Challenges of grazing emission X-ray fluorescence (GEXRF) for the characterization of advanced nanostructured surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The grazing emission X-ray fluorescence (GEXRF) technique offers a promising approach to determining the spatial distribution of various chemical elements in nanostructures. In this paper, we present a comparison with grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS), an established method for dimensional nanometrology, on periodic TiO2 nanostructures fabricated by a self-aligned double patterning (SADP) process. We further test the potential of GEXRF for process control in the presence of residual chromium on the structures. The angle-resolved fluorescence emission as well as the scattered radiation from the surface are collected with photon-counting hybrid pixel area detectors using scanning-free detection schemes. By modelling the X-ray standing wave (XSW) field in the vicinity of and inside the nanostructure, it is possible to obtain both the angle-resolved fluorescence intensities and the far-field scattering intensities from the same model. The comparison also illustrates that for ensemble photon-based measurement methods, accounting for roughness effects and imperfections can be essential when modelling advanced nanostructured surfaces.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestraße 2–12, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 07745 Jena, Germany
Kurchatov Institute, Kurchatov Sq 1, 123182 Moscow, Russia
Funding
Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Orji · Nat. Electron. · 2018 · 1 · 53210.1038/s41928-018-0150-9 ↗
2. Villarrubia · Ultramicroscopy · 2015 · 154 · 1510.1016/j.ultramic.2015.01.004 ↗
3. Erni · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 09610110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096101 ↗
4. Häßler-Grohne · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 22 · 09400310.1088/0957-0233/22/9/094003 ↗
5. Dai · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 31 · 07401110.1088/1361-6501/ab7fd2 ↗
6. Bunday · Proc. SPIE · 2016 · 9778 · 136
7. Soltwisch · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2017 · 50 · 152410.1107/S1600576717012742 ↗
8. Suh · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2016 · 49 · 82310.1107/S1600576716004453 ↗
9. Levine · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 1989 · 22 · 52810.1107/S002188988900717X ↗
10. Renaud · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2009 · 64 · 25510.1016/j.surfrep.2009.07.002 ↗
11. Pflüger · IUCrJ · 2017 · 4 · 43110.1107/S2052252517006297 ↗
12. de Boer · X-Ray Spectrom. · 1995 · 24 · 9110.1002/xrs.1300240304 ↗
13. Becker · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1983 · 50 · 15310.1103/PhysRevLett.50.153 ↗
14. Kayser · Spectrochim. Acta, Part B · 2014 · 88 · 13610.1016/j.sab.2013.06.011 ↗
15. Kayser · J. Anal. At. Spectrom. · 2015 · 30 · 108610.1039/C4JA00461B ↗
16. Szwedowski-Rammert · J. Anal. At. Spectrom. · 2019 · 34 · 92210.1039/C8JA00427G ↗
17. Hönicke · Small · 2021 · 2105776
18. Fernández Herrero · Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 3249010.1364/OE.27.032490 ↗
19. Baumann · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2021 · 258 · 200047110.1002/pssb.202000471 ↗
20. Kayser · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 12310210.1063/1.4838575 ↗
21. Wernecke · J. Synchrotron Radiat. · 2014 · 21 · 52910.1107/S160057751400294X ↗
22. Skroblin · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2020 · 91 · 02310210.1063/1.5128487 ↗
23. Krumrey · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2001 · 467–468 · 117510.1016/S0168-9002(01)00598-8 ↗
24. Fuchs · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1995 · 66 · 224810.1063/1.1145720 ↗
25. Shinoda · J. Surf. Anal. · 2009 · 15 · 29510.1384/jsa.15.295 ↗
26. Kayser · Anal. Chem. · 2015 · 87 · 1081510.1021/acs.analchem.5b03346 ↗
27. Elam · Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2002 · 63 · 12110.1016/S0969-806X(01)00227-4 ↗
28. T.Siefke and S.Kroker , in Polarization Control by Deep Ultra Violet Wire Grid Polarizers , Springer International Publishing , Cham , 2018 , pp. 359–374
29. Siefke · Opt. Lett. · 2014 · 39 · 643410.1364/OL.39.006434 ↗
30. Siefke · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 178010.1002/adom.201600250 ↗
31. Andrle · Nanomaterials · 2021 · 11 · 164710.3390/nano11071647 ↗
32. Pomplun · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2007 · 244 · 341910.1002/pssb.200743192 ↗
33. Mikulík · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1999 · 59 · 763210.1103/PhysRevB.59.7632 ↗
34. Kato · Appl. Opt. · 2010 · 49 · 610210.1364/AO.49.006102 ↗
35. Henn · Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 522910.1364/OL.37.005229 ↗
36. Schneider · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 272610.1021/acsphotonics.9b00706 ↗
37. Virtanen · Nat. Methods · 2020 · 17 · 26110.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
38. Soltwisch · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 617710.1039/C8NR00328A ↗
39. R.Klockenkämper and A.von Bohlen , Total-Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods , John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , Hoboken, New Jersey , 2015
40. Storn · J. Glob. Optim. · 1997 · 11 · 34110.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
41. Pflüger · J. Micro/Nanolithogr., MEMS, MOEMS · 2020 · 19 · 110.1117/1.JMM.19.1.014001 ↗
42. Sunday · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2015 · 48 · 135510.1107/S1600576715013369 ↗
43. Siefke · Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 1953410.1364/OE.26.019534 ↗