journal article·2024Open access

Effects of radiation damage on the yielding and fracture of nanowires

Daniel Vizoso, Rémi Dingreville

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Since free surfaces act as perfect sinks for radiation-induced defects, nanowires, owing to their high surface-to-volume ratio, are considered to be radiation tolerant. But the question remains on how this tolerance translates to their yielding and fracture behavior. Atomistic simulations of irradiated gold nanowires reported here show the existence of a size regime where the yield stress is affected by the accumulation of radiation damage. Our analysis also shows that, regardless of the diameter of the nanowire, early on during tensile loading, much of the radiation-induced defect content initially present in the wire is rapidly cleaned by the motion of pre-existing dislocations as well as dislocations emitted from the surface of the wire. This defect removal process resets the crystallographic configuration of the wire which subsequently deforms and fractures via the same mechanisms that occur in pristine, un-irradiated nanowires. We conclude that the fracture behavior of nanowires in the size and dose regimes tested is unaffected by radiation damage.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Sandia National Laboratories, 1515 Eubank Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA

Funding

National Nuclear Security Administration · Basic Energy Sciences

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Kang · Int. J. Plast. · 2010 · 26 · 138710.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.001 ↗
2. Ryu · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2011 · 59 · 171710.1016/j.jmps.2011.06.003 ↗
3. Peng · Small · 2012 · 8 · 188910.1002/smll.201101911 ↗
4. Wang · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2014 · 16 · 275210.1007/s11051-014-2752-0 ↗
5. Sainath · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 104 · 7610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.053 ↗
6. Cao · Nanotechnology · 2018 · 29 · 29570310.1088/1361-6528/aac046 ↗
7. Ojeda · Extreme Mech. Lett. · 2022 · 57 · 10189610.1016/j.eml.2022.101896 ↗
8. Zhao · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2023 · 173 · 10521010.1016/j.jmps.2023.105210 ↗
9. Lu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 398210.1002/adfm.201101224 ↗
10. Park · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2005 · 72 · 05410610.1103/PhysRevB.72.054106 ↗
11. Sun · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2015 · 634 · 8610.1016/j.msea.2015.03.034 ↗
12. Mehrez · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1997 · 56 · 1263210.1103/PhysRevB.56.12632 ↗
13. Zhang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 130 · 08510510.1063/5.0060136 ↗
14. Beets · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 185 · 25710.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.008 ↗
15. Bringa · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 335110.1021/nl201383u ↗
16. Sun · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 95 · 15610.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.003 ↗
17. Liu · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2017 · 405 · 2210.1016/j.nimb.2017.05.016 ↗
18. Shang · Nanotechnology · 2018 · 29 · 21570810.1088/1361-6528/aab537 ↗
19. Vizoso · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 215 · 11701810.1016/j.actamat.2021.117018 ↗
20. Vizoso · Scr. Mater. · 2023 · 226 · 11522610.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115226 ↗
21. G. S.Was , Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys , Springer , 2016
22. Jia · Nanomaterials · 2022 · 12 · 61110.3390/nano12040611 ↗
23. Wei-Na · Chin. Phys. B · 2014 · 23 · 03610110.1088/1674-1056/23/3/036101 ↗
24. Li · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2013 · 307 · 15810.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.013 ↗
25. Yang · Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. · 2013 · 56 · 498
26. Thompson · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2022 · 271 · 10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
27. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
28. Foiles · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1988 · 37 · 1037810.1103/PhysRevB.37.10378 ↗
29. Chen · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2019 · 32 · 045402
30. Deo · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2021 · 30 · 02300110.1088/1361-651X/ac2f83 ↗
31. Stukowski · JOM · 2014 · 66 · 39910.1007/s11837-013-0827-5 ↗
32. Stukowski · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 015102
33. Stukowski · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 20 · 08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
34. Dingreville · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2005 · 53 · 182710.1016/j.jmps.2005.02.012 ↗
35. Dingreville · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2008 · 16 · 02500210.1088/0965-0393/16/2/025002 ↗
36. Volkert · Philos. Mag. · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
37. Kim · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 524510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.027 ↗
38. Seo · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 511210.1021/nl402282n ↗
39. Hwang · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 1565710.1039/C5NR03902A ↗
40. Wu · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 52510.1038/nmat1403 ↗
41. Zhu · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2012 · 85 · 04544310.1103/PhysRevB.85.045443 ↗
42. Greer · Appl. Phys. A · 2005 · 80 · 162510.1007/s00339-005-3204-6 ↗
43. Figueroa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 467 · 67710.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.10.036 ↗
44. Stangebye · Nano Lett. · 2023 · 23 · 328210.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00180 ↗
45. Khraishi · Metall. Mater. Trans. B · 2002 · 33 · 28510.1007/s11663-002-0012-7 ↗
46. Robach · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 95510.1080/0141861031000065329 ↗
47. Kacher · Micron · 2012 · 43 · 109910.1016/j.micron.2012.01.017 ↗