Mechanisms and effects of gas intercalation into ionic liquids confined within charged nanoscale volumes
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the behavior of gas within confined ionic liquids (ILs) is important for a wide range of emerging energy, separation, and sensing technologies. However, the mechanisms governing gas solubility and molecular structure within these systems remain largely unknown. Here, we investigate the factors that dictate the intercalation and arrangement of CO2, N2 and O2, in a commonly used IL (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [BMIM+][PF6-]) confined within neutral and charged 2.1 nm diameter carbon nanotubes (CNTs) via molecular dynamics simulations and enhanced free energy sampling methods. Our simulations show that the gas selectivity in these systems can be explained by a competitive complex interplay between confinement, charge state of CNTs, and IL properties. We then experimentally validate a subset of these predictions using a novel device consisting of electrically addressable, IL-infilled CNTs which we expose to CO2 and O2 in a N2 background. Our findings help to disentangle the relative importance of tuning gas solubility and preferential proximity to the CNT wall for maximizing measurable changes of electrochemical signals. These insights provide a foundation for engineering future electrochemical systems utilized in gas sensing or separation applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionic liquids properties and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
Engineering, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
Funding
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · Basic Energy Sciences
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Silvester · Z. Phys. Chem. · 2006 · 220 · 124710.1524/zpch.2006.220.10.1247 ↗
2. Welton · Biophys. Rev. · 2018 · 10 · 69110.1007/s12551-018-0419-2 ↗
3. Jacquemin · J. Solution Chem. · 2007 · 36 · 96710.1007/s10953-007-9159-9 ↗
4. Anthony · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 636610.1021/jp046404l ↗
5. Zhang · Chem. Rev. · 2017 · 117 · 675510.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00509 ↗
6. Chen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 241610.1021/ja067972c ↗
7. Berrod · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 784510.1039/C6NR01445C ↗
8. Chathoth · Epl-Europhys. Lett. · 2012 · 97 · 6600410.1209/0295-5075/97/66004 ↗
9. Kondrat · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 38710.1038/nmat3916 ↗
10. Zhang · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 197110.1039/b920556j ↗
11. Pei · Mater. Today Nano · 2022 · 17 · 10015910.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100159 ↗
12. Kaur · J. Mol. Liq. · 2022 · 351 · 11855610.1016/j.molliq.2022.118556 ↗
13. Ying · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 538510.1021/acsnano.8b00367 ↗
14. Close · J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 390–391 · 20110.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.037 ↗
15. Rahmani · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 4446010.1021/acsami.1c13169 ↗
16. Goubaidoulline · Anal. Chem. · 2005 · 77 · 61510.1021/ac048436a ↗
17. Park · ACS Sens. · 2018 · 3 · 243210.1021/acssensors.8b00987 ↗
18. Fedorov · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 297810.1021/cr400374x ↗
19. Pinilla · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1792210.1021/jp052999o ↗
20. Maolin · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 13450410.1063/1.2898497 ↗
21. Shim · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 169310.1021/nn900195b ↗
22. Ghoufi · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2851810.1038/srep28518 ↗
23. Chaban · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 819010.1021/nn502475j ↗
24. Tian · ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 9510.1021/acsapm.8b00089 ↗
25. Shi · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 556310.1021/la400226g ↗
26. Shi · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 1502910.1021/jp106500p ↗
27. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
28. Tribello · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2014 · 185 · 60410.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018 ↗
29. Weitzner · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 492210.1039/D1NR07515B ↗
30. Harris · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 1202110.1021/j100031a034 ↗
31. Murthy · Mol. Phys. · 1980 · 41 · 138710.1080/00268978000103611 ↗
32. Watanabe · Mol. Simul. · 1995 · 15 · 19710.1080/08927029508022335 ↗
33. Mondal · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2014 · 118 · 340910.1021/jp500296x ↗
34. J.Walther , R.Jaffe , T.Halicioglu and P.Koumoutsakos , Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Carbon Nanotubes in Water, 2000
35. Barducci · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 02060310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 ↗
36. Laio · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 1256210.1073/pnas.202427399 ↗
37. Aydin · Biophys. J. · 2019 · 117 · 8710.1016/j.bpj.2019.05.012 ↗
38. Meshot · Carbon · 2020 · 159 · 23610.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.023 ↗
39. Park · Carbon · 2023 · 201 · 74510.1016/j.carbon.2022.09.068 ↗
40. Sun · J. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 149 · 07231010.1063/1.5027004 ↗
41. Jacquemin · Fluid Phase Equilib. · 2006 · 240 · 8710.1016/j.fluid.2005.12.003 ↗
42. Harmanli · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2021 · 143 · 937710.1021/jacs.1c00783 ↗
43. Paek · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 160 · A110.1149/2.019301jes ↗
44. Wang · Anal. Chem. · 2016 · 88 · 195910.1021/acs.analchem.5b04677 ↗
45. Cabaço · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2012 · 116 · 160510.1021/jp211211n ↗
46. Xia · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 50510.1038/nnano.2009.177 ↗
47. Doblinger · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 2030910.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07012 ↗
48. Gong · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 544610.1002/anie.200801744 ↗
49. Kang · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 104810.1088/0957-4484/16/8/008 ↗