Effect of confinement on water rotation via quantum tunnelling
Source abstract
Abstract
O molecules and the H-bond network of water clusters, but whether this effect is important in confined space remains