Bayesian optimization of glycopolymer structures for the interaction with cholera toxin B subunit
Source abstract
Abstract
The optimal structure of synthetic glycopolymers for GM1 mimetics was determined through Bayesian optimization. The interactions of glycopolymers carrying galactose and neuraminic acid units in different compositions with cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) were assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Gaussian process regression, using the ELISA results, predicted the composition of glycopolymers that would exhibit stronger interactions with CTB. Following five cycles of optimization, the glycopolymers carrying 60 mol% galactose and 25 mol% neuraminic acid demonstrated an IC50 value of 75 μM for CTB, representing the lowest value among the synthesized glycopolymers.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chemical Synthesis and Analysis · Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research · Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Nicolaou · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 518510.1039/c2cs35116a ↗
2. Kent · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 33810.1039/B700141J ↗
3. Schwizer · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 14210.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00014 ↗
4. Imberty · Chem. Rev. · 2000 · 100 · 456710.1021/cr990343j ↗
5. Turnbull · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 104710.1021/ja0378207 ↗
6. Zuilhof · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2016 · 49 · 27410.1021/acs.accounts.5b00480 ↗
7. Sasaki · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 446310.1002/1521-3773(20021202)41:23<4463::AID-ANIE4463>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
8. Nishida · Biomacromolecules · 2000 · 1 · 6810.1021/bm990011o ↗
9. Terada · Chem. - Asian J. · 2019 · 14 · 102110.1002/asia.201900053 ↗
10. Nagao · Chem. Commun. · 2021 · 57 · 1087110.1039/D1CC04394C ↗
11. Bergstra · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2012 · 13 · 281
12. Sanchez-Lengeling · Science · 2018 · 361 · 36010.1126/science.aat2663 ↗
13. Raccuglia · Nature · 2016 · 533 · 7310.1038/nature17439 ↗
14. Sigman · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2016 · 49 · 129210.1021/acs.accounts.6b00194 ↗
15. Jin · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 1097510.1039/D2NR07147A ↗
16. McDonald · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 483810.1038/s41467-023-40459-8 ↗
17. Sanders · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2023 · 145 · 968610.1021/jacs.3c01092 ↗
18. Xu · Chem. Sci. · 2023 · 14 · 1020310.1039/D3SC03174H ↗
19. Kiessling · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 447610.1039/c3cs60097a ↗
20. Nagao · Chem. – Asian J. · 2023 · 18 · e20230064310.1002/asia.202300643 ↗
21. Nagao · Biomacromolecules · 2017 · 18 · 438510.1021/acs.biomac.7b01426 ↗
22. Kondo · Chem. Commun. · 2020 · 56 · 125910.1039/C9CC08526B ↗
23. Shanmugam · Macromolecules · 2016 · 49 · 934510.1021/acs.macromol.6b02060 ↗
24. Phommalysack-Lovan · Chem. Commun. · 2018 · 54 · 659110.1039/C8CC02783H ↗
25. Dawson · J. Appl. Toxicol. · 2005 · 25 · 3010.1002/jat.1015 ↗