Predicting plasma conditions necessary for synthesis of γ-Al 2 O 3 nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonthermal plasma (NTP) offers a unique synthesis environment capable of producing nanocrystals of high melting point materials at relatively low gas temperatures. Despite the rapidly growing material library accessible through NTP synthesis, designing processes for new materials is predominantly empirically driven. Here, we report on the synthesis of both amorphous alumina and γ-Al2O3 nanocrystals and present a simple particle heating model that is suitable for predicting the plasma power necessary for crystallization. The heating model only requires the composition, temperature, and pressure of the background gas along with the reactor geometry to calculate the temperature of particles suspended in the plasma as a function of applied power. Complete crystallization of the nanoparticle population was observed when applied power was greater than the threshold where the calculated particle temperature is equal to the crystallization temperature of amorphous alumina.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Chemistry, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Funding
Army Research Office · National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Kortshagen · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 1106110.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00039 ↗
2. Kovalenko · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 101210.1021/nn506223h ↗
3. Bapat · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2004 · 46 · B9710.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/009 ↗
4. Mangolini · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 65510.1021/nl050066y ↗
5. Limpens · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 442610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00810 ↗
6. Gresback · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 09311910.1063/1.2778356 ↗
7. Hunter · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 85210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03025 ↗
8. Macias-Montero · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 662310.1039/C5NR07705B ↗
9. Pi · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 29560210.1088/0957-4484/20/29/295602 ↗
10. Yasar-Inceoglu · Mater. Lett. · 2013 · 101 · 7610.1016/j.matlet.2013.03.080 ↗
11. Rowe · APL Mater. · 2014 · 2 · 02210410.1063/1.4865158 ↗
12. Felbier · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 198810.1002/adfm.201303449 ↗
13. Thimsen · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 582210.1038/ncomms6822 ↗
14. Greenberg · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 816210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03600 ↗
15. Greenberg · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 463410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01078 ↗
16. Chen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 2516810.1021/acsami.0c05039 ↗
17. Graves · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 519610.1039/C9NR08886E ↗
18. Uner · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 3061310.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09555 ↗
19. Uner · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 53 · 09520110.1088/1361-6463/ab59e6 ↗
20. Uner · Plasma Processes Polym. · 2020 · 17 · 190023310.1002/ppap.201900233 ↗
21. Coleman · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 19330110.1063/1.4919918 ↗
22. Alvarez Barragan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 231610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08910 ↗
23. Coleman · ACS Omega · 2019 · 4 · 1008910.1021/acsomega.9b00933 ↗
24. Li · ACS Omega · 2020 · 5 · 2475410.1021/acsomega.0c03353 ↗
25. Askari · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1714110.1039/C6NR03702J ↗
26. Lopez · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 128610.1039/C3NR02526H ↗
27. Mangolini · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2009 · 79 · 02640510.1103/PhysRevE.79.026405 ↗
28. Uner · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 1293610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03572 ↗
29. Maurer · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 17402910.1088/0022-3727/44/17/174029 ↗
30. Kramer · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 07520210.1088/0022-3727/47/7/075202 ↗
31. Lopez · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Nanotechnol. Microelectron.: Mater., Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2014 · 32 · 061802
32. Alessi · Faraday Discuss. · 2020 · 222 · 39010.1039/C9FD00103D ↗
33. Kramer · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 03520510.1088/0022-3727/48/3/035205 ↗
34. Uner · Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 27 · 07400510.1088/1361-6595/aad36e ↗
35. Mangolini · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 37300310.1088/1361-6463/aa812e ↗
36. Lee · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 15010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03027 ↗
37. Mavrič · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2019 · 521 · 11949310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119493 ↗
38. Cendejas · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2020 · 39 · 01240610.1116/6.0000588 ↗
39. Lippmaa · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1986 · 108 · 173010.1021/ja00268a002 ↗
40. Massiot · Magn. Reson. Chem. · 2002 · 40 · 7010.1002/mrc.984 ↗
41. Kortshagen · Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. · 1999 · 60 · 88710.1103/PhysRevE.60.887 ↗
42. Daugherty · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1993 · 11 · 112610.1116/1.578452 ↗
43. York · Appl. Opt. · 1981 · 20 · 136010.1364/AO.20.001360 ↗
44. Kortshagen · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 24 · 157110.1088/0022-3727/24/9/009 ↗
45. Greenberg · Chem. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 1015510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03644 ↗
46. Lee · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1389010.1021/jp105306r ↗
47. Cui · Chem. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 745610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05078 ↗
48. Chandran · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2019 · 48 · 13410.1039/C8CS00321A ↗
49. Samain · J. Solid State Chem. · 2014 · 217 · 110.1016/j.jssc.2014.05.004 ↗
50. Czjzek · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1981 · 23 · 251310.1103/PhysRevB.23.2513 ↗
51. d'Espinose de Lacaillerie · J. Magn. Reson. · 2008 · 192 · 24410.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.001 ↗
52. Caër · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 065402