Stable micelles based on a mixture of coiled-coils: the role of different oligomeric states
Source abstract
Abstract
Homomeric micelles with tunable size, shape and stability have been extensively studied for biomedical applications such as drug carriers. However, designing the local valency and self-assembled morphology of nanophase-separated multicomponent micelles with varied ligand binding possibilities remains challenging. Here, we present micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic peptide-PEG-lipid hybrid conjugates, where the peptides can be either a 3-helix or 4-helix coiled-coil. We demonstrate that the micelle size and sphericity can be controlled based on the coiled-coil oligomeric state. Using theory and coarse-grained dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations in an explicit solvent simulation, we studied the distribution of 3-helix and 4-helix conjugates within the mixed micelles and observed self-organization into nanodomains within the mixed micelle. We discovered that the phase separation behavior is dictated by the geometry mismatch in the alkyl chain length from different coiled-coil oligomeric states. Our analyses of the self-assembly tendency and drug delivery potency of mixed micelles with controlled multivalency provide important insights into the assembly and formation of nanophase-separated micelles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Northwestern University
Evanston
USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Funding
Office of Naval Research Global
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. K. Greish , Cancer Nanotechnology: Methods and Protocols , 2010 , pp. 25–37
2. Iyer · Drug Discovery Today · 2006 · 11 · 81210.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.005 ↗
3. Maeda · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2010 · 21 · 79710.1021/bc100070g ↗
4. Maeda · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2013 · 65 · 7110.1016/j.addr.2012.10.002 ↗
5. Torchilin · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2011 · 63 · 13110.1016/j.addr.2010.03.011 ↗
6. Elias · Nanomedicine · 2013 · 9 · 19410.1016/j.nano.2012.05.015 ↗
7. Lee · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2005 · 23 · 151710.1038/nbt1171 ↗
8. Tang · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 801510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.091 ↗
9. Nicolas · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 114710.1039/C2CS35265F ↗
10. Mammen · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 1998 · 37 · 275410.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
11. Rao · Science · 1998 · 280 · 70810.1126/science.280.5364.708 ↗
12. Saul · J. Controlled Release · 2006 · 114 · 27710.1016/j.jconrel.2006.05.028 ↗
13. Ashley · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 38910.1038/nmat2992 ↗
14. Müllner · Polymer · 2016 · 98 · 38910.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.076 ↗
15. Ackerman · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 424010.1021/jp511083z ↗
16. Bacia · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2005 · 102 · 327210.1073/pnas.0408215102 ↗
17. Chiantia · Biophys. J. · 2012 · 103 · 231110.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.033 ↗
18. Hammond · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2005 · 102 · 632010.1073/pnas.0405654102 ↗
19. Parthasarathy · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 509510.1021/la060390o ↗
20. Shi · Biophys. J. · 2005 · 89 · 238510.1529/biophysj.105.063784 ↗
21. García-Sáez · J. Biol. Chem. · 2007 · 282 · 3353710.1074/jbc.M706162200 ↗
22. Heberle · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 685310.1021/ja3113615 ↗
23. Ang · Biomacromolecules · 2016 · 17 · 326210.1021/acs.biomac.6b00986 ↗
24. Dong · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 532010.1021/nn301142r ↗
25. Dong · Biomacromolecules · 2015 · 16 · 74310.1021/bm501659w ↗
26. Dong · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1180710.1021/ja3048128 ↗
27. Dube · Biomacromolecules · 2014 · 15 · 296310.1021/bm5005788 ↗
28. Dube · Biomacromolecules · 2013 · 14 · 369710.1021/bm4010518 ↗
29. Ma · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1933410.1039/C6NR07125B ↗
30. Seo · J. Controlled Release · 2015 · 220 · 5110.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.057 ↗
31. Hamed · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 1 · 7910.1021/ab500088b ↗
32. Hamed · BioNanoScience · 2015 · 5 · 14010.1007/s12668-015-0172-y ↗
33. Hamed · Biomacromolecules · 2013 · 14 · 405310.1021/bm401164t ↗
34. Ang · Biomacromolecules · 2017 · 18 · 357210.1021/acs.biomac.7b00917 ↗
35. Groot · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 1126510.1063/1.1574800 ↗
36. Groot · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 442310.1063/1.474784 ↗
37. Li · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2013 · 110 · 1229510.1073/pnas.1222276110 ↗
38. Yue · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 319610.1021/nn205125e ↗
39. Li · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 1663110.1039/C5NR02970H ↗
40. Groot · Biophys. J. · 2001 · 81 · 72510.1016/S0006-3495(01)75737-2 ↗
41. Phillips · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 178110.1002/jcc.20289 ↗
42. Jorgensen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
43. MacKerell Jr. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 358610.1021/jp973084f ↗
44. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
45. Harkness · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 1055410.1002/anie.201102882 ↗
46. Merz · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 987110.1021/acsnano.6b02091 ↗
47. Daoud · J. Phys. · 1982 · 43 · 53110.1051/jphys:01982004303053100 ↗
48. Illya · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 11471010.1063/1.2353114 ↗
49. Laradji · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 123 · 22490210.1063/1.2102894 ↗
50. Bruce · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 378810.1021/jp013616z ↗
51. Salaniwal · Langmuir · 2001 · 17 · 177310.1021/la000554f ↗
52. Wijmans · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 764410.1063/1.1362298 ↗