Optical spin polarization by coherent magnetoabsorption generation
Source abstract
Abstract
/GaAs quantum wells (QWs) is investigated through magneto-photoluminescence measurements. Notably, spin-dependent intensity oscillations emerge in high magnetic fields, originating from interband transitions between Landau levels in the GaAs barriers and described by the magnetoabsorption effect. These spin-resolved absorption resonances, when coupled with coherent relaxation toward the ground-state optical transition in the type-II QWs lead to pronounced spin polarization peaks. A theoretical framework based on rate equations for spin-split states demonstrates that such polarization is only achieved when spin-flip times are comparable to or exceed the optical recombination time, ensuring that spin orientation is maintained from carrier excitation to optical recombination. This prediction is experimentally validated though time-resolved measurements with circularly polarized excitation, where a spin lifetime of 3.5 ns is determined, confirming the role of magnetoabsorption in sustaining spin coherence.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Federal University of São Carlos, 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
Institute for Nanoscience and Engineering, University of Arkansas, 72701, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California – Los Angeles, 90095, Los Angeles, California, USA
Funding
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Wolf · Science · 2001 · 294 · 148810.1126/science.1065389 ↗
2. Salis · Nature · 2002 · 414 · 61910.1038/414619a ↗
3. Press · Nat. Photonics · 2010 · 4 · 36710.1038/nphoton.2010.83 ↗
4. Mortemousque · PRX Quantum · 2021 · 2 · 03033110.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030331 ↗
5. Ye · npj Comput. Mater. · 2019 · 5 · 4410.1038/s41524-019-0182-3 ↗
6. Wang · npj Quantum Inf. · 2021 · 7 · 5410.1038/s41534-021-00386-2 ↗
7. Deb · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 527710.1038/s41598-021-84451-y ↗
8. Ares · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 04660210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.046602 ↗
9. Herling · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 15530710.1103/PhysRevB.95.155307 ↗
10. Morita · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 01240410.1063/1.5100343 ↗
11. Linpeng · Phys. Rev. B · 2021 · 103 · 11541210.1103/PhysRevB.103.115412 ↗
12. Dusanowski · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 74810.1038/s41467-022-28328-2 ↗
13. Mazur · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 12351810.1063/1.4869803 ↗
14. Dirnberger · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 114 · 20210110.1063/1.5096970 ↗
15. Naranjo · Phys. E · 2021 · 129 · 11459910.1016/j.physe.2020.114599 ↗
16. Jacobsen · Phys. Rev. B · 2024 · 110 · 03541710.1103/PhysRevB.110.035417 ↗
17. Kotova · Phys. Rev. B · 2025 · 111 · 11542710.1103/PhysRevB.111.115427 ↗
18. Liu · Sci. Adv. · 2023 · 9 · eadh508310.1126/sciadv.adh5083 ↗
19. Liu · Nanoscale · 2024 · 16 · 685310.1039/D4NR00644E ↗
20. Smirnov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 15680110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.156801 ↗
21. Baranowski · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 06191010.1063/1.3548544 ↗
22. Chiu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 581010.1063/1.1513200 ↗
23. Llorens · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 11 · 04401110.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044011 ↗
24. Jones · J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 04570310.1063/1.4994305 ↗
25. Jin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 02110210.1063/1.2752778 ↗
26. Haxha · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2009 · 80 · 16533410.1103/PhysRevB.80.165334 ↗
27. Baranowski · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2012 · 24 · 185801
28. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2023 · 122 · 17310510.1063/5.0152094 ↗
29. Ulloa · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 07431110.1063/1.4755794 ↗
30. Michl · Adv. Quantum Technol. · 2023 · 23 · 106
31. Rothmayr · Nanomaterials · 2022 · 12 · 102410.3390/nano12061024 ↗
32. Zhou · Opt. Mater. · 2019 · 98 · 10947910.1016/j.optmat.2019.109479 ↗
33. Abramkin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 11570110.1063/1.5019993 ↗
34. Luo · J. Lumin. · 2022 · 246 · 11882710.1016/j.jlumin.2022.118827 ↗
35. Wood · J. Cryst. Growth · 2015 · 425 · 11010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.02.063 ↗
36. Mazur · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 07431610.1063/1.3493240 ↗
37. Birner · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2007 · 54 · 213710.1109/TED.2007.902871 ↗
38. Vurgaftman · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 581510.1063/1.1368156 ↗
39. Ledentsov · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1995 · 52 · 1405810.1103/PhysRevB.52.14058 ↗
40. Roth · Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 114 · 9010.1103/PhysRev.114.90 ↗
41. Laurindo Jr. · Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105 · 04541410.1103/PhysRevB.105.045414 ↗
42. R.Winkler , S. J.Papadakis , E. P.De Poortere and M.Shayegan , Spin-orbit coupling in two-dimensional electron and hole systems , in Advances in Solid State Physics , ed. B. Kramer , Springer Berlin , Heidelberg, Berlin , 2001 , pp. 211–22310.1007/3-540-44946-9_18 ↗
43. Jacobsen · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2024 · 7 · 1597810.1021/acsanm.4c01041 ↗
44. Masumoto · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 11533110.1103/PhysRevB.77.115331 ↗
45. Hernandez · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 78 · 04130310.1103/PhysRevB.78.041303 ↗
46. Varwig · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2013 · 87 · 11530710.1103/PhysRevB.87.115307 ↗
47. Terent'ev · Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2013 · 87 · 04531510.1103/PhysRevB.87.045315 ↗