journal article·2025

Effect of titanium–copper co-substitution in O3-type layered oxide cathodes on the electrochemical performance of sodium-ion batteries

Hefang Fan, Haikong Jin, Mingfang Ma, Haifeng Chen, Run Ma, De Yan

Nanoscale· Volume 17· Issue 43
Publisher page

Abstract

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are considered the best alternatives to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for energy storage owing to their abundant sodium resources and low cost. O3-type layered transition metal oxides (NaxTMO2) have been considered as a promising cathode material for SIBs. However, the irreversible phase transition is a concerning challenge for O3-type layered oxides. Here, a Cu/Ti co-substituted NaNi0.47Cu0.03Mn0.35Ti0.15O2 (NNCMT-0.03) cathode is investigated. Results show that the NNCMT-0.03 cathode exhibits a homogeneous phase transition, specific capacity of 150.93 mAh g-1 at 1 C, high cycle stability with capacity retention of 80.02% at 1 C in the range of 2.0-4.3 V after 200 cycles and excellent air stability with a single O3 phase after exposure to air for 40 days. Here, the substitution of Mn4+ with Ti4+ can increase the Mn3+/Mn4+ ratio, enhance the redox reaction of Mn3+/Mn4+ and improve the specific capacity of the cathode. The high electronegativity of Cu2+ leads to a negative charge shift from the lattice oxygen to the TM ions, which greatly contributes to air stability, rate performance and good diffusion kinetics. The strategy might inspire the design and development of excellent cycling stability and high-energy density cathodes for SIBs.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials & Energy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province · Shanghai Jiao Tong University

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Manthiram · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2017 · 3 · 106310.1021/acscentsci.7b00288 ↗
2. Nayak · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 10210.1002/anie.201703772 ↗
3. Schmuch · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 26710.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 ↗
4. Liu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 190783710.1002/adfm.201907837 ↗
5. Yang · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2021 · 148 · 10975010.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109750 ↗
6. Kim · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 71010.1002/aenm.201200026 ↗
7. Li · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 494810.1039/C7TA10374C ↗
8. Chen · EcoEnergy · 2025 · 3 · 25410.1002/ece2.83 ↗
9. Qin · Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. · 2024 · 40 · 231003410.3866/PKU.WHXB202310034 ↗
10. Muruganantham · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1480810.1038/s41598-017-13718-0 ↗
11. Peng · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 170285610.1002/aenm.201702856 ↗
12. Yang · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 24 · 69410.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.002 ↗
13. Chen · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 59 · 1207610.1002/anie.202003275 ↗
14. Chen · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 59 · 244910.1002/anie.201912964 ↗
15. Chen · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 858 · 15771710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157717 ↗
16. Tang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 384 · 12323410.1016/j.cej.2019.123234 ↗
17. Li · Adv. Sci. · 2015 · 2 · 150003110.1002/advs.201500031 ↗
18. Wang · Sci. Adv · 2018 · 4 · eaar601810.1126/sciadv.aar6018 ↗
19. Zhang · Nano Energy · 2022 · 100 · 10748210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107482 ↗
20. Kong · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 909910.1039/C9TA00968J ↗
21. Zuo · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 354410.1038/s41467-020-17290-6 ↗
22. Yabuuchi · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 1163610.1021/cr500192f ↗
23. Delmas · Physica B+C · 1980 · 99 · 8110.1016/0378-4363(80)90214-4 ↗
24. Wang · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 170021010.1002/adma.201700210 ↗
25. Yuan · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 858510.1021/acsami.5b00594 ↗
26. Hong · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 2292510.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06032 ↗
27. Wang · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 170021010.1002/adma.201700210 ↗
28. Tan · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2022 · 622 · 103710.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.112 ↗
29. Peng · Energy Storage Mater. · 2023 · 56 · 63110.1016/j.ensm.2023.02.001 ↗
30. Goyal · J. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 48 · 530110.1007/s11664-019-07340-1 ↗
31. Chen · Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. · 2021 · 37 · 28010.1007/s40242-021-0441-y ↗
32. Li · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 446 · 13692310.1016/j.cej.2022.136923 ↗
33. Luo · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 383 · 8010.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.053 ↗
34. Nesbitt · Am. Mineral. · 1998 · 83 · 30510.2138/am-1998-3-414 ↗
35. Zhao · Chem · 2019 · 5 · 291310.1016/j.chempr.2019.08.003 ↗
36. Kim · Sci. Adv. · 2025 · 11 · eadt023210.1126/sciadv.adt0232 ↗
37. Cao · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 240910.1021/acsenergylett.9b01732 ↗
38. Zhao · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 41 · 58110.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.029 ↗
39. Li · Adv. Mater. · 2024 · 36 · 240307310.1002/adma.202403073 ↗
40. Cabana · Inorg. Chem. · 2013 · 52 · 854010.1021/ic400579w ↗
41. Komaba · Inorg. Chem. · 2012 · 51 · 621110.1021/ic300357d ↗
42. Fielden · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · A45310.1149/2.0551503jes ↗