Regenerated and reformed gold and titanium dioxide quantum dots from waste for sustainable and efficient environmental monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
Driven by the urgent need for sustainable materials in advanced technologies, this study investigates the potential of regenerated and reformed waste materials containing Au and TiO2 quantum dots (R-Au-TiO2 QDs), derived from industrial waste, as a viable alternative to commercial TiO2 (C-TiO2) for photocatalytic applications. The R-Au-TiO2 QDs demonstrate a high purity of 99.8 wt% and a particle size of less than 10 nm. The presence of Au (0.24 wt%) further enhances the photocatalytic performance of R-Au-TiO2 QDs through localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), leading to superior degradation rates of methylene blue (MB) when deposited on flexible aluminum foil substrates under UV and solar light. R-Au-TiO2 QDs achieve a degradation rate of 82.5% with a rate constant of 0.029 min-1 under UV light, representing a 28% increase in degradation rate and a 70% increase in the rate constant compared to 64.5% and 0.017 min-1, respectively, for C-TiO2. Under the solar simulator, R-Au-TiO2 QDs also outperform C-TiO2, achieving a degradation rate of 68%, further highlighting their effectiveness. These results are attributed to smaller particle size, higher surface area, enhanced light absorption and improved charge separation in the R-Au-TiO2 hybrid material. This study demonstrates that R-Au-TiO2 QDs not only match, but often surpass, the performance of commercial TiO2, offering a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for UV sensing, environmental monitoring, and water purification systems. These findings advocate for the strategic utilization of waste resources containing valuable elements to regenerate high-performance materials, thereby contributing to the development of a circular and sustainable economy.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Sustainable Materials Research and Technology (SMaRT), School of Materials Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney 2052, NSW, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Iluţiu-Varvara · Sustainability · 2022 · 14 · 548810.3390/su14095488 ↗
2. Matinde · J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. · 2018 · 118 · 82510.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n8a5 ↗
3. Peng · JOM · 2016 · 68 · 231310.1007/s11837-016-2047-2 ↗
4. Shatokhin · Metallurgist · 2017 · 61 · 52310.1007/s11015-017-0527-4 ↗
5. S.Ramachandra Rao , in Metallurgical Slags, Dust and Fumes , Elsevier , 2006 , pp. 269–327
6. Reuter · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2019 · 49 · 25310.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010057 ↗
7. Singh · Mater. Today: Proc. · 2020 · 30 · 332
8. Yi · Proc. Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 16 · 79110.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.108 ↗
9. Qiu · Fuel · 2022 · 315 · 12321810.1016/j.fuel.2022.123218 ↗
10. Wu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2023 · 464 · 14253210.1016/j.cej.2023.142532 ↗
11. Jinga · Nanomaterials · 2021 · 11 · 160510.3390/nano11061605 ↗
12. Yogi · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 588110.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.050 ↗
13. Abideen · Nanoscale · 2024 · 16 · 925910.1039/D4NR00073K ↗
14. Abideen · Nanoscale · 2024 · 16 · 775210.1039/D4NR00321G ↗
15. Wang · Chin. J. Catal. · 2019 · 40 · 40310.1016/S1872-2067(18)63174-2 ↗
16. Toby · Powder Diffr. · 2006 · 21 · 6710.1154/1.2179804 ↗
17. McCusker · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 1999 · 32 · 3610.1107/S0021889898009856 ↗
18. Inagaki · Chemosphere · 2006 · 64 · 43710.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.052 ↗
19. Tian · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2009 · 161 · 112210.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.065 ↗
20. Chi · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2021 · 570 · 15114710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151147 ↗
21. Lal · Optik · 2021 · 241 · 16693410.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166934 ↗
22. Connor · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 240210.1021/la980855d ↗
23. Humayun · Green Chem. Lett. Rev. · 2018 · 11 · 8610.1080/17518253.2018.1440324 ↗
24. Zhao · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 599310.1021/jp712049c ↗
25. Su · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 771010.1021/jp7118422 ↗
26. Prakash · Appl. Mater. Today · 2018 · 11 · 8210.1016/j.apmt.2018.02.002 ↗
27. Chen · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 289110.1021/cr0500535 ↗
28. Ali · RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 3012510.1039/C8RA06517A ↗
29. Azeez · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 710410.1038/s41598-018-25673-5 ↗
30. Li · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2022 · 10 · 210246810.1002/adom.202102468 ↗
31. Huang · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 9 · 220032710.1002/admi.202200327 ↗
32. Duran · ACS Omega · 2023 · 8 · 2728410.1021/acsomega.3c02657 ↗
33. Tichapondwa · Phys. Chem. Earth (Pt A, B, C) · 2020 · 118–119 · 10290010.1016/j.pce.2020.102900 ↗
34. Dubourg · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 625710.1021/acsami.8b19976 ↗
35. Peng · Appl. Organomet. Chem. · 2024 · 38 · e737410.1002/aoc.7374 ↗
36. Zhao · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2017 · 3 · 48210.1021/acscentsci.7b00122 ↗
37. Suwarnkar · Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 548910.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.137 ↗
38. Ren · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 160810.1021/am404457u ↗
39. Khiabani · ACS Sens. · 2016 · 1 · 77510.1021/acssensors.6b00244 ↗
40. Khayyam Nekouei · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 7 · 10313310.1016/j.jece.2019.103133 ↗
41. Weatherall · J. Invest. Dermatol. · 1992 · 99 · 46810.1111/1523-1747.ep12616156 ↗
42. Durmus · Color Res. Appl. · 2020 · 45 · 79610.1002/col.22521 ↗
43. Daghrir · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 52 · 358110.1021/ie303468t ↗
44. Akpan · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2009 · 170 · 52010.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.039 ↗
45. Linnik · Russ. J. Gen. Chem. · 2015 · 85 · 290810.1134/S107036321513006X ↗
46. Chakraborty · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 382 · 8510.1016/j.ccr.2018.11.011 ↗
47. Monshi · World J. Nano Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 02 · 15410.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
48. Abideen · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2023 · 9 · 220090510.1002/aelm.202200905 ↗
49. Abideen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2023 · 15 · 5646410.1021/acsami.3c12668 ↗