journal article·2022

An insight into embryogenesis interruption by carbon nitride dots: can they be nucleobase analogs?

Yiqun Zhou, Jiuyan Chen, Emel Kirbas Cilingir, Wei Zhang, Lemay Gonzalez, Samuel Perez, Arjuna Davila, Nicholas Brejcha, Jun Gu, Wenquan Shi, Justin B. Domena, Braulio C. L. B. Ferreira, Fuwu Zhang, Frederic A. Vallejo, Daniela Toledo, Piumi Y. Liyanage, Regina M. Graham, Julia Dallman, Zhili Peng, Christian Agatemor, Alessandro Catenazzi, Roger M. Leblanc

Nanoscale· Volume 14· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

The carbon nitride dot (CND) is an emerging carbon-based nanomaterial. It possesses rich surface functional moieties and a carbon nitride core. Spectroscopic data have demonstrated the analogy between CNDs and cytosine/uracil. Recently, it was found that CNDs could interrupt the normal embryogenesis of zebrafish. Modifying CNDs with various nucleobases, especially cytosine, further decreased embryo viability and increased deformities. Physicochemical property characterization demonstrated that adenine- and cytosine-incorporated CNDs are similar but different from guanine-, thymine- and uracil-incorporated CNDs in many properties, morphology, and structure. To investigate the embryogenesis interruption at the cellular level, bare and different nucleobase-incorporated CNDs were applied to normal and cancerous cell lines. A dose-dependent decline was observed in the viability of normal and cancerous cells incubated with cytosine-incorporated CNDs, which matched results from the zebrafish embryogenesis experiment. In addition, nucleobase-incorporated CNDs were observed to enter cell nuclei, demonstrating a possibility of CND–DNA interactions. CNDs modified by complementary nucleobases could bind each other via hydrogen bonds, which suggests nucleobase-incorporated CNDs can potentially bind the complementary nucleobases in a DNA double helix. Nonetheless, neither bare nor nucleobase-incorporated CNDs were observed to intervene in the amplification of the zebrafish polymerase-alpha 1 gene in quantitative polymerase chain reactions. Thus, in conclusion, the embryogenesis interruption by bare and nucleobase-incorporated CNDs might not be a consequence of CND–DNA interactions during DNA replication. Instead, CND–Ca 2+ interactions offer a plausible mechanism that hindered cell proliferation and zebrafish embryogenesis originating from disturbed Ca 2+ homeostasis by CNDs. Eventually, the hypothesis that raw or nucleobase-incorporated CNDs can be nucleobase analogs proved to be invalid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA

C-Dots, LLC, Miami, FL 33136, USA

Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA

Miami Dade College North Campus, Miami, FL 33167, USA

National Center for International Research on Photoelectric and Energy Materials, School of Materials and Energy, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091, People's Republic of China

Department of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA

Indium Corporation of America, Clinton, NY 13323, USA

Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. N. V.Bhagavan and C.-E.Ha , in Essentials of Medical Biochemistry , ed. N. V. Bhagavan and C.-E. Ha , Academic Press , San Diego , 2nd edn, 2015 , pp. 381–40010.1016/B978-0-12-416687-5.00021-X ↗
2. O.Modén and B.Mannervik , in Advances in Cancer Research , eds. D. M. Townsend and K. D. Tew , Academic Press , 2014 , vol. 122 , pp. 199–244
3. Tsesmetzis · Cancers · 2018 · 10 · 24010.3390/cancers10070240 ↗
4. T. R.Skopek , in Encyclopedia of Genetics , ed. S. Brenner and J. H. Miller , Academic Press , New York , 2001 , pp. 1264–126810.1006/rwgn.2001.0867 ↗
5. Y. Y.Polosina and C. G.Cupples , in Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics , ed. S. Maloy and K. Hughes , Academic Press , San Diego , 2nd edn, 2013 , pp. 525–52710.1016/B978-0-12-374984-0.00995-5 ↗
6. Jones · Q. Rev. Biophys. · 2015 · 48 · 24410.1017/S0033583514000158 ↗
7. Zhou · Polymers · 2017 · 9 · 6710.3390/polym9020067 ↗
8. Zhou · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 248 · 15710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.019 ↗
9. Liyanage · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2019 · 30 · 11110.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00784 ↗
10. Seven · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 670810.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00920 ↗
11. Mandelkern · J. Mol. Biol. · 1981 · 152 · 15310.1016/0022-2836(81)90099-1 ↗
12. Mintz · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 463410.1039/C8NR10059D ↗
13. Zhou · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 911510.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00595 ↗
14. Zheng · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 3231910.1039/C5RA01986A ↗
15. Kong · Cell Proliferation · 2018 · 51 · e1248810.1111/cpr.12488 ↗
16. Li · R. Soc. Open Sci. · 2019 · 6 · 18155710.1098/rsos.181557 ↗
17. Cailotto · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4056010.1021/acsami.8b14188 ↗
18. Zhou · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 2238710.1039/C9NR08194A ↗
19. Seven · Nanoscale Adv. · 2021 · 3 · 394210.1039/D1NA00145K ↗
20. Cilingir · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2021 · 592 · 48510.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.058 ↗
21. Jung · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1880710.1038/srep18807 ↗
22. Xia · Drug Discoveries Ther. · 2019 · 13 · 11410.5582/ddt.2019.01013 ↗
23. Dong · Theranostics · 2020 · 10 · 67110.7150/thno.39863 ↗
24. Feng · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2013 · 41 · 798710.1093/nar/gkt575 ↗
25. Khakbaz · Anal. Biochem. · 2017 · 523 · 3210.1016/j.ab.2017.01.025 ↗
26. Godavarthi · J. Photochem. Photobiol., B · 2017 · 172 · 3610.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.014 ↗
27. Cheng · Anal. Chem. · 2018 · 90 · 1135810.1021/acs.analchem.8b02301 ↗
28. Khan · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 48310.1021/acsanm.7b00175 ↗
29. Jhonsi · Spectrochim. Acta, Part A · 2018 · 196 · 29510.1016/j.saa.2018.02.030 ↗
30. Wang · ACS Appl. Bio Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 885710.1021/acsabm.0c01170 ↗
31. Schwartz · Plant Physiol. · 2020 · 184 · 64710.1104/pp.20.00733 ↗
32. Hou · Talanta · 2017 · 173 · 10710.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.071 ↗
33. Li · Spectrochim. Acta, Part A · 2021 · 248 · 11920810.1016/j.saa.2020.119208 ↗
34. Kokic · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 27910.1038/s41467-020-20542-0 ↗
35. de Sousa Cavalcante · Eur. J. Pharmacol. · 2014 · 741 · 810.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.041 ↗
36. Taymaz-Nikerel · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1367210.1038/s41598-018-31939-9 ↗
37. Ferreira · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 2020 · 64 · e01843-2010.1128/AAC.01843-20 ↗
38. Fukushima · Int. J. Hematol. · 1993 · 57 · 121
39. Wesolowski · Am. J. Neuroradiol. · 2010 · 31 · 138310.3174/ajnr.A2170 ↗
40. Gesto · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2012 · 19 · 107610.2174/092986712799320682 ↗
41. Langheinrich · BioEssays · 2003 · 25 · 90410.1002/bies.10326 ↗
42. Rudner · Oncogene · 2011 · 30 · 428910.1038/onc.2011.138 ↗
43. Outtandy · Pediatr. Nephrol. · 2019 · 34 · 75110.1007/s00467-018-3921-7 ↗
44. Li · Colloids Surf., B · 2016 · 145 · 25110.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.007 ↗
45. Avdesh · J. Visualized Exp. · 2012 · 69 · e4196
46. Meyers · Curr. Protoc. · 2018 · 16 · e19
47. Zhou · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2021 · 599 · 51910.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.121 ↗
48. Liyanage · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 792710.1039/D0NR01647K ↗
49. Zhou · Carbon · 2022 · 193 · 110.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.021 ↗
50. Milner · J. Nutr. · 1985 · 115 · 51610.1093/jn/115.4.516 ↗
51. Mintz · Carbon · 2021 · 173 · 43310.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.017 ↗
52. Fan · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 3718510.1039/C7RA05732F ↗
53. Ben-Refael · Catal. Today · 2020 · 340 · 9710.1016/j.cattod.2018.11.010 ↗
54. Wang · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2022 · 10 · 220067810.1002/adom.202200678 ↗
55. Zhang · RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 56710.1039/C7RA11578D ↗
56. Li · CrystEngComm · 2015 · 17 · 52010.1039/C4CE01632G ↗
57. Li · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 2259310.1039/C5RA00350D ↗
58. Ravi · Mater. Res. Express · 2018 · 5 · 05550110.1088/2053-1591/aabf68 ↗
59. Dai · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2013 · 38 · 10910.1016/j.diamond.2013.06.012 ↗
60. Chen · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 301 · 42810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.093 ↗
61. Wang · ChemComm · 2012 · 48 · 976
62. Liu · Cell Tissue Res. · 2008 · 334 · 3710.1007/s00441-008-0664-y ↗
63. Lin · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2016 · 17 · 178310.3390/ijms17111783 ↗
64. Harjunpää · Front. Immunol. · 2019 · 10 · 107810.3389/fimmu.2019.01078 ↗
65. Hassan · Arabian J. Chem. · 2021 · 14 · 10345210.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103452 ↗
66. Zoupa · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2017 · 18 · 81710.3390/ijms18040817 ↗
67. Mansoori · Adv. Pharm. Bull. · 2017 · 7 · 33910.15171/apb.2017.041 ↗
68. Stupp · N. Engl. J. Med. · 2005 · 352 · 98710.1056/NEJMoa043330 ↗
69. Galmarini · Lancet Oncol. · 2002 · 3 · 41510.1016/S1470-2045(02)00788-X ↗