Thermal dynamics of few-layer-graphene seals
Source abstract
Abstract
Being of atomic thickness, graphene is the thinnest imaginable membrane. While graphene's basal plane is highly impermeable at the molecular level, the impermeability is, in practice, compromised by leakage pathways located at the graphene-substrate interface. Here, we provide a kinetic analysis of such interface-mediated leakage by probing gas trapped in graphene-sealed SiO2 cavities versus time and temperature using electron energy loss spectroscopy. The results show that gas leakage exhibits an Arrhenius-type temperature dependency with apparent activation energies between 0.2 and 0.7 eV. Surprisingly, the interface leak rate can be improved by several orders of magnitude by thermal processing, which alters the kinetic parameters of the temperature dependency. The present study thus provides fundamental insight into the leakage mechanism while simultaneously demonstrating thermal processing as a generic approach for tightening graphene-based-seals with applications within chemistry and biology.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Visualizing Catalytic Processes (VISION), Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Surface Physics and Catalysis (SURFCAT), Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
National Centre for Nano Fabrication and Characterization (Nanolab), Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Funding
H2020 European Research Council · Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu · Nature · 2014 · 516 · 22710.1038/nature14015 ↗
2. A. M.Hurst , S.Lee , N.Petrone , J.VanDeWeert , A. M.van der Zande and J.Hone
3. Zhu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 16190410.1063/1.4802799 ↗
4. Smith · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 323710.1021/nl401352k ↗
5. Wang · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 766310.1039/C5NR09274D ↗
6. Li · Science · 2013 · 342 · 9510.1126/science.1236686 ↗
7. Kim · Science · 2013 · 342 · 9110.1126/science.1236098 ↗
8. Nair · Science · 2012 · 335 · 44210.1126/science.1211694 ↗
9. Koenig · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 72810.1038/nnano.2012.162 ↗
10. Weatherup · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 162210.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00640 ↗
11. Chen · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 132110.1021/nn103028d ↗
12. Wang · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 78510.1038/nnano.2015.158 ↗
13. Bunch · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 245810.1021/nl801457b ↗
14. Manzanares-Negro · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 3775010.1021/acsami.0c09765 ↗
15. Lee · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 531310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01770 ↗
16. Sun · Nature · 2020 · 579 · 22910.1038/s41586-020-2070-x ↗
17. Sun · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 717010.1038/s41467-021-27347-9 ↗
18. Crozier · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 17710.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.005 ↗
19. Vendelbo · Ultramicroscopy · 2013 · 133 · 7210.1016/j.ultramic.2013.04.004 ↗
20. R. F.Egerton , Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the electron microscope , Springer , 201110.1007/978-1-4419-9583-4 ↗
21. Koenig · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 54310.1038/nnano.2011.123 ↗
22. Liu · J. Chem. Phys. · 2022 · 157 · 19110110.1063/5.0122356 ↗
23. Jinschek · Micron · 2012 · 43 · 115610.1016/j.micron.2012.01.006 ↗
24. Bosman · Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 108 · 83710.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.003 ↗