Switchable reinforced streptavidin
Source abstract
Abstract
The complex of the small molecule biotin and the homotetrameric protein streptavidin is key to a broad range of biotechnological applications. Therefore, the behavior of this extraordinarily high-affinity interaction under mechanical force is intensively studied by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Recently, steered molecular dynamics simulations have identified a low force pathway for the dissociation of biotin from streptavidin, which involves partial unfolding of the N-terminal β-sheet structure of monovalent streptavidin's functional subunit. Based on these results, we now introduced two mutations (T18C,A33C) in the functional subunit of monovalent streptavidin to establish a switchable connection (disulfide bridge) between the first two β-strands to prevent this unfolding. In atomic force microscopy-based single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments, we observed unbinding forces of about 350 pN (at a force-loading rate of 10 nN s-1) for pulling a single biotin out of an N-terminally anchored monovalent streptavidin binding pocket - about 1.5-fold higher compared with what has been reported for N-terminal force loading of native monovalent streptavidin. Upon addition of a reducing agent, the unbinding forces dropped back to 200 pN, as the disulfide bridge was destroyed. Switching from reducing to oxidizing buffer conditions, the inverse effect was observed. Our work illustrates how the mechanics of a receptor-ligand system can be tuned by engineering the receptor protein far off the ligand-binding pocket.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biotin and Related Studies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Click Chemistry and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lehrstuhl für Angewandte Physik and Center for NanoScience
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
80799 Munich
Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Green · Methods Enzymol. · 1990 · 184 · 5110.1016/0076-6879(90)84259-J ↗
2. Sano · J. Biol. Chem. · 1995 · 270 · 2820410.1074/jbc.270.36.21354 ↗
3. Krieg · Nat. Rev. Phys. · 2019 · 1 · 4110.1038/s42254-018-0001-7 ↗
4. Sitters · Nat. Methods · 2015 · 12 · 4710.1038/nmeth.3183 ↗
5. Ott · J. Struct. Biol. · 2017 · 197 · 310.1016/j.jsb.2016.02.011 ↗
6. Lof · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2019 · 116 · 1879810.1073/pnas.1901794116 ↗
7. Tych · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2018 · 122 · 1137310.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07301 ↗
8. Howarth · Nat. Methods · 2006 · 3 · 26710.1038/nmeth861 ↗
9. Sedlak · PLoS One · 2017 · 12 · e018872210.1371/journal.pone.0188722 ↗
10. Sedlak · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 341510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04045 ↗
11. Humphrey · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
12. Dombkowski · FEBS Lett. · 2014 · 588 · 20610.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.024 ↗
13. Li · J. Mol. Biol. · 2003 · 334 · 7510.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.036 ↗
14. Grutzner · Biophys. J. · 2009 · 97 · 82510.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.037 ↗
15. Sharma · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 927810.1073/pnas.0700351104 ↗
16. Nordlund · J. Biol. Chem. · 2003 · 278 · 247910.1074/jbc.M210721200 ↗
17. Chilkoti · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 69 · 212510.1016/S0006-3495(95)80083-4 ↗
18. Voss · Protein Eng., Des. Sel. · 1997 · 10 · 97510.1093/protein/10.8.975 ↗
19. Reznik · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1998 · 95 · 1352510.1073/pnas.95.23.13525 ↗
20. Korndorfer · Protein Sci. · 2002 · 11 · 88310.1110/ps.4150102 ↗
21. Chivers · Nat. Methods · 2010 · 7 · 39110.1038/nmeth.1450 ↗
22. Lim · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2013 · 110 · 5710.1002/bit.24605 ↗
23. DeMonte · Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. · 2013 · 81 · 162110.1002/prot.24320 ↗
24. Demonte · Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. · 2014 · 98 · 628510.1007/s00253-014-5682-y ↗
25. Fairhead · J. Mol. Biol. · 2014 · 426 · 19910.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.016 ↗
26. Milles · Science · 2018 · 359 · 152710.1126/science.aar2094 ↗
27. Milles · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2017 · 121 · 362010.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09593 ↗
28. Yin · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2005 · 102 · 1581510.1073/pnas.0507705102 ↗
29. Artimo · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2012 · 40 · W59710.1093/nar/gks400 ↗
30. Zimmermann · Nat. Protoc. · 2010 · 5 · 97510.1038/nprot.2010.49 ↗
31. Chen · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1139910.1073/pnas.1101046108 ↗
32. te Riet · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 165910.1016/j.ultramic.2011.09.012 ↗
33. Chilkoti · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 1062210.1021/ja00148a003 ↗
34. Sarter · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2020 · 124 · 32410.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08467 ↗
35. Baumann · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 8910.1038/nnano.2015.231 ↗
36. Erlich · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 40710.1039/C8NR08636B ↗
37. Durner · ACS Omega · 2017 · 2 · 306410.1021/acsomega.7b00478 ↗
38. Schwaiger · Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. · 2004 · 11 · 8110.1038/nsmb705 ↗
39. M. S. Bauer , L. F.Milles , S. M.Sedlak and H. E.Gaub , bioRxiv , 2018
40. Herman · Mol. Microbiol. · 2014 · 93 · 35610.1111/mmi.12663 ↗
41. Basu · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Struct. Biol. · 2019 · 75 · 26210.1107/S2059798319003103 ↗
42. Bustamante · Science · 1994 · 265 · 159910.1126/science.8079175 ↗
43. Sedlak · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 6 · eaay599910.1126/sciadv.aay5999 ↗