Chemical potential gradient induced formation of Kirkendall voids at the epitaxial TiN/MgO interface
Source abstract
Abstract
We report the observation of Kirkendall voids at the epitaxial titanium nitride (TiN)/magnesium oxide(MgO)(001) interface. While epitaxial growth of TiN on MgO has been known for years, many reports show a perfectly sharp epitaxial interface. Because TiN is a prototypical diffusion barrier material, observing the consequence of rapid diffusion at a TiN interface is interesting. Structural characterization of the interface using X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy confirms the diffuse nature of the interface. Rectangular voids that form at the TiN/MgO(001) interface and extend into both TiN and MgO result from a large chemical potential gradient at the interface, which contributes a strong chemical driving force for diffusion. The spatial localization of the observed voids is limited to within ∼10 nm from the interface, consistent with a chemical potential gradient driving force. A composition gradient on the nanometer scale is also observed. Observation of Kirkendall voids at this nitride/oxide interface suggests possibilities for engineering oxygen and nitrogen vacancies at thin film interfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Szyjka · ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 315210.1021/acsaelm.0c00503 ↗
2. Nishimura · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 55 · 08PB0110.7567/JJAP.55.08PB01 ↗
3. Lomenzo · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2014 · 32 · 03D12310.1116/1.4873323 ↗
4. Triyoso · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 13290310.1063/1.2357032 ↗
5. Petzold · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 5 · 190048410.1002/aelm.201900484 ↗
6. Lee · ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2021 · 3 · 99910.1021/acsaelm.0c01079 ↗
7. Hegde · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 288210.1063/1.113461 ↗
8. Shang · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2004 · 25 · 13510.1109/LED.2003.823060 ↗
9. Thangala · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2009 · 9 · 317710.1021/cg801198p ↗
10. Wang · Small · 2021 · 17 · 200722210.1002/smll.202007222 ↗
11. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 125310.1021/acsami.0c18431 ↗
12. Calka · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 08570610.1088/0957-4484/24/8/085706 ↗
13. Chang · Thin Solid Films · 2022 · 753 · 13927410.1016/j.tsf.2022.139274 ↗
14. Starschich · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 03290310.1063/1.4940370 ↗
15. He · Phys. Rev. B · 2021 · 104 · L18010210.1103/PhysRevB.104.L180102 ↗
16. Yong · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2021 · 551 · 14938610.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149386 ↗
17. Qiao · Mater. Sci. Eng., R · 2021 · 145 · 10062210.1016/j.mser.2021.100622 ↗
18. Hultman · J. Cryst. Growth · 1988 · 92 · 63910.1016/0022-0248(88)90048-6 ↗
19. Biunno · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 55 · 40510.1063/1.101881 ↗
20. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 855 · 14388910.1016/j.msea.2022.143889 ↗
21. Zhang · Materialia · 2020 · 12 · 10074810.1016/j.mtla.2020.100748 ↗
22. Su · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 189 · 11025710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110257 ↗
23. Chen · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 15540110.1103/PhysRevB.69.155401 ↗
24. Li · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 105 · 8310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.005 ↗
25. Hultman · J. Mater. Res. · 1989 · 4 · 126610.1557/JMR.1989.1266 ↗
26. Hultman · J. Mater. Res. · 1991 · 6 · 174410.1557/JMR.1991.1744 ↗
27. Wei · Mater. Lett. · 2018 · 213 · 22710.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.045 ↗
28. Miyagawa · J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 72 · 566310.1063/1.351915 ↗
29. Braic · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 2985710.1021/acsami.7b07660 ↗
30. Chappé · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 253 · 531210.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.004 ↗
31. Huang · Mater. Today Phys. · 2021 · 16 · 10031610.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100316 ↗
32. Chen · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2014 · 9 · 55110.1186/1556-276X-9-551 ↗
33. Wei · Thin Solid Films · 2016 · 618 · 810.1016/j.tsf.2016.07.037 ↗
34. Hultman · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 53610.1063/1.343570 ↗
35. Xue · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 4186310.1021/acsami.7b12886 ↗
36. Reeves · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1982 · 3 · 11110.1109/EDL.1982.25502 ↗
37. Kirchhoff · Ann. Phys. · 1845 · 140 · 49710.1002/andp.18451400402 ↗
38. Seefeld · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1980 · 27 · 87310.1109/T-ED.1980.19949 ↗
39. Ponon · Thin Solid Films · 2015 · 578 · 3110.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.009 ↗
40. Hultman · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1992 · 10 · 161810.1116/1.578032 ↗
41. Lei · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 11491510.1063/1.2397282 ↗
42. Meng · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 309810.1002/chem.201605133 ↗
43. Nakanishi · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 244 · 35910.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.091 ↗
44. Han · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1056810.1039/c4ta01469c ↗
45. Han · Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) · 2017 · 30 · 110010.1007/s40195-017-0636-x ↗
46. Tang · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 439010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01460 ↗