Inter-particle biomolecular reactivity tuned by surface crowders
Source abstract
Abstract
The rate at which colloidal particles can form biomolecular bonds controls the kinetics of applications such as particle-based biosensing, targeted drug delivery and directed colloidal assembly. Here we study how the reactivity of the particle surface depends on its molecular composition, quantified by the inter-particle rate of aggregation in an optomagnetic cluster experiment. Particles were functionalized with DNA or with proteins for specific binding, and with polyethylene glycol as a passive surface crowder. The data show that the inter-particle binding kinetics are dominated by specific interactions, which surprisingly can be tuned by the passive crowder molecules for both the DNA and the protein system. The experimental results are interpreted using model simulations, which show that the crowder-induced decrease of the particle surface reactivity can be described as a reduced reactivity of the specific binder molecules on the particle surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology
Department of Applied Physics
5600 MB Eindhoven
The Netherlands
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Ranzoni · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 313410.1021/nn204913f ↗
2. Davies · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1996 · 93 · 710.1073/pnas.93.1.7 ↗
3. Bonham · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1457210.1021/ja0767837 ↗
4. Wang · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 133510.1016/S0006-3495(97)78780-0 ↗
5. Jing · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2011 · 686 · 910.1016/j.aca.2010.10.032 ↗
6. Srinivas · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 913810.1021/ac202335u ↗
7. Müller · Biomaterials · 2017 · 115 · 110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.015 ↗
8. Gillich · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 31610.1021/nn304045q ↗
9. Sorret · J. Pharm. Sci. · 2019 · 108 · 16210.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.045 ↗
10. Helfricht · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 949110.1039/C7NR02226C ↗
11. Schein · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 141410.1021/nl504840b ↗
12. van Ommering · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 38550110.1088/0022-3727/43/38/385501 ↗
13. Wang · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 1212910.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03420 ↗
14. Biancaniello · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 11370210.1063/1.2387893 ↗
15. Scheepers · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 1053310.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01461 ↗
16. Xu · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1490210.1038/ncomms14902 ↗
17. Knowles · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1269910.1073/pnas.1103382108 ↗