journal article·2024Open access

Troubleshooting the influence of trace chemical impurities on nanoparticle growth kinetics via electrochemical measurements

Gabriel C. Halford, Sean P. McDarby, Sebastian Hertle, Anne F. Kiely, Jessica T. Luu, Claire J. Wang, Michelle L. Personick

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 23

Abstract

Reproducibility issues resulting from particle growth solutions made with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactant from different lots and product lines in a newly developed synthesis of monometallic palladium (Pd) tetrahexahedra (THH) nanoparticles are investigated via a multi-pronged approach. Time-resolved electrochemical measurements of solution potential, variation of chemical parameters in colloidal synthesis, and correlation to electrodeposition syntheses are used together to uncover the effects of the unknown contaminants on the chemical reducing environment during nanoparticle growth. Iodide-a known impurity in commercial CTAB-is identified as one of the required components for equalizing the reducing environment across multiple CTAB sources. However, an additional component-acetone-is critical to establishing the growth kinetics necessary to enable the reproducible synthesis of THH in each of the CTAB formulations. In one CTAB variety, the powdered surfactant contains too much acetone, and drying of the as-received surfactant and re-addition of solvent is necessary for successful Pd THH synthesis. The relevance of solvent impurities to the reducing environment in aqueous nanoparticle synthesis is confirmed via electrochemical measurement approaches and solvent addition experiments. This work highlights the utility of real-time electrochemical potential measurements as a tool for benchmarking of nanoparticle syntheses and troubleshooting of reproducibility issues. The results additionally emphasize the importance of considering organic solvent impurities in powdered commercial reagents as a possible shape-determining factor during shaped nanomaterials synthesis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA

Department of Chemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. De Roo · Chem. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 576610.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01058 ↗
2. Lang · Chem. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 527310.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00945 ↗
3. Jharimune · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2021 · 143 · 18410.1021/jacs.0c08528 ↗
4. Liz-Marzán · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 635910.1021/acsnano.0c04709 ↗
5. Abutbul · Nanotechnology · 2020 · 32 · 10200110.1088/1361-6528/abc0c7 ↗
6. Rayavarapu · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 505010.1021/la100166f ↗
7. Smith · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 64410.1021/la703625a ↗
8. Millstone · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 252610.1021/nl8016253 ↗
9. Alba-Rubio · J. Catal. · 2024 · 429 · 11525910.1016/j.jcat.2023.115259 ↗
10. Lang · Nanotechnology · 2021 · 33 · 08250110.1088/1361-6528/ac39cb ↗
11. Scarabelli · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 427010.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02123 ↗
12. King · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1561210.1039/C9NR04647J ↗
13. Satyavolu · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 292310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00275 ↗
14. Ye · Science · 2016 · 354 · 87410.1126/science.aah4434 ↗
15. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2014 · 140 · 34510.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.147 ↗
16. Ming · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1635010.1021/ja907549n ↗
17. Tian · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 758010.1021/ja102177r ↗
18. Lin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 931110.1021/ja404371k ↗
19. McDarby · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 2132210.1021/jacs.0c07987 ↗
20. Smith · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 951810.1021/la900757s ↗
21. Ghosh · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 780410.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00158 ↗
22. Du · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2021 · 12 · 665410.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01713 ↗
23. Langille · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1454210.1021/ja305245g ↗
24. Magnussen · Chem. Rev. · 2002 · 102 · 67910.1021/cr000069p ↗
25. Lipkowski · Electrochim. Acta · 1998 · 43 · 287510.1016/S0013-4686(98)00028-0 ↗
26. Xia · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 794710.1021/jacs.5b04641 ↗
27. Kim · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2022 · 13 · 834410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02377 ↗
28. Babij · Org. Process Res. Dev. · 2016 · 20 · 66110.1021/acs.oprd.5b00417 ↗
29. Bibi · Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. · 2021 · 16 · e271810.1002/apj.2718 ↗
30. Hossain · Chem. Phys. Lipids · 2021 · 238 · 10509110.1016/j.chemphyslip.2021.105091 ↗
31. Golmohammadi · J. Solution Chem. · 2020 · 49 · 1610.1007/s10953-019-00935-6 ↗
32. Nguyen · Biophys. J. · 2019 · 116 · 75510.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.021 ↗
33. Sood · Arabian J. Chem. · 2019 · 12 · 384710.1016/j.arabjc.2015.12.009 ↗
34. Jiang · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2018 · 509 · 2510.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.090 ↗
35. Setiawan · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2014 · 118 · 53710.1021/jp410305m ↗
36. Posokhov · Comput. Biol. Chem. · 2013 · 46 · 2310.1016/j.compbiolchem.2013.04.005 ↗
37. Sidim · J. Surfactants Deterg. · 2013 · 16 · 60110.1007/s11743-012-1429-x ↗
38. Ingólfsson · Biophys. J. · 2011 · 101 · 84710.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.013 ↗
39. Gurtovenko · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 198310.1021/jp808041z ↗
40. Wang · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2009 · 54 · 144710.1021/je800657m ↗
41. Patra · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 90 · 112110.1529/biophysj.105.062364 ↗
42. Niu · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 198710.1021/nn100093y ↗
43. Sonmez · PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e7657910.1371/journal.pone.0076579 ↗
44. Nishikido · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1974 · 47 · 263410.1246/bcsj.47.2634 ↗