Relative biomembrane fusogenicities of the tumor-selective liposomes of RGDK- and CGKRK-lipopeptides
Source abstract
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally after heart diseases. Currently used highly cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs not only kill cancer cells but also often kill non-cancerous healthy body cells, causing adverse side effects. Efforts are now being directed towards developing tumor-selective chemotherapy. Tumor/tumor endothelial cell selective peptide ligands are being covalently grafted onto the exo-surfaces of drug carriers such as liposomes, polymers, etc. A number of prior studies used conjugation of tumor/tumor endothelial cell-selective RGDK- or CGKRK-peptide ligands on the outer surfaces of liposomes, metal-based nanoparticles, single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), etc. However, studies aimed at examining the relative cell membrane fusogenicities and the relative degrees of cellular uptake for the RGDK- and CGKRK-ligand-grafted nanometric drug carriers have not yet been undertaken. Herein, using the widely used liposomes of DOPC, DOPE, DOPS and cholesterol (45 : 25 : 20 : 15, w/w ratio) as the model biomembranes and the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay for measuring membrane fusogenicities, we show that the liposomes of the RGDK-lipopeptide are more biomembrane fusogenic than the liposomes of the CGKRK-lipopeptide. Notably, such FRET assay-derived relative biomembrane fusogenicities of the liposomes of RGDK- and CGKRK-lipopeptides were found to be consistent with their relative degrees of cellular uptake in cultured cancer cells. The present findings open the door for undertaking in-depth in vivo studies aimed at evaluating the relative therapeutic potential of different nanocarriers of drugs/genes/siRNA having tumor-targeting RGDK- and CGKRK-peptides on their exo-surfaces.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cell Adhesion Molecules Research · Cell death mechanisms and regulation · Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, Nadia-741246, West Bengal, India
Funding
Indian Council of Medical Research · Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Conner · Nature · 2003 · 422 · 3710.1038/nature01451 ↗
2. Degors · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2019 · 52 · 175010.1021/acs.accounts.9b00177 ↗
3. Worm · Pept. Sci. · 2020 · 112 · e2417110.1002/pep2.24171 ↗
4. Lv · Front. Pharmacol. · 2020 · 11 · 55810.3389/fphar.2020.00558 ↗
5. Dinakar · Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. · 2023 · 1867 · 13039610.1016/j.bbagen.2023.130396 ↗
6. Mojarad-Jabali · Expert Opin. Drug Delivery · 2022 · 19 · 68510.1080/17425247.2022.2083106 ↗
7. Mondal · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 624910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.065 ↗
8. Ruoslahti · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 374710.1002/adma.201200454 ↗
9. Dechantsreiter · J. Med. Chem. · 1999 · 42 · 303310.1021/jm970832g ↗
10. Heckmann · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 357110.1002/anie.200700008 ↗
11. Haubner · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 746110.1021/ja9603721 ↗
12. Chen · Theranostics · 2011 · 1 · 18910.7150/thno/v01p0189 ↗
13. Sugahara · Cancer Cell · 2009 · 16 · 51010.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013 ↗
14. Samanta · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 178710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.027 ↗
15. Pramanik · J. Med. Chem. · 2008 · 51 · 729810.1021/jm800915y ↗
16. Mondal · J. Controlled Release · 2013 · 172 · 83210.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.302 ↗
17. Barui · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 164310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.074 ↗
18. Majumder · J. Controlled Release · 2014 · 180 · 10010.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.012 ↗
19. Das · ChemMedChem · 2017 · 12 · 73810.1002/cmdc.201700085 ↗
20. Vangala · Mol. Pharm. · 2020 · 17 · 185910.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01271 ↗
21. Hoffman · Cancer Cell · 2003 · 4 · 38310.1016/S1535-6108(03)00273-3 ↗
22. Griffin · Nanomedicine · 2017 · 13 · 192510.1016/j.nano.2017.04.004 ↗
23. Zhang · J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 15 · 154610.1166/jbn.2019.2788 ↗
24. Gulla · ACS Omega · 2018 · 3 · 866310.1021/acsomega.8b01051 ↗
25. Barui · Biomater. Sci. · 2023 · 11 · 613510.1039/D3BM00702B ↗
26. Treps · J. Pathol. · 2018 · 246 · 310.1002/path.5103 ↗
27. Lv · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2016 · 13 · 350610.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00523 ↗
28. Rahaman · Biomed. Mater. · 2024 · 19 · 01500410.1088/1748-605X/ad08df ↗
29. Hazra · Langmuir · 2023 · 39 · 1703110.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01617 ↗
30. Rajesh · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1140810.1021/ja0704683 ↗
31. Li · J. Hematol. Oncol. · 2022 · 15 · 12110.1186/s13045-022-01341-0 ↗
32. Bianchini · Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. · 2022 · 19 · 9110.1038/s41571-021-00565-2 ↗
33. Wahba · Cancer Biol. Med. · 2015 · 12 · 106
34. Gulz · Ann. Oncol. · 2009 · 20 · 191310.1093/annonc/mdp492 ↗
35. Leon-Ferre · Br. Med. J. · 2023 · 381 · e07167410.1136/bmj-2022-071674 ↗
36. Wittrup · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2015 · 33 · 87010.1038/nbt.3298 ↗
37. Senapati · Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. · 2018 · 3 · 710.1038/s41392-017-0004-3 ↗
38. Kunisawa · J. Controlled Release · 2005 · 105 · 34410.1016/j.jconrel.2005.03.020 ↗
39. Hoffmann · Pharmaceutics · 2023 · 15 · 121010.3390/pharmaceutics15041210 ↗
40. Kube · Langmuir · 2017 · 33 · 105110.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04304 ↗
41. Yang · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2016 · 2 · 62110.1021/acscentsci.6b00172 ↗
42. Weis · Nat. Med. · 2011 · 17 · 135910.1038/nm.2537 ↗
43. Desgrosellier · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2010 · 10 · 910.1038/nrc2748 ↗