In silico prediction of the in vitro behavior of polymeric gene delivery vectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Non-viral gene delivery vectors have increasingly come under the spotlight, but their performaces are still far from being satisfactory. Therefore, there is an urgent need for forecasting tools and screening methods to enable the development of ever more effective transfectants. Here, coarse-grained (CG) models of gold standard transfectant poly(ethylene imine)s (PEIs) have been profitably used to investigate and highlight the effect of experimentally-relevant parameters, namely molecular weight (2 vs. 10 kDa) and topologies (linear vs. branched), protonation state, and ammine-to-phosphate ratios (N/Ps), on the complexation and the gene silencing efficiency of siRNA molecules. The results from the in vitro screening of cationic polymers and conditions were used to validate the in silico platform that we developed, such that the hits which came out of the CG models were of high practical relevance. We show that our in silico platform enables to foresee the most suitable conditions for the complexation of relevant siRNA-polycation assemblies, thereby providing a reliable predictive tool to test bench transfectants in silico, and foster the design and development of gene delivery vectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Virus-based gene therapy research · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
GenT LΛB
Department of Chemistry
Materials and Chemical Engineering “G. Natta”
20131 Milan
Italy
Biomolecular Engineering Lab
Department of Electronics
Information and Bioengineering
Funding
Fondazione Cariplo · Politecnico di Milano
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Lostalé-Seijo · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2018 · 2 · 25810.1038/s41570-018-0039-1 ↗
2. Wirth · Gene · 2013 · 525 · 16210.1016/j.gene.2013.03.137 ↗
3. Jackson · N. Engl. J. Med. · 2020 · 383 · 192010.1056/NEJMoa2022483 ↗
4. Walsh · N. Engl. J. Med. · 2020 · 383 · 243910.1056/NEJMoa2027906 ↗
5. Baldi · Biotechnol. Lett. · 2007 · 29 · 67710.1007/s10529-006-9297-y ↗
6. Reineke · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2019 · 30 · 26110.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00096 ↗
7. Felgner · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1987 · 84 · 741310.1073/pnas.84.21.7413 ↗
8. Malone · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1989 · 86 · 607710.1073/pnas.86.16.6077 ↗
9. Kose · Sci. Immunol. · 2019 · 4 · eaaw664710.1126/sciimmunol.aaw6647 ↗
10. Ponti · Chem. Phys. Lipids · 2021 · 235 · 10503210.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.105032 ↗
11. Godbey · J. Controlled Release · 2001 · 72 · 11510.1016/S0168-3659(01)00267-X ↗
12. Rui · Trends Biotechnol. · 2019 · 37 · 28110.1016/j.tibtech.2018.08.010 ↗
13. Pezzoli · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 110.1007/s11051-013-1523-7 ↗
14. Breunig · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 1445410.1073/pnas.0703882104 ↗
15. Godbey · J. Controlled Release · 1999 · 60 · 14910.1016/S0168-3659(99)00090-5 ↗
16. Malloggi · Polym. Chem. · 2015 · 6 · 632510.1039/C5PY00915D ↗
17. Sun · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 240510.1021/jp211716v ↗
18. Lee · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 38910.1038/nnano.2012.73 ↗
19. Pezzoli · Nat. Publ. Gr. · 2017 · 1
20. Hill · Trends Biotechnol. · 2016 · 34 · 9110.1016/j.tibtech.2015.11.004 ↗
21. Park · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2006 · 58 · 46710.1016/j.addr.2006.03.007 ↗
22. Bono · Pharmaceutics · 2020 · 12 · 18310.3390/pharmaceutics12020183 ↗
23. Kim · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 691710.1021/jp402868g ↗
24. Ziebarth · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 622510.1021/jp908327q ↗
25. Nademi · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 103210.1039/C9NR08128C ↗
26. Meneksedag-Erol · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 2839910.1021/acsami.8b09914 ↗
27. Sun · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 28 · 39910.1080/01694243.2012.693830 ↗
