journal article·2024Open access

Stability of [10–12]cycloparaphenylene complexes with pristine fullerenes C 76,78,84 and endohedral metallofullerenes M 3 N@C 78,80

Markus Freiberger, Olga A. Stasyuk, M. Eugenia Pérez-Ojeda, Luis A. Echegoyen, Miquel Solà, Thomas Drewello

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 45

Abstract

[n]Cycloparaphenylenes ([n]CPPs) are strained macrocycles, comprising only sp2-hybridized carbon atoms. In recent years, [n]CPPs have become of great research interest in the field of supramolecular chemistry since their special structure enables the formation of novel host-guest complexes. In this work, we investigate the gas-phase chemistry of noncovalent complexes of [10-12]CPP with the pristine fullerenes C76/78/84 and the endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) Sc3N@D3h-C78, Sc3N@D5h-C80 and M3N@Ih-C80 (M = Sc, Y, Lu, Gd). The [1 : 1] complexes with [10-12]CPP are detected as radical cations. The stability and charge distributions of these complexes are studied using energy-resolved collision-induced dissociation (ER-CID). Our results assess the size complementarity, the influence of fullerene symmetry and size as well as the role of the metal size inside the EMF on the binding affinity and complex stability. Two main trends in complex stability have been found: First, [10-12]CPP form more stable complexes with EMFs than with pristine fullerenes and second, all complexes of EMFs with the C80 skeleton show similar stability despite the different metal clusters encapsulated. Another major finding is the fact that [11]CPP is generally the most suitable host for fullerenes with a C76/78/80/84 skeleton. Considering the charge distributions, we observe the existence of two different fragmentation channels for complexes with EMFs where the radical cation is either located at the CPP or at the EMF: (1) [n]CPP+˙ + EMF and (2) [n]CPP + EMF+˙. This behavior allows a clear distinction of the cage isomers ([11]CPP⊃Sc3N@Ih-C80)+˙ and ([11]CPP⊃Sc3N@D5h-C80)+˙ in the MS2 experiment. The experimental results are accompanied by density functional theory (DFT) calculations of ionization potentials (IPs) and fragmentation energies. The computational results fully confirm the measured order of complex stabilities and explain the prevalence of EMF or CPP signals in the spectra by the trend in ionization potentials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Institute of Computational Chemistry and Catalysis and Department of Chemistry, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Catalonia, Spain

Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA

Institut Català d'Investigació Química, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación · Generalitat de Catalunya · Universitat de Girona · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Iijima · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Smith · Nature · 1998 · 396 · 32310.1038/24521 ↗
3. Hirahara · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 538410.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5384 ↗
4. Smith · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 331 · 13710.1016/S0009-2614(00)01008-3 ↗
5. Débarre · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 08550110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.085501 ↗
6. Chiu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 384510.1063/1.1415770 ↗
7. Khlobystov · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 20 · 96910.1179/174328413X13789824293425 ↗
8. Xu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 59 · 55910.1002/anie.201906069 ↗
9. Jasti · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1764610.1021/ja807126u ↗
10. Lu · Front. Chem. · 2019 · 7 · 66810.3389/fchem.2019.00668 ↗
11. Lehn · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 1988 · 27 · 8910.1002/anie.198800891 ↗
12. Iwamoto · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 834210.1002/anie.201102302 ↗
13. Xia · Chem. Sci. · 2012 · 3 · 301810.1039/c2sc20719b ↗
14. Minameyer · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2020 · 26 · 872910.1002/chem.202001503 ↗
15. Freiberger · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2023 · 15 · 5665
16. Ubasart · Nat. Chem. · 2021 · 13 · 42010.1038/s41557-021-00658-6 ↗
17. Volkmann · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2023 · e20230026810.1002/chem.202300268 ↗
18. Pareras · J. Org. Chem. · 2022 · 87 · 514910.1021/acs.joc.1c03116 ↗
19. Kayahara · Org. Lett. · 2012 · 14 · 328410.1021/ol301242t ↗
20. David · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 14710.1038/353147a0 ↗
21. P.Delhaes , Graphite and Precursors , CRC Press , 2001
22. González-Veloso · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1134710.1039/C8CP00503F ↗
23. Segawa · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 324410.1002/anie.201007232 ↗
24. Yuan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 516810.1021/jp5129657 ↗
25. Xu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 1341310.1021/jacs.8b08244 ↗
26. Stergiou · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2019 · 58 · 1774510.1002/anie.201909126 ↗
27. Tanuma · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1994610.1039/D1NR06393F ↗
28. Tang · Org. Electron. · 2020 · 83 · 10574710.1016/j.orgel.2020.105747 ↗
29. Xu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 1154910.1002/anie.201802443 ↗
30. Solymosi · Org. Mater. · 2022 · 4 · 7310.1055/a-1906-6875 ↗
31. Chang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2024 · 53 · 4710.1039/D2CS00937D ↗
32. Iwamoto · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2014 · 20 · 1440310.1002/chem.201403879 ↗
33. Nakanishi · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 310210.1002/anie.201311268 ↗
34. Zhao · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 1251410.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02451 ↗
35. Zhang · Carbon · 2020 · 161 · 69410.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.096 ↗
36. Zhang · Nanomaterials · 2022 · 12 · 140810.3390/nano12091408 ↗
37. Liang · Dalton Trans. · 2022 · 51 · 1022710.1039/D2DT00983H ↗
38. Stasyuk · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 1119510.1039/C9CC05787K ↗
39. Ueno · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 370710.1002/anie.201500544 ↗
40. Freiberger · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 566510.1039/D2NR07166E ↗
41. González-Veloso · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 3167010.1039/C6CP06209A ↗
42. Liu · RSC Adv. · 2023 · 13 · 455310.1039/D2RA08153A ↗
43. Schwer · Org. Mater. · 2022 · 4 · 710.1055/a-1814-7686 ↗
44. Elliott · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1088510.1021/ja052446r ↗
45. Cerón · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2013 · 19 · 741010.1002/chem.201204219 ↗
46. Campanera · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2002 · 106 · 1235610.1021/jp021882m ↗
47. Krause · ChemPhysChem · 2006 · 7 · 173410.1002/cphc.200600139 ↗
48. Zhang · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2007 · 608 · 1510.1016/j.jelechem.2007.04.015 ↗
49. Johnson · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 649810.1021/ja100936w ↗
50. Sedlak · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2013 · 9 · 336410.1021/ct400036b ↗
51. Sure · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2015 · 11 · 378510.1021/acs.jctc.5b00296 ↗
52. Mardirossian · J. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 144 · 21411010.1063/1.4952647 ↗
53. Najibi · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2018 · 14 · 572510.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 ↗
54. Mardirossian · Mol. Phys. · 2017 · 115 · 231510.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 ↗
55. Becke · Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 38 · 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
56. Lee · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
57. Grimme · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
58. Grimme · J. Comput. Chem. · 2011 · 32 · 145610.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
59. Weigend · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 7 · 329710.1039/b508541a ↗
60. Weigend · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 105710.1039/b515623h ↗
61. Stevenson · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 5510.1038/43415 ↗
62. Valencia · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2009 · 15 · 1099710.1002/chem.200900728 ↗
63. Garcia-Borràs · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2013 · 19 · 1493110.1002/chem.201302202 ↗
64. Osuna · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2012 · 18 · 894410.1002/chem.201200940 ↗
65. Ma · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2018 · 122 · 101910.1021/acs.jpca.7b12018 ↗
66. Chaur · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 751410.1002/anie.200901746 ↗
67. Zalibera · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 514110.1021/jp811274g ↗