6. Spruijt · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 40610.1038/nnano.2014.110 ↗
7. Watkins · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 892310.1021/ja411486g ↗
8. Lei · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 921710.1038/srep09217 ↗
9. Josephs · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 365310.1021/nn400659m ↗
10. Mahshid · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 1559610.1021/jacs.5b04942 ↗
11. Del Grosso · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 840710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04566 ↗
12. Metzker · Nat. Rev. Genet. · 2010 · 11 · 3110.1038/nrg2626 ↗
13. Heyman · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 37410.1038/nnano.2012.65 ↗
14. Eid · Science · 2009 · 323 · 13310.1126/science.1162986 ↗
15. Zhou · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 389710.1021/ac200422u ↗
16. Buxboim · Mol. Syst. Biol. · 2008 · 4 · 18110.1038/msb.2008.20 ↗
17. Buxboim · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 90910.1021/nl8039124 ↗
18. Castronovo · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 29710.1038/ncomms1296 ↗
19. Castronovo · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 414010.1021/nl802370g ↗
20. Biagiotti · Anal. Bioanal. Chem. · 2012 · 402 · 41310.1007/s00216-011-5361-0 ↗
21. Parisse · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 353210.1021/jz3018682 ↗
22. Solano · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 2877410.1039/C5CP04028K ↗
23. Bosco · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 173410.1039/c2nr11662f ↗
24. Nkoua Ngavouka · Macromolecules · 2014 · 47 · 874810.1021/ma501712a ↗
25. Hinckley · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139 · 14490310.1063/1.4822042 ↗
26. Doni · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 998810.1039/c3nr01799k ↗
27. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