28. Meneksedag-Erol · Biomaterials · 2018 · 156 · 10710.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.037 ↗
29. Meneksedag-Erol · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 547510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b00415 ↗
30. Merzel · Phys. Rev. E · 2007 · 76 · 03191710.1103/PhysRevE.76.031917 ↗
31. Sponer · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 417710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00427 ↗
32. Shi · J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 141 · 10510210.1063/1.4894752 ↗
33. Knotts · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 08490110.1063/1.2431804 ↗
34. Kikot · Biophysics · 2011 · 56 · 38710.1134/S0006350911030109 ↗
35. Wang · Mol. Simul. · 2018 · 44 · 100410.1080/08927022.2018.1469753 ↗
36. Mahajan · J. Comput. Chem. · 2019 · 40 · 60710.1002/jcc.25747 ↗
37. Ziebarth · Biomacromolecules · 2010 · 11 · 2910.1021/bm900842d ↗
38. Meneksedag-Erol · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 547510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b00415 ↗
39. Ziebarth · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2017 · 121 · 194110.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10775 ↗
40. Beu · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 714 · 9410.1016/j.cplett.2018.10.071 ↗
41. Beu · J. Comput. Chem. · 2019 · jcc.26110
42. Mahajan · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2019 · 123 · 962910.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07031 ↗
43. Whitehead · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2009 · 8 · 12910.1038/nrd2742 ↗
44. Macke · ACS Symp. Ser. · 1998 · 682 · 37910.1021/bk-1998-0682.ch024 ↗
45. Uusitalo · Biophys. J. · 2017 · 113 · 24610.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.043 ↗
46. Melone · ChemPlusChem · 2015 · 80 · 140810.1002/cplu.201500145 ↗
47. Yesylevskyy · PLoS Comput. Biol. · 2010 · 6 · 110.1371/journal.pcbi.1000810 ↗
48. Van der Spoel · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 170110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
49. Rigoldi · Proteins · 2016 · 84 · 74410.1002/prot.25015 ↗
50. Rigoldi · J. Biol. Chem. · 2017 · 292 · jbc.M116.77027110.1074/jbc.M116.770271 ↗
51. Gautieri · J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. · 2010 · 7 · 110.1166/jctn.2010.1482 ↗
52. Gautieri · Int. J. Mater. Res. (formerly Z. Metallkd.) · 2009 · 100 · 92110.3139/146.110132 ↗
53. Bussi · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 01410110.1063/1.2408420 ↗
54. Berendsen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 368410.1063/1.448118 ↗
55. Marrink · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 781210.1021/jp071097f ↗
56. Humphrey · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
57. Godbey · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1999 · 45 · 26810.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990605)45:3<268::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
58. Pack · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2005 · 4 · 58110.1038/nrd1775 ↗
59. Lucotti · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 4962010.1039/C4RA08845J ↗
60. Bolcato-Bellemin · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 1605010.1073/pnas.0707831104 ↗
61. Perez · Int. J. Pharm. · 2009 · 380 · 18910.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.06.035 ↗
62. Breunig · J. Controlled Release · 2008 · 130 · 5710.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.016 ↗
63. Breunig · J. Controlled Release · 2014 · 4 · 1
64. Pezzoli · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 152310.1007/s11051-013-1523-7 ↗
65. Pezzoli · Nat. Publ. Gr. · 2017 · 1
66. Forest · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2017 · 70 · 88910.1016/j.msec.2016.09.016 ↗
67. Chatterjee · Commun. Biol. · 2020 · 3 · 110.1038/s42003-020-01470-7 ↗
68. Cao · Science · 2020 · 370 · 42610.1126/science.abd9909 ↗
69. Rigoldi · APL Bioeng. · 2018 · 2 · 01150110.1063/1.4997367 ↗
70. Wang · Biochemistry · 2019 · 58 · 145110.1021/acs.biochem.8b00896 ↗