journal article·2023Open access

Controlling product selectivity in hybrid gas/liquid reactors using gas conditions, voltage, and temperature

Seung-Hoon Lee, Brandon Iglesias, Henry O. Everitt, Jie Liu

Nanoscale· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

For the conversion of CO2 into fuels and chemical feedstocks, hybrid gas/liquid-fed electrochemical flow reactors provide advantages in selectivity and production rates over traditional liquid phase reactors. However, fundamental questions remain about how to optimize conditions to produce desired products. Using an alkaline electrolyte to suppress hydrogen formation and a gas diffusion electrode catalyst composed of copper nanoparticles on carbon nanospikes, we investigate how hydrocarbon product selectivity in the CO2 reduction reaction in hybrid reactors depends on three experimentally controllable parameters: (1) supply of dry or humidified CO2 gas, (2) applied potential, and (3) electrolyte temperature. Changing from dry to humidified CO2 dramatically alters product selectivity from C2 products ethanol and acetic acid to ethylene and C1 products formic acid and methane. Water vapor evidently influences product selectivity of reactions that occur on the gas-facing side of the catalyst by adding a source of protons that alters reaction pathways and intermediates.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

Reactwell, L.L.C. 6501 Navigation Blvd, Houston, TX 77011, USA

U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory-South/Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA

Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Defense · Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education · Division of Chemistry

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Ross · Nat. Catal. · 2019 · 2 · 64810.1038/s41929-019-0306-7 ↗
2. Luna · Science · 2019 · 364 · eaav350610.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
3. Liu · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 63910.1021/acsenergylett.9b00137 ↗
4. Jouny · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 74810.1038/s41929-018-0133-2 ↗
5. Weng · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1697310.1039/C8CP01319E ↗
6. Alfath · Catalysts · 2020 · 10 · 85910.3390/catal10080859 ↗
7. Higgins · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 31710.1021/acsenergylett.8b02035 ↗
8. Dinh · Science · 2018 · 360 · 78310.1126/science.aas9100 ↗
9. Arquer · Science · 2020 · 367 · 66110.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
10. Ma · Nat. Catal. · 2020 · 3 · 47810.1038/s41929-020-0450-0 ↗
11. Nguyen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2020 · 49 · 748810.1039/D0CS00230E ↗
12. Birdja · Nat. Energy · 2019 · 4 · 73210.1038/s41560-019-0450-y ↗
13. Gao · Nat. Catal. · 2019 · 2 · 19810.1038/s41929-019-0235-5 ↗
14. Verma · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 707510.1039/C5CP05665A ↗
15. Kas · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1074810.1038/ncomms10748 ↗
16. Leonard · ChemSusChem · 2020 · 13 · 40010.1002/cssc.201902547 ↗
17. Lees · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2022 · 7 · 5510.1038/s41578-021-00356-2 ↗
18. Tan · Joule · 2020 · 4 · 110410.1016/j.joule.2020.03.013 ↗
19. Weekes · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2018 · 51 · 91010.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010 ↗
20. Dong · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2019 · 5 · 146110.1021/acscentsci.9b00519 ↗
21. Dinh · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 283510.1021/acsenergylett.8b01734 ↗
22. Reyes · ACS Energy Lett. · 2020 · 5 · 161210.1021/acsenergylett.0c00637 ↗
23. Ahn · Catal. Today · 2017 · 288 · 2410.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.028 ↗
24. Löwe · ChemElectroChem · 2019 · 6 · 449710.1002/celc.201900872 ↗
25. Hussain · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 524010.1021/acscatal.7b03308 ↗
26. Gao · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 960710.1039/C9CP06824D ↗
27. Lee · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 5 · 930910.1021/acsaem.2c02226 ↗
28. Song · ChemistrySelect · 2016 · 1 · 605510.1002/slct.201601169 ↗
29. Burdyny · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 144210.1039/C8EE03134G ↗
30. Ma · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 89210.1038/s41467-019-08805-x ↗
31. Li · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 368510.1038/s41467-020-17499-5 ↗
32. Luo · ACS Catal. · 2016 · 6 · 21910.1021/acscatal.5b01967 ↗
33. Garza · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 149010.1021/acscatal.7b03477 ↗
34. Sun · Chem · 2017 · 3 · 56010.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009 ↗
35. Zheng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 764610.1021/jacs.9b02124 ↗
36. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 352510.1021/jacs.9b12445 ↗
37. Luc · Nat. Catal. · 2019 · 2 · 42310.1038/s41929-019-0269-8 ↗
38. Hanselman · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 106210.1021/acsenergylett.8b00326 ↗
39. Fan · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 6 · eaay311110.1126/sciadv.aay3111 ↗
40. Schouten · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 986410.1021/ja302668n ↗
41. Lobaccaro · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 2677710.1039/C6CP05287H ↗