journal article·2010

The impact of erbium incorporation on the structure and photophysics of silicon–germanium nanowires

Ji Wu, Monika Wieligor, T. Waldek Zerda, Jeffery L. Coffer

Nanoscale· Volume 2· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, we report multi-step processes for the fabrication of Er3+-doped SiGe nanowires (NWs) and characterization of their emissive properties. Three different alloyed architectures are obtained by altering the deposition sequences of Si and Er3+ on a Ge core NW, each involving a fixed concentration of these three elements. The deposition of Si onto the Ge NW core, followed by an Er3+-rich layer on the outermost surface, permits facile formation of a SiGe alloy given the lack of an erbium diffusion barrier; yet clustering of the erbium centers on the NW surface produces the weakest emitter. For nanowires prepared by co-depositing Si and Er3+ on top of the Ge core, the presence of impurity Er3+ ions greatly reduces the alloying rate of Si and Ge such that less Si can diffuse into the Ge core. For this structure, the reduction of Er-Er interactions by a polycrystalline Si shell results in the strongest emission at 1540 nm. If an Er3+ layer is inserted between the Ge and Si layers (a sandwich structure), it is found that Er3+ ions diffuse preferentially into the SiGe core instead of the silicon-rich shell, with a correspondingly weaker luminescence intensity. A combination of high resolution transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray mapping, micro-Raman spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectroscopy are employed to derive these conclusions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Dehlinger · Science · 2000 · 290 · 227710.1126/science.290.5500.2277 ↗
2. Myronov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 314510.1063/1.1804236 ↗
3. Naveed · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 15 · 9110.1088/0268-1242/15/2/302 ↗
4. Telford · III-Vs Review · 2004 · 17 · 32
5. Borak · Science · 2005 · 308 · 63810.1126/science.1109831 ↗
6. Lynch · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 154310.1063/1.1501759 ↗
7. Lee · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 011101-1
8. Lieber · MRS Bull. · 2003 · 28 · 48610.1557/mrs2003.144 ↗
9. John · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1999 · 121 · 188810.1021/ja982838g ↗
10. Senter · Nano Lett. · 2001 · 1 · 38310.1021/nl015546d ↗
11. John · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 163510.1063/1.1309022 ↗
12. Ji · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 64310.1088/0957-4484/15/5/041 ↗
13. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 130310.1021/nl025771a ↗
14. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 249710.1021/jp036170q ↗
15. Wu · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 144410.1002/adma.200400162 ↗
16. Hanrath · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1546610.1021/ja0465808 ↗
17. Carey · J. Lumin. · 1998 · 80 · 29710.1016/S0022-2313(98)00115-X ↗
18. Kenyon · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 20 · R6510.1088/0268-1242/20/12/R02 ↗
19. Shin · Solid State Commun. · 2000 · 114 · 50510.1016/S0038-1098(00)00111-3 ↗
20. Brya · Solid State Commun. · 1973 · 12 · 25310.1016/0038-1098(73)90692-3 ↗
21. Lu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 320910.1021/jp074764d ↗
22. Choi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 44410.1063/1.1423388 ↗
23. Yin · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2003 · 765 · D4.7.110.1557/PROC-765-D4.7/G1.7 ↗
24. Krasil'nikova · Phys. Solid State · 2005 · 47 · 9310.1134/1.1853453 ↗
25. Teo · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 2171610.1021/jp052984q ↗
26. Polman · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2004 · 21 · 87110.1364/JOSAB.21.000871 ↗
27. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 67 · 218210.1063/1.115096 ↗
28. Coffa · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 1994 · 49 · 1631310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16313 ↗
29. Priolo · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 78 · 387410.1063/1.359904 ↗