journal article·2022

Binding of polar and hydrophobic molecules at the LiCoO 2 (001)-water interface: force field development and molecular dynamics simulations

Dongyue Liang, Juan Liu, Hendrik Heinz, Sara E. Mason, Robert J. Hamers, Qiang Cui

Nanoscale· Volume 14· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

A classical model in the framework of the INTERFACE force field has been developed for treating the LiCoO2 (LCO) (001)/water interface. In comparison to ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations based on density functional theory, MD simulations using the classical model lead to generally reliable descriptions of interfacial properties, such as the density distribution of water molecules. Water molecules in close contact with the LCO surface form a strongly adsorbed layer, which leads to a free energy barrier for the adsorption of polar or charged molecules to the LCO surface. Moreover, due to the strong hydrogen bonding interactions with the LCO surface, the first water layer forms an interface that exhibits hydrophobic characters, leading to favorable adsorption of non-polar molecules to the interface. Therefore, despite its highly polar nature, the LCO (001) surface binds not only polar/charged but also non-polar solutes. As an application, the model is used to analyze the adsorption of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and its molecular components to the LCO (001) surface in water. The results suggest that recently observed redox activity of NADH at the LCO/water interface was due to the co-operativity between the ribose component, which drives binding to the LCO surface, and the nicotinamide moiety, which undergoes oxidation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado–Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303-0596, USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, China

Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, E331 Chemistry Building, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Departments of Chemistry, Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, MA 02215, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Ho · Nano · 2014 · 9 · 143000210.1142/S1793292014300023 ↗
2. Mei · J. Energy Chem. · 2018 · 27 · 11710.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.012 ↗
3. Mei · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 170017610.1002/adma.201700176 ↗
4. Hamers · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2017 · 50 · 63310.1021/acs.accounts.6b00634 ↗
5. Zeng · Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. · 2015 · 52 · 175910.1016/j.rser.2015.08.014 ↗
6. Hang · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 109210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04505 ↗
7. Hang · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 172110.1021/acsanm.8b00187 ↗
8. Laudadio · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 1664010.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02708 ↗
9. Laudadio · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 52 · 1018610.1021/acs.est.8b02324 ↗
10. Henke · Environ. Sci. Nano · 2021 · 8 · 174910.1039/D0EN01221A ↗
11. Nolan · Joule · 2018 · 2 · 201610.1016/j.joule.2018.08.017 ↗
12. Giri · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 190385710.1002/adfm.201903857 ↗
13. Chakraborty · Chem. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 91510.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04066 ↗
14. Mori · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2013 · 9 · 505910.1021/ct400487e ↗
15. Serva · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2021 · 118 · e202386711810.1073/pnas.2023867118 ↗
16. Hafner · J. Comput. Chem. · 2008 · 29 · 204410.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
17. Bennett · Environ. Sci. Nano · 2017 · 4 · 142810.1039/C7EN90025B ↗
18. Wang · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2021 · e1537
19. B.Kirchner , P. J.di Dio and J.Hutter , Real-world predictions from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations , Multiscale Molecular Methods in Applied Chemistry , 2011 , pp. 109–15310.1007/128_2011_195 ↗
20. Schran · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2021 · 118 · e211007711810.1073/pnas.2110077118 ↗
21. Behler · Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 121 · 1003710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868 ↗
22. MacKerell Jr. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 358610.1021/jp973084f ↗
23. Mackerell Jr. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2004 · 25 · 140010.1002/jcc.20065 ↗
24. Cornell · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 517910.1021/ja00124a002 ↗
25. Dhakane · Surf. Interfaces · 2020 · 21 · 10067410.1016/j.surfin.2020.100674 ↗
26. Giannozzi · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2017 · 29 · 465901
27. Giannozzi · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 395502
28. Tang · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 084204
29. Sanville · J. Comput. Chem. · 2007 · 28 · 89910.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
30. Henkelman · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 36 · 35410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
31. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
32. Hubbard · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 1963 · 276 · 23810.1098/rspa.1963.0204 ↗
33. Bennett · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 170 · 10913710.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109137 ↗
34. Vanderbilt · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
35. Garrity · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 81 · 44610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053 ↗
36. Huang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 506910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12163 ↗
37. Abbaspour-Tamijani · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 515 · 14586510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145865 ↗
38. Gao · Comput. Optim. Appl. · 2012 · 51 · 25910.1007/s10589-010-9329-3 ↗
39. Virtanen · Nat. Methods · 2020 · 17 · 26110.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
40. Brooks · J. Comput. Chem. · 2009 · 30 · 154510.1002/jcc.21287 ↗
41. Darden · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 1008910.1063/1.464397 ↗
42. Lippert · Mol. Phys. · 1997 · 92 · 47710.1080/00268979709482119 ↗
43. Kḧne · J. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 152 · 19410310.1063/5.0007045 ↗
44. Ehrlich · ChemPhysChem · 2011 · 12 · 341410.1002/cphc.201100521 ↗
45. Phillips · J. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 153 · 04413010.1063/5.0014475 ↗
46. Jorgensen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
47. Neria · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 105 · 190210.1063/1.472061 ↗
48. Noskov · J. Mol. Biol. · 2008 · 377 · 80410.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.015 ↗
49. Luo · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 18310.1021/jz900079w ↗
50. L.Landau and E.Lifshitz , Statistical Physics, Part 1 , Elsevier , Oxford, UK , 3rd edn, 1980 , vol. 5
51. Laio · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2008 · 71 · 12660110.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601 ↗
52. Barducci · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 02060310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 ↗
53. Price · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 121 · 1009610.1063/1.1808117 ↗
54. Toukan · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1985 · 31 · 264310.1103/PhysRevB.31.2643 ↗
55. Berendsen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 626910.1021/j100308a038 ↗
56. Vanommeslaeghe · J. Comput. Chem. · 2010 · 31 · 67110.1002/jcc.21367 ↗
57. Andrade · Chem. Sci. · 2020 · 11 · 233510.1039/C9SC05116C ↗
58. Chew · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 453410.1021/acsnano.0c08623 ↗
59. Willard · J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 141 · 18C51910.1063/1.4897249 ↗
60. Nalbach · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 2414410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09825 ↗
61. Patel · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 249810.1021/jp2107523 ↗
62. Cui · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2016 · 120 · 729710.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03976 ↗
63. Dasetty · Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 23 · 13810.1016/j.coche.2019.04.003 ↗
64. Kognole · J. Mol. Model. · 2020 · 26 · 110.1007/s00894-020-04399-0 ↗
65. Venable · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 1018310.1021/jp401512z ↗
66. Towns · Comput. Sci. Eng. · 2014 · 16 · 6210.1109/MCSE.2014.80 ↗