Unraveling the role of substrate materials in governing the carbon/carbide growth of molten carbonate electrolysis of CO 2
Source abstract
Abstract
The interface interaction between deposited carbon and metallic electrode substrates in tuning the growth of CO2-derived products (e.g., amorphous carbon, graphite, carbide) is mostly unexplored for the high-temperature molten-salt electrolysis of CO2. Herein, the carbon deposition on different transition-metal cathodes was performed to reveal the role of substrate materials in the growth of cathodic products. At the initial stage of electrolysis, transition metals (e.g., Cr, Fe, Ni, and Co) that exhibit appropriate carbon-binding ability (in range of -30 to 60 kJ mol-1) allow carbon diffusing into and then dissociating from metal to form graphite, as the carbon-binding ability can be determined by the Gibbs free energy of formation of metallic carbides. The catalytic cathodes showing super strong (e.g., Ti, V, Mo, and W) or weak (e.g., Cu) carbon-binding ability produce stable carbides or amorphous carbon, respectively. However, the subsequent deposited carbon is immune to the catalysis of the substrate, forming amorphous carbon nanoparticles and nanofibers on the surface of carbides and graphite, respectively. This paper not only highlights the role of the catalytic cathodes for carbon deposition, but also offers a material selection principle for the controllable growth of CO2-derived products in molten salts.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Resource and Environmental Science, Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Sustainable Resources and Energy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Sanz-cobena · Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. · 2017 · 238 · 510.1016/j.agee.2016.09.038 ↗
2. Angamuthu · Science · 2010 · 327 · 31310.1126/science.1177981 ↗
3. Abdul · J. Cleaner Prod. · 2017 · 167 · 110.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.163 ↗
4. Jessop · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 34410.1021/ja953097b ↗
5. Abdul · Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. · 2017 · 71 · 11210.1016/j.rser.2017.01.011 ↗
6. He · Fuel Process. Technol. · 2023 · 240 · 10756310.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107563 ↗
7. Gulati · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2023 · 474 · 21485310.1016/j.ccr.2022.214853 ↗
8. Chen · Green Chem. · 2019 · 21 · 254410.1039/C9GC00827F ↗
9. Yin · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 153810.1039/c3ee24132g ↗
10. Deng · Appl. Energy · 2019 · 255 · 11386210.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113862 ↗
11. Deng · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 50 · 1058810.1021/acs.est.6b02955 ↗
12. Deng · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 259 · 97510.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.025 ↗
13. Deng · Faraday Discuss. · 2016 · 190 · 24110.1039/C5FD00234F ↗
14. Ge · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · D24810.1149/2.0091706jes ↗
15. Douglas · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 6 · M308410.1149/2.0131706jss ↗
16. Kaplan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · 15910.1149/2.016211jes ↗
17. Lv · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 200224110.1002/aenm.202002241 ↗
18. Yu · Carbon · 2021 · 184 · 42610.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.033 ↗
19. Yu · Nano Lett. · 2022 · 22 · 9710.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03284 ↗
20. Liu · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 110.1038/s41467-020-20314-w ↗
21. Siambun · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · H111710.1149/2.017111jes ↗
22. Tang · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 114 · 56710.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.109 ↗
23. Song · Thin Solid Films · 2012 · 520 · 685610.1016/j.tsf.2012.07.056 ↗
24. Ren · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 614210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02427 ↗
25. Douglas · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1901010.1021/acsami.8b02834 ↗
26. Hu · ChemSusChem · 2016 · 9 · 58810.1002/cssc.201501591 ↗
27. Ge · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 347 · 40110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.119 ↗
28. Song · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 101 · 380810.1111/jace.15535 ↗
29. Li · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 04250110.1149/1945-7111/ab7176 ↗
30. Eom · Energy · 2022 · 245 · 12316210.1016/j.energy.2022.123162 ↗
31. Weisweiler · Carbon · 1971 · 9 · 75510.1016/0008-6223(71)90008-X ↗
32. Ōya · Carbon · 1979 · 17 · 13110.1016/0008-6223(79)90020-4 ↗
33. Li · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 12 · 426810.1021/nl902515k ↗
34. Shimodaira · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 90210.1063/1.1487434 ↗
35. Ferrari · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 187401 · 1
36. Sinclair · Microsc. Microanal. · 2002 · 8 · 28810.1017/S1431927602020226 ↗
37. Ōya · J. Mater. Sci. · 1982 · 17 · 30910.1007/BF00591464 ↗
38. Ishlda · J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 1991 · 12 · 41710.1007/BF02645959 ↗
39. H. D.Лякишев , Handbook of Metal Binary Phase Diagram , Russia , 2000
40. Deck · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 26710.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.023 ↗
41. Tu · Carbon · 2014 · 4 · 5
42. Rist · Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. · 1991 · 341 · 36010.1007/BF00321937 ↗