journal article·2024Open access

Graphene oxide films as a novel tool for the modulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity in the context of multiple sclerosis

Celia Camacho-Toledano, Isabel Machín-Díaz, Rafael Lebrón-Galán, Ankor González-Mayorga, Francisco J. Palomares, María C. Serrano, Diego Clemente

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 15

Abstract

Despite the pharmacological arsenal approved for Multiple Sclerosis (MS), there are treatment-reluctant patients for whom cell therapy appears as the only therapeutic alternative. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are immature cells of the innate immunity able to control the immune response and to promote oligodendroglial differentiation in the MS animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). However, when isolated and cultured for cell therapy purposes, MDSCs lose their beneficial immunomodulatory properties. To prevent this important drawback, culture devices need to be designed so that MDSCs maintain a state of immaturity and immunosuppressive function similar to that exerted in the donor organism. With this aim, we select graphene oxide (GO) as a promising candidate as it has been described as a biocompatible nanomaterial with the capacity to biologically modulate different cell types, yet its immunoactive potential has been poorly explored to date. In this work, we have fabricated GO films with two distintive redox and roughness properties and explore their impact in MDSC culture right after isolation. Our results show that MDSCs isolated from immune organs of EAE mice maintain an immature phenotype and highly immunosuppressive activity on T lymphocytes after being cultured on highly-reduced GO films (rGO200) compared to those grown on conventional glass coverslips. This immunomodulation effect is depleted when MDSCs are exposed to slightly rougher and more oxidized GO substrates (rGO90), in which cells experience a significant reduction in cell size associated with the activation of apoptosis. Taken together, the exposure of MDSCs to GO substrates with different redox state and roughness is presented as a good strategy to control MDSC activity in vitro. The versatility of GO nanomaterials in regards to the impact of their physico-chemical properties in immunomodulation opens the door to their selective therapeutic potential for pathologies where MDSCs need to be enhanced (MS) or inhibited (cancer).
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Neuroimmune-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (HNP), SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071-Toledo, Spain

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Carlos III Health Institute, Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029-Madrid, Spain

Laboratory of Interfaces for Neural Repair, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071- Toledo, Spain

Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049-Madrid, Spain

Design and development of biomaterials for neural regeneration, HNP, Associated Unit to CSIC through ICMM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071-Toledo, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad · Instituto de Salud Carlos III

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Walton · Mult. Scler. J. · 2020 · 26 · 181610.1177/1352458520970841 ↗
2. Hauser · Am. J. Med. · 2020 · 133 · 138010.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049 ↗
3. Freeman · CNS Drugs · 2022 · 36 · 128510.1007/s40263-022-00965-7 ↗
4. Arrambide · Mult. Scler. J. · 2020 · 26 · 104510.1177/1352458520924595 ↗
5. Miller · JAMA Neurol. · 2021 · 78 · 24110.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4025 ↗
6. Calahorra · Biomedicines · 2022 · 10 · 110.3390/biomedicines10020335 ↗
7. Radojević · Gut Microbes · 2022 · 14 · 110.1080/19490976.2022.2127455 ↗
8. Camacho-Toledano · J. Neuroinflammation · 2022 · 19 · 110.1186/s12974-022-02635-3 ↗
9. Moliné-Velázquez · Neurobiol. Dis. · 2014 · 67 · 14910.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.017 ↗
10. Zhu · J. Immunol. · 2007 · 179 · 522810.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5228 ↗
11. Moliné-Velázquez · Brain Pathol. · 2011 · 21 · 67810.1111/j.1750-3639.2011.00495.x ↗
12. Knier · Nat. Immunol. · 2018 · 19 · 134110.1038/s41590-018-0237-5 ↗
13. Melero-Jerez · Neurobiol. Dis. · 2019 · 127 · 1310.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.014 ↗
14. Melero-Jerez · Glia · 2021 · 69 · 90510.1002/glia.23936 ↗
15. Hafner · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2014 · 9 · 1005
16. Orecchioni · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2016 · 105 · 16310.1016/j.addr.2016.05.014 ↗
17. Palmieri · Nanoscale Horiz. · 2019 · 4 · 46410.1039/C8NH00318A ↗
18. Lin · J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B · 2021 · 56 · 33310.1080/03601234.2021.1885262 ↗
19. Yan · Colloids Surf., B · 2017 · 153 · 30010.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.02.036 ↗
20. Cicuéndez · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2021 · 22 · 670110.3390/ijms22136701 ↗
21. Dai · Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. · 2017 · 36 · 464
22. Pondman · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 109710.1039/C6NR08807D ↗
23. Halim · Nanomaterials · 2018 · 8 · 73610.3390/nano8090736 ↗
24. Della Pelle · Appl. Mater. Today · 2017 · 9 · 2910.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.012 ↗
25. Domínguez-Bajo · Biomaterials · 2019 · 192 · 46110.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.024 ↗
26. Aliaga-Gaspar · Front. Immunol. · 2021 · 12 · 77820410.3389/fimmu.2021.778204 ↗
27. Veglia · Nat. Rev. Immunol. · 2021 · 21 · 48510.1038/s41577-020-00490-y ↗
28. Melero-Jerez · Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Basis Dis. · 2016 · 1862 · 36810.1016/j.bbadis.2015.10.015 ↗
29. Zhu · J. Immunol. · 2011 · 187 · 241810.4049/jimmunol.1100403 ↗
30. Kou · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2011 · 96 · 23910.1002/jbm.a.32971 ↗
31. Zhou · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 4740710.1021/acsami.1c16154 ↗
32. He · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2450610.1038/srep24506 ↗
33. Escudero · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2020 · 109 · 110.1016/j.msec.2019.110522 ↗
34. Qu · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 573210.1021/nn402330b ↗
35. Sasidharan · Small · 2012 · 8 · 125110.1002/smll.201102393 ↗
36. Orecchioni · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2016 · 5 · 27610.1002/adhm.201500606 ↗
37. Botas · Carbon · 2013 · 52 · 47610.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.059 ↗
38. Wang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2013 · 8 · 1733
39. Hung · Nanomaterials · 2021 · 11 · 204610.3390/nano11082046 ↗
40. Zhou · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 693310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.064 ↗
41. Svadlakova · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2022 · 23 · 110.3390/ijms23168889 ↗
42. Russier · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 1123410.1039/c3nr03543c ↗
43. Fusco · NanoImpact · 2021 · 23 · 10033010.1016/j.impact.2021.100330 ↗
44. Zamorina · Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. · 2020 · 170 · 8410.1007/s10517-020-05009-y ↗
45. Feito · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2014 · 432 · 22110.1016/j.jcis.2014.07.004 ↗
46. Xu · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 378510.1039/C5NR09208F ↗
47. Yali · Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. · 2017 · 36 · 464
48. Pondman · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 109710.1039/C6NR08807D ↗
49. Meng · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 318010.1021/am507649n ↗
50. Wan · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31 · 201062610.1002/adfm.202010626 ↗
51. Xiaoli · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2021 · 416 · 12615810.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126158 ↗
52. Li · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 139010.1021/acsnano.7b07737 ↗
53. Chen · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 59 · 8210.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.003 ↗
54. Lyu · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 695910.1039/c4nr01540a ↗
55. Wu · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1463710.1039/C8NR02798F ↗
56. Li · Theranostics · 2023 · 13 · 538610.7150/thno.87854 ↗