Translocation of flexible and tensioned ssDNA through in silico designed hydrophobic nanopores with two constrictions
Source abstract
Abstract
Protein-inspired nanopores with hydrophobic constriction regions have previously been shown to offer some promise for DNA sequencing. Here we explore a series of pores with two hydrophobic constrictions. The impact of nanopore radius, the nature of residues that define the constriction region and the flexibility of the ssDNA is explored. Our results show that aromatic residues slow down DNA translocation, and in the case of short DNA strands, they cause deviations from a linear DNA conformation. When DNA is under tension, translocation is once again slower when aromatic residues are present in the constriction. However, the lack of flexibility in the DNA backbone provides a narrower window of opportunity for the DNA bases to be retained inside the pore via interaction with the aromatic residues, compared to more flexible strands. Consequently, there is more variability in translocation rates for strands under tension. DNA entry into the pores is correlated to pore width, but no such correlation between width and translocation rate is observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry
University of Southampton
Highfield Campus
Southampton
UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Leverhulme Trust
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Ayub · Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. · 2016 · 34 · 11710.1016/j.cbpa.2016.08.005 ↗
2. Maglia · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 1972010.1073/pnas.0808296105 ↗
3. Rincon-Restrepo · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 74610.1021/nl1038874 ↗
4. Stoddart · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 55610.1002/anie.200905483 ↗
5. Bond · Biochemistry · 2011 · 50 · 377710.1021/bi101404n ↗
6. Haynes · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 820810.1021/acsnano.8b03365 ↗
7. Heerema · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 12710.1038/nnano.2015.307 ↗
8. Sanchez · Methods Mol. Biol. · 2000 · 143 · 97
9. Trick · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 1126810.1021/nn503930p ↗
10. Lu · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2003 · 31 · 510810.1093/nar/gkg680 ↗
11. Pall · Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 8759 · 310.1007/978-3-319-15976-8_1 ↗
12. Oostenbrink · Eur. Biophys. J. · 2005 · 34 · 27310.1007/s00249-004-0448-6 ↗
13. Berger · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 200210.1016/S0006-3495(97)78845-3 ↗
14. Berweger · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 232 · 42910.1016/0009-2614(94)01391-8 ↗
15. Darden · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 1008910.1063/1.464397 ↗
16. Parrinello · J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 718210.1063/1.328693 ↗
17. Hess · J. Comput. Chem. · 1997 · 18 · 146310.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
18. Guy · Biophys. J. · 2012 · 103 · 102810.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.012 ↗
19. Manara · Nanomaterials · 2015 · 5 · 14410.3390/nano5010144 ↗
20. Bhattacharya · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 696010.1021/nn3019943 ↗
21. Smart · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 35410.1016/S0263-7855(97)00009-X ↗
22. Humphrey · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
23. Skylaris · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 122 · 8411910.1063/1.1839852 ↗
24. Bell · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 38010.1038/s41467-017-00423-9 ↗
25. Derrington · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2010 · 107 · 1606010.1073/pnas.1001831107 ↗
26. Manara · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1278310.1038/srep12783 ↗
27. Prentice · J. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 152 · 17411110.1063/5.0004445 ↗