Development and characterization of antibody reagents for detecting nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing use of nanoparticles (NPs) in technological applications and in commercial products has escalated environmental health and safety concerns. The detection of NPs in the environment and in biological systems is challenged by limitations associated with commonly used analytical techniques. In this paper we report on the development and characterization of NP binding antibodies, termed NProbes. Phage display methodology was used to discover antibodies that bind NPs dispersed in solution. We present a proof-of-concept for the generation of NProbes and their use for detecting quantum dots and titanium dioxide NPs in vitro and in an ex vivo human skin model. Continued development and refinement of NProbes to detect NPs that vary in composition, shape, size, and surface coating will comprise a powerful tool kit that can be used to advance nanotechnology research particularly in the nanotoxicology and nanotherapeutics fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Biosensors and Analytical Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering
University of Rochester
Rochester, USA
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
University of Rochester Medical Centre
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Department of Dermatology
Funding
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/nanoparticles-biotechnology-drug-development-delivery-bio113a.html
2. Maurer-Jones · Nanomedicine · 2009 · 4 · 21910.2217/17435889.4.2.219 ↗
3. Robichaud · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 422710.1021/es8032549 ↗
4. Endo · Philos. Transact. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. · 2004 · 362 · 222310.1098/rsta.2004.1437 ↗
5. Woodrow Wilson Intl. Center for Scholars. News release: nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1000 mark [Internet]. August 25, 2009. Available from: available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org
6. Misra · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 175010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.040 ↗
7. Elder · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. · 2009 · 1 · 434
8. AshaRani · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 27910.1021/nn800596w ↗
9. Jin · Chem. Res. Toxicol. · 2008 · 21 · 187110.1021/tx800179f ↗
10. Faunce · Nanoethics · 2008 · 2 · 23110.1007/s11569-008-0041-z ↗
11. Esteve-Turrillas · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2013 · 41 · 1210.1016/j.bios.2012.09.025 ↗
12. Zhang · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2010 · 26 · 14910.1016/j.bios.2010.05.032 ↗
13. Kamat · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 90810.1021/jz400052e ↗
14. Wellesley , Quantum Dots: Global Market Growth and Future Commercial Prospects , Report NAN027D, April 2014
15. Gopee · Toxicol. Sci. · 2009 · 111 · 3710.1093/toxsci/kfp139 ↗
16. Monteiro-Riviere · Toxicol. Sci. · 2011 · 123 · 26410.1093/toxsci/kfr148 ↗
17. Ryman-Rasmussen · Toxicol. Sci. · 2006 · 91 · 15910.1093/toxsci/kfj122 ↗
18. N. A. Monteiro-Riviere and L. W.Zhang , in Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits , 2009
19. Ravichandran · Nanotoxicology · 2011 · 5 · 67510.3109/17435390.2010.537381 ↗
20. Mortensen · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 277910.1021/nl801323y ↗
21. Alvarez-Román · J. Controlled Release · 2004 · 99 · 5310.1016/j.jconrel.2004.06.015 ↗
22. Mortensen · J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 6 · 59610.1166/jbn.2010.1156 ↗
23. Rouse · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 15510.1021/nl062464m ↗
24. Mortensen · Nanotoxicology · 2013 · 7 · 138610.3109/17435390.2012.741726 ↗
25. Larese · Toxicology · 2009 · 255 · 3310.1016/j.tox.2008.09.025 ↗
26. Filon · Nanotoxicology · 2011 · 5 · 49310.3109/17435390.2010.551428 ↗
27. Chou · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 456010.1021/ac900344a ↗
28. DeLouise · J. Invest. Dermatol. · 2012 · 132 · 96410.1038/jid.2011.425 ↗
29. Gulson · Toxicol. Sci. · 2010 · 118 · 14010.1093/toxsci/kfq243 ↗
30. Krug · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 1230410.1002/anie.201403367 ↗
31. Szakal · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 312810.1021/nn501108g ↗
32. Willats · Plant Mol. Biol. · 2002 · 50 · 83710.1023/A:1021215516430 ↗
33. Naik · Nat. Mater. · 2002 · 1 · 16910.1038/nmat758 ↗
34. Whaley · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 66510.1038/35015043 ↗
35. Watanabe · J. Biol. Chem. · 2008 · 283 · 3603110.1074/jbc.M805547200 ↗
36. Hattori · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2012 · 23 · 193410.1021/bc300316p ↗
37. Golec · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2012 · 14 · 121810.1007/s11051-012-1218-5 ↗
38. Rothenstein · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1254710.1021/ja302211w ↗
39. Hattori · J. Biol. Chem. · 2010 · 285 · 778410.1074/jbc.M109.020156 ↗
40. Artzy Schnirman · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 187010.1021/nl0607636 ↗
41. Chen · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1998 · 95 · 1080910.1073/pnas.95.18.10809 ↗
42. Izhaky · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1998 · 95 · 1150910.1073/pnas.95.20.11509 ↗
43. Denny · J. Proteome Res. · 2008 · 7 · 199410.1021/pr700764j ↗
44. Haidaris · J. Immunol. Methods · 2001 · 257 · 18510.1016/S0022-1759(01)00463-X ↗
45. Hoogenboom · Immunotechnology · 1998 · 4 · 110.1016/S1380-2933(98)00007-4 ↗
46. Zheng · J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 9 · 38210.1166/jbn.2013.1561 ↗
47. Weir · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 224210.1021/es204168d ↗
48. Mejare · Trends Biotechnol. · 2001 · 19 · 6710.1016/S0167-7799(00)01534-1 ↗
49. Mardyani · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 632110.1039/b906466d ↗
50. Lamboy · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1645410.1021/ja9050873 ↗
51. Gamer · Toxicol. In Vitro · 2006 · 20 · 30110.1016/j.tiv.2005.08.008 ↗
52. Sadrieh · Toxicol. Sci. · 2010 · 115 · 15610.1093/toxsci/kfq041 ↗
53. Bass · Proteins · 1990 · 8 · 30910.1002/prot.340080405 ↗
54. Smith · Science · 1985 · 228 · 131510.1126/science.4001944 ↗
55. Vodnik · Molecules · 2011 · 16 · 79010.3390/molecules16010790 ↗