Protein encapsulation within the internal cavity of a bacterioferritin
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermal and chemical stability of 24mer ferritins has led to attempts to exploit their naturally occurring nanoscale (8 nm) internal cavities for biotechnological applications. An area of increasing interest is the encapsulation of molecules either for medical or biocatalysis applications. Encapsulation requires ferritin dissociation, typically induced using high temperature or acidic conditions (pH ≥ 2), which generally precludes the inclusion of fragile cargo such as proteins or peptide fragments. Here we demonstrate that minimizing salt concentration combined with adjusting the pH to ≤8.5 (i.e. low proton/metal ion concentration) reversibly shifts the naturally occurring equilibrium between dimeric and 24meric assemblies of Escherichia coli bacterioferritin (Bfr) in favour of the disassembled form. Interconversion between the different oligomeric forms of Bfr is sufficiently slow under these conditions to allow the use of size exclusion chromatography to obtain wild type protein in the purely dimeric and 24meric forms. This control over association state was exploited to bind heme at natural sites that are not accessible in the assembled protein. The potential for biotechnological applications was demonstrated by the encapsulation of a small, acidic [3Fe-4S] cluster-containing ferredoxin within the Bfr internal cavity. The capture of ∼4-6 negatively charged ferredoxin molecules per cage indicates that charge complementarity with the inner protein surface is not an essential determinant of successful encapsulation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron Metabolism and Disorders · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, School of Chemistry, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Bioimaging Facility, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Comellas-Aragones · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 63510.1038/nnano.2007.299 ↗
2. Chakraborti · RSC Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 1329310.1039/C9RA10983H ↗
3. Lohner · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 2383510.1002/anie.202110327 ↗
4. Bhaskar · NPG Asia Mater. · 2017 · 9 · e37110.1038/am.2016.128 ↗
5. Bialasek · J. Physiol. Pharmacol. · 2019 · 70 · 675
6. Li · Pharmacol. Res. · 2016 · 110 · 110.1016/j.phrs.2016.05.006 ↗
7. Monti · Nanomedicine · 2019 · 20 · 10199710.1016/j.nano.2019.04.001 ↗
8. Wagner · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2016 · 105 · 7710.1016/j.addr.2016.05.004 ↗
9. Lee · Nanomedicine · 2006 · 2 · 13710.1016/j.nano.2006.07.009 ↗
10. Matsumoto · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 86710.1021/nn3053457 ↗
11. Choudhary · PLoS One · 2012 · 7 · e3334210.1371/journal.pone.0033342 ↗
12. Worsdorfer · Science · 2011 · 331 · 58910.1126/science.1199081 ↗
13. Tamura · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2015 · 112 · 1310.1002/bit.25322 ↗
14. He · New Biotechnol. · 2015 · 32 · 65110.1016/j.nbt.2014.12.006 ↗
15. Tetter · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2017 · 56 · 1493310.1002/anie.201708530 ↗
16. Hestericova · Dalton Trans. · 2018 · 47 · 1083710.1039/C8DT02224K ↗
17. Chakraborti · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 391810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01148 ↗
18. Andrews · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2010 · 1800 · 69110.1016/j.bbagen.2010.05.010 ↗
19. Bradley · JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. · 2014 · 19 · 77510.1007/s00775-014-1136-3 ↗
20. Theil · Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. · 2011 · 15 · 30410.1016/j.cbpa.2011.01.004 ↗
21. Chiou · Pharmaceuticals · 2018 · 11 · 12410.3390/ph11040124 ↗
22. Yang · Chem. Commun. · 2007 · 345310.1039/b705326f ↗
23. Zhang · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 21910.1021/nl903313r ↗
24. Stefanini · Biochemistry · 1987 · 26 · 183110.1021/bi00381a007 ↗
25. Gerl · Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. · 1987 · 15 · 10310.1007/BF00257503 ↗
26. Sato · Biochemistry · 2016 · 55 · 28710.1021/acs.biochem.5b01152 ↗
27. Sato · Biochemistry · 2016 · 55 · 48210.1021/acs.biochem.5b01197 ↗
28. Kim · Biomacromolecules · 2011 · 12 · 162910.1021/bm200026v ↗
29. Huard · Nat. Chem. Biol. · 2013 · 9 · 16910.1038/nchembio.1163 ↗
30. Pulsipher · Isr. J. Chem. · 2016 · 56 · 66010.1002/ijch.201600017 ↗
31. Ceci · Extremophiles · 2011 · 15 · 43110.1007/s00792-011-0374-3 ↗
32. Pulsipher · Protein Sci. · 2018 · 27 · 175510.1002/pro.3483 ↗
33. Le Brun · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2010 · 1800 · 73210.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.002 ↗
34. Andrews · Eur. J. Biochem. · 1993 · 213 · 32910.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17766.x ↗
35. Kilic · Protein Sci. · 2003 · 12 · 166310.1110/ps.0301903 ↗
36. Ardejani · Biochemistry · 2011 · 50 · 402910.1021/bi200207w ↗
37. Bradley · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 1476310.1002/anie.201507486 ↗
38. Bauminger · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1991 · 1118 · 4810.1016/0167-4838(91)90440-B ↗
39. Yang · Biochemistry · 2000 · 39 · 491510.1021/bi992631f ↗
40. Child · Chem. Sci. · 2018 · 9 · 794810.1039/C8SC01286E ↗
41. Cheesman · Nature · 1990 · 346 · 77110.1038/346771a0 ↗
42. Wong · Biochem. J. · 2012 · 444 · 55310.1042/BJ20112200 ↗
43. Malone · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 49610.1021/ja036483z ↗
44. Lawson · Biochemistry · 2009 · 48 · 903110.1021/bi900869x ↗
45. Jiang · Theranostics · 2019 · 9 · 216710.7150/thno.30867 ↗
46. Zhang · J. Biol. Chem. · 2010 · 285 · 1207810.1074/jbc.M109.092445 ↗
47. Zhang · J. Biochem. · 2015 · 158 · 505
48. Mohanty · Biomacromolecules · 2021 · 22 · 138910.1021/acs.biomac.0c01562 ↗
49. Wang · J. Biotechnol. · 2017 · 254 · 3410.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.05.025 ↗
50. Pulsipher · Biochemistry · 2017 · 56 · 359610.1021/acs.biochem.7b00296 ↗
51. Kumar · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1193210.1039/D1NR01632F ↗
52. Bulos · Biochemistry · 2021 · 60 · 359610.1021/acs.biochem.1c00515 ↗