journal article·2025

A tale of two syntheses: a comparative study of the physical and photocatalytic properties of covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs)

Mads Lund Nygaard Nielsen, Ruchi Sharma, Marcel Ceccato, Melissa Jane Marks, Sara Frank, Jørgen Skibsted, Jacopo Catalano, Nina Lock

Nanoscale· Volume 17· Issue 42
Publisher page

Abstract

Covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) have exhibited promising photocatalytic capabilities for organic transformations, CO2 reduction and water treatment, yet the links between synthesis procedure and structural- and catalytic properties are essentially unexplored. This study investigates CTF-1 type materials prepared by two distinct synthesis procedures: One variant of CTF-1 was synthesised via a solvent-assisted route over three days at 30 °C (CTF-1(SS)), while the other form was synthesised at 250 °C over 12 hours (CTF-1(DS)) followed by post-synthetic modification through either heat- or mechanical treatment for removal of excess triflic acid catalyst. All synthesised materials could be identified as different CTF-1 variants; however, the synthesis choice profoundly impacts the material properties. Pristine CTF-1(DS) is semicrystalline with good visible light absorption and high thermal stability. In contrast, CTF-1(SS) is amorphous with embedded amide functionalities and limited visible light absorption and thermal stability, which is attributed to a lower degree of polymerization/conjugation. Surprisingly, due to the embedded amide sites, the amorphous CTF-1(SS) exhibits higher photocatalytic activity than pristine CTF-1(DS) under UV light. However, CTF-1(DS) shows the best photocatalytic properties after post-synthetic removal of residual triflic acid. Heat treatment allows complete removal of residual acid, and ball-milling only achieves partial acid removal. This study, therefore, demonstrates that choosing appropriate methods for synthesis facilitates the enhancement of desired physical- and light absorption properties in CTF-1-based photocatalysts and that nuanced characterisation techniques are required to fully understand the photocatalytic behaviour of different CTF-1 variants.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Caching and Content Delivery · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Carbon Dioxide Activation Center (CADIAC), Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Åbogade 40, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Carbon Dioxide Activation Center (CADIAC), Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Åbogade 40, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Funding

Carlsbergfondet · Danmarks Grundforskningsfond · DanScatt

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Sordello · Catalysts · 2022 · 12 · 157210.3390/catal12121572 ↗
2. Ravelli · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 199910.1039/b714786b ↗
3. Corredor · J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. · 2019 · 94 · 304910.1002/jctb.6123 ↗
4. Chen · J. Cleaner Prod. · 2020 · 268 · 12172510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725 ↗
5. Lang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2014 · 43 · 47310.1039/C3CS60188A ↗
6. Ikreedeegh · J. CO2 Util. · 2021 · 43 · 10138110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101381 ↗
7. Chen · Mater. Rep.: Energy · 2023 · 3 · 100193
8. Mao · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 3 · 248110.1039/c3cy00345k ↗
9. Chong · Water Res. · 2010 · 44 · 299710.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 ↗
10. Dong · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 1461010.1039/C4RA13734E ↗
11. Vu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 190182510.1002/adfm.201901825 ↗
12. Qu · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 256810.1039/C2CS35355E ↗
13. Weng · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 464210.1021/acscatal.9b00313 ↗
14. Lu · Carbon Neutralization · 2024 · 3 · 14210.1002/cnl2.107 ↗
15. Gu · Chem. Commun. · 2023 · 59 · 730210.1039/D3CC01970E ↗
16. Zhu · Small · 2021 · 17 · 210107010.1002/smll.202101070 ↗
17. Ran · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170464910.1002/adma.201704649 ↗
18. Mino · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 535510.1021/acsanm.8b01477 ↗
19. Gupta · Mater. Today Chem. · 2021 · 20 · 10042810.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100428 ↗
20. Li · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 507310.1021/acsami.0c19945 ↗
21. Qian · Chem. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · 190910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04348 ↗
22. Sun · Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. · 2022 · 38 · 31010.1007/s40242-022-1468-4 ↗
23. Sun · Chemistry · 2023 · 29 · e20220307710.1002/chem.202203077 ↗
24. Carmo · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2023 · 11 · 1381510.1039/D3TA01470C ↗
25. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 515310.1039/C8TA12442F ↗
26. Bi · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2015 · 36 · 179910.1002/marc.201500270 ↗
27. Sun · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · e20211392610.1002/anie.202113926 ↗
28. Chen · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 12 · 544210.1039/D2CY00773H ↗
29. Huang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 427 · 13101810.1016/j.cej.2021.131018 ↗
30. Bi · ChemPlusChem · 2019 · 84 · 114910.1002/cplu.201900329 ↗
31. Li · Sci. China Mater. · 2023 · 66 · 229010.1007/s40843-022-2394-6 ↗
32. Ren · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 235710.1002/adma.201200751 ↗
33. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 685610.1021/jacs.0c00365 ↗
34. Zhao · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2023 · 618 · 15669710.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156697 ↗
35. Rawat · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2022 · 5 · 1437710.1021/acsanm.2c02647 ↗
36. Kuecken · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 2442210.1039/C5TA07408H ↗
37. Xie · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 161710.1039/C7EE02981K ↗
38. Kuhn · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 345010.1002/anie.200705710 ↗
39. Li · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2022 · 608 · 144910.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.100 ↗
40. Stojakovic · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 795810.1039/c2cc33227b ↗
41. Dai · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 2410.1039/C9EE01935A ↗
42. Tuncel · Nanoscale Adv. · 2019 · 1 · 1910.1039/C8NA00108A ↗
43. Shu · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · e200849810.1002/adma.202008498 ↗
44. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2114810.1021/jp5051639 ↗
45. Luo · ChemSusChem · 2020 · 13 · 650910.1002/cssc.202002422 ↗
46. Banaru · Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. · 2010 · 65 · 36210.3103/S0027131410060052 ↗
47. Ma · Constr. Build. Mater. · 2021 · 278 · 12238610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122386 ↗
48. Spann · J. Polym. Sci. · 2022 · 61 · 50310.1002/pol.20220573 ↗
49. Thommes · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2015 · 87 · 105110.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
50. Ibhadon · Catalysts · 2013 · 3 · 18910.3390/catal3010189 ↗
51. Derikvandi · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2017 · 490 · 65210.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.105 ↗
52. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 1121910.1021/jacs.9b04556 ↗
53. Schneider · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 347910.1021/jz4018199 ↗
54. Agrios · J. Photochem. Photobiol., A · 2006 · 180 · 13010.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.10.003 ↗
55. Bo · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 1219610.1039/D0NR02596H ↗
56. Yang · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2021 · 9 · 1337610.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04994 ↗
57. Quan · Small · 2018 · 14 · 170453110.1002/smll.201704531 ↗
58. Chen · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 10121410.1039/C5RA18302B ↗
59. Ma · Desalin. Water Treat. · 2021 · 231 · 28710.5004/dwt.2021.27488 ↗
60. Karmakar · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 395 · 8610.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.022 ↗
61. Yanagi · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 7 · 43210.1021/acsenergylett.1c02516 ↗
62. Marks · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 2349610.1021/acsami.2c03837 ↗
63. Marks · Small · 2024 · 240141310.1002/smll.202401413 ↗
64. Liu · ACS Catal. · 2022 · 12 · 1238610.1021/acscatal.2c03550 ↗
65. Zhong · ChemSusChem · 2019 · 12 · 449310.1002/cssc.201901997 ↗
66. Kieffer · J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. · 2013 · 425 · 202012
67. X.Yang , P.Juhas , C. L.Farrow and S. J.Billinge , arXiv , 2014 , preprint, arXiv:1402.3163, 10.48550/arXiv.1402.316310.48550/arXiv.1402.3163 ↗
68. Landers · Colloids Surf., A · 2013 · 437 · 310.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.007 ↗