Quantifying intuition: Bayesian approach to figures of merit in EXAFS analysis of magic size clusters
Source abstract
Abstract
Analysis of the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) can yield local structural information in magic size clusters even when other structural methods (such as X-ray diffraction) fail, but typically requires an initial guess - an atomistic model. Model comparison is thus one of the most crucial steps in establishing atomic structure of nanoscale systems and relies critically on the corresponding figures of merit (delivered by the data analysis) to make a decision on the most suitable model of atomic arrangements. However, none of the currently used statistical figures of merit take into account the significant factor of parameter correlations. Here we show that ignoring such correlations may result in a selection of an incorrect structural model. We then report on a new metric based on Bayes theorem that addresses this problem. We show that our new metric is superior to the currently used in EXAFS analysis as it reliably yields correct structural models even in cases when other statistical criteria may fail. We then demonstrate the utility of the new figure of merit in comparison of structural models for CdS magic-size clusters using EXAFS data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
QMUL, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Diamond Light Source, Diamond House Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, UK
Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
Funding
Diamond Light Source · Queen Mary University of London
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 112310.1002/adma.201104081 ↗
2. Kirkwood · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1823810.1039/C8NR06635C ↗
3. Kudera · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 54810.1002/adma.200601015 ↗
4. Zhang · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 249910.1038/s41467-018-04842-0 ↗
5. Tan · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 2190010.1039/C9NR06355B ↗
6. Ying Liu · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 1932510.1039/D0NR05186A ↗
7. B.Ravel , Quantitative EXAFS Analysis , National Institute of Standards and Technology , 2015
8. F.d'Acapito , Introduction to ab-initio methods for EXAFS data analysis , 2007
9. Tan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 2937010.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05763 ↗
10. B.Ravel , Demeter Homepage, https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/
11. Newville · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2013 · 430 · 012007
12. Robben · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2021 · 125 · 1287610.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08764 ↗
13. Hae · Korean J. Anesthesiol. · 2019 · 72 · 55810.4097/kja.19087 ↗
14. Stewart · Stat. Sci. · 1987 · 2 · 68
15. B.Ravel , 7.2. The heuristic happiness parameter, 2016, Accessed December 12, 2022. https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/documents/Artemis/fit/happiness.html
16. Dunstan · Sci. Rep. · 2022 · 12 · 99310.1038/s41598-021-04694-7 ↗
17. Zhu · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 779 · 13887010.1016/j.cplett.2021.138870 ↗
18. Stern · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1993 · 48 · 982510.1103/PhysRevB.48.9825 ↗
19. Kelly · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2007 · 88210.1063/1.2644451 ↗
20. Binsted · Physica B: Condensed Matter · 1995 · 208-209 · 12910.1016/0921-4526(94)00648-F ↗
21. Ghigna · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2001 · 34 · 32510.1107/S0021889801004745 ↗
22. MacKay · Neural Comput. · 1991 · 4 · 41510.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
23. P.Gregory , Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , Cambridge University Press , 200510.1017/CBO9780511791277 ↗
24. Krappe · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2002 · 66 · 18430310.1103/PhysRevB.66.184303 ↗
25. Kass · J. Am. Stat. Assoc. · 1995 · 90 · 77310.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 ↗
26. Sapelkin · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2002 · 65 · 17210410.1103/PhysRevB.65.172104 ↗
27. K.Takemura , Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure Analysis of Crystalline Germanium at High Pressure , AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2010 ED41A-0622
28. Bates · Science · 1965 · 147 · 86010.1126/science.147.3660.860 ↗
29. Corsini · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 733410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02627 ↗
30. Rehr · C. R. Phys. · 2009 · 10 · 54810.1016/j.crhy.2008.08.004 ↗
31. Takemura · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2000 · 62 · R1060310.1103/PhysRevB.62.R10603 ↗
32. Takemura · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2001 · 223 · 38510.1002/1521-3951(200101)223:2<385::AID-PSSB385>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
33. G.Bunker , Introduction to XAFS: A Practical Guide to X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy , Cambridge University Press , 2010 , pp. 127–12810.1017/CBO9780511809194 ↗
34. Jeong · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2002 · 67 · 10430110.1103/PhysRevB.67.104301 ↗
35. Sevillano · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1979 · 20 · 490810.1103/PhysRevB.20.4908 ↗
36. Tien · Solid State Commun. · 2022 · 353 · 11484210.1016/j.ssc.2022.114842 ↗
37. Yeh · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1992 · 46 · 1008610.1103/PhysRevB.46.10086 ↗
38. Sowa · Solid State Sci. · 2005 · 7 · 7310.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.10.011 ↗
39. Chen · Phys. B · 2011 · 406 · 405210.1016/j.physb.2011.07.044 ↗
40. Billinge · Science · 2007 · 316 · 56110.1126/science.1135080 ↗
41. Corsini · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 733410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02627 ↗
42. Gary · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 151010.1021/jacs.5b13214 ↗
43. Rappe · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1992 · 114 · 1002410.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
44. Hanwell · J Cheminform. · 2012 · 4 · 1710.1186/1758-2946-4-17 ↗
45. Timoshenko · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2019 · 12 · 50110.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-114929 ↗
46. Mistryukova · Phys. Rev. B · 2021 · 104 · 05410810.1103/PhysRevB.104.054108 ↗
47. Oganov · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 24470410.1063/1.2210932 ↗
48. Klementev · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 34 · 1510.1088/0022-3727/34/10A/304 ↗