journal article·2024Open access

Tunable 2-D magnonic crystals: effect of packing density

C. Tian, A. O. Adeyeye

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Magnonic crystals, periodic arrays of magnetic structures, have emerged as a promising platform for manipulating and controlling spin waves in magnetic materials. Magnetic antidot nanostructures, representing 2-D magnonic crystals, are versatile platforms for controlling and manipulating magnons. In this work, we systematically investigate the effects of inter-hole spacing and lattice (rhombic and honeycomb) arrangements on the dynamic properties of Ni80Fe20 antidot structures. The dynamic responses of antidot lattices of fixed hole diameter (d = 280 nm) and inter-hole spacing (s) between 90 and 345 nm are investigated using broadband ferromagnetic spectroscopy. Multiple resonance modes sensitive to s are observed due to the inhomogeneous internal field distribution induced by the presence of holes. There is a marked variation in mode frequency, mode intensity and the number of modes for rhombic antidot lattice as the inter-hole spacing and applied field direction are varied. Our experimental results are in good agreement with micromagnetic simulations. Our findings may find application in the design of magnonic-based devices.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576, Singapore

Department of Physics, Durham University, South Rd, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

Funding

Royal Society

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Chumak · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 24400110.1088/1361-6463/aa6a65 ↗
2. Wang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 08311210.1063/1.3089839 ↗
3. Barman · J. Phys.: Condens.Matter · 2021 · 33 · 413001
4. Wang · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 64310.1021/nn901171u ↗
5. Neusser · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 292710.1002/adma.200900809 ↗
6. Tacchi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 12720410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.127204 ↗
7. Mandal · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 339710.1021/nn300421c ↗
8. Kumar · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 02391010.1063/1.4813228 ↗
9. Ding · Europhys. Lett. · 2012 · 98 · 1600410.1209/0295-5075/98/16004 ↗
10. Ding · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07D30410.1063/1.3535425 ↗
11. Neusser · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 06720810.1103/PhysRevLett.105.067208 ↗
12. Tacchi · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2012 · 86 · 01441710.1103/PhysRevB.86.014417 ↗
13. Bali · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2012 · 85 · 10441410.1103/PhysRevB.85.104414 ↗
14. Schwarze · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2012 · 85 · 13444810.1103/PhysRevB.85.134448 ↗
15. Martyanov · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2007 · 75 · 17442910.1103/PhysRevB.75.174429 ↗
16. Tacchi · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2010 · 46 · 144010.1109/TMAG.2009.2039775 ↗
17. Neusser · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 12250110.1063/1.2988290 ↗
18. Neusser · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2011 · 84 · 09445410.1103/PhysRevB.84.094454 ↗
19. Tacchi · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1036710.1038/srep10367 ↗
20. Sklenar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 15241210.1063/1.4802278 ↗
21. Adeyeye · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 15300110.1088/0022-3727/41/15/153001 ↗
22. M. J.Donahue and D. G.Porter , Interagency Report NISTIR 6376 , National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, MD , 1999