Ultra-low noise measurements of ionic transport within individual single-walled carbon nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite 15 years of extensive investigation, the fabrication and study of nanofluidic devices that incorporate a single carbon nanotube (CNT) still represents a remarkable experimental challenge. In this study, we present the fabrication of nanofluidic devices that integrate an individual single-walled CNT (SWCNT), showcasing a notable reduction in noise by 1-3 orders of magnitude compared to conventional devices. This achievement was made possible by employing high dielectric constant materials for both the substrate and the CNT-covering layer. Furthermore, we provide a detailed account of the crucial factors contributing to the successful fabrication of SWCNT-based nanofluidic devices that are reliably leak-free, plug-free, and long-lived. Key considerations include the quality of the substrate-layer interface, the nanotube opening, and the effective removal of photoresist residues and trapped microbubbles. We demonstrate that these devices, characterized by a high signal-to-noise ratio, enable spectral noise analysis of ionic transport through an individual SWCNT, thus showing that SWCNTs obey Hooge's law in 1/f at low frequencies. Beyond advancing our fundamental understanding of ion transport in SWCNTs, these ultralow-noise measurements open avenues for leveraging SWCNTs in nanopore sensing applications for single-molecule detection, offering high sensitivity and identification capabilities.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire Charles Coulomb (L2C), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, 8, Gagarin ave, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IRIG-MEM, 38000, Grenoble, France
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (LPT UMR 5152), Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier, CNRS, 31062 Toulouse, France
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Université de Montpellier · Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · Nature · 2017 · 543 · 23410.1038/nature21051 ↗
2. Manghi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 2294310.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08202 ↗
3. Liu · Science · 2010 · 327 · 6410.1126/science.1181799 ↗
4. Yazda · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1197610.1039/C7NR02976D ↗
5. Pang · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 727710.1021/nn202115s ↗
6. Amiri · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 120410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04967 ↗
7. Secchi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 15450110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.154501 ↗
8. Manghi · Phys. Rev. E · 2018 · 98 · 01260510.1103/PhysRevE.98.012605 ↗
9. Gravelle · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 726510.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02858 ↗
10. Hoogerheide · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 25680410.1103/PhysRevLett.102.256804 ↗
11. Hooge · Phys. Lett. A · 1970 · 33 · 16910.1016/0375-9601(70)90713-9 ↗
12. Robin · Faraday Discuss. · 2023 · 246 · 55610.1039/D3FD00035D ↗
13. Smeets · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 41710.1073/pnas.0705349105 ↗
14. Fragasso · Nanotechnology · 2019 · 30 · 39520210.1088/1361-6528/ab2d35 ↗
15. Su · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 897510.1039/C9NR09829A ↗
16. Tasserit · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 26060210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.260602 ↗
17. Fragasso · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 133810.1021/acsnano.9b09353 ↗
18. Lee · Science · 2010 · 329 · 132010.1126/science.1193383 ↗
19. Cui · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 229510.1038/s41467-023-37970-3 ↗
20. Zhu · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 446710.1038/s41467-019-12519-5 ↗
21. Xiao · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 431110.1021/nl9025488 ↗
22. Schneider · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 191210.1021/nl1008037 ↗
23. Jain · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 105310.1038/nnano.2015.222 ↗
24. Balme · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1013510.1038/srep10135 ↗
25. Falk · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 406710.1021/nl1021046 ↗
26. Cheng · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 316510.1021/nl071770c ↗
27. Stein · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 03590110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035901 ↗
28. Goldman · J. Gen. Physiol. · 1943 · 27 · 3710.1085/jgp.27.1.37 ↗
29. Hodgkin · J. Physiol. · 1949 · 108 · 3710.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310 ↗
30. Zhang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2024 · 146 · 11036
31. Teorell · Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. · 1935 · 33 · 28210.3181/00379727-33-8339C ↗
32. Meyer · Helv. Chim. Acta · 1936 · 19 · 64910.1002/hlca.19360190199 ↗
33. Westermann-Clark · J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. · 1986 · 198 · 21310.1016/0022-0728(86)90001-X ↗
34. Galama · J. Membr. Sci. Res. · 2016 · 2 · 128
35. Liang · Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. · 2020 · 3 · 910.1016/j.npe.2019.12.008 ↗
36. Kumar · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 49550310.1088/0957-4484/24/49/495503 ↗
37. de Vreede · Nanotechnology · 2019 · 30 · 26530110.1088/1361-6528/ab0e2a ↗
38. Tröbs · Measurement · 2006 · 39 · 12010.1016/j.measurement.2005.10.010 ↗
39. Wen · ACS Sens. · 2017 · 2 · 30010.1021/acssensors.6b00826 ↗
40. Liu · IEEE Sens. J. · 2023 · 24 · 240510.1109/JSEN.2023.3344180 ↗
41. Uram · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 85710.1021/nn700322m ↗
42. Lee · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 744810.1038/srep07448 ↗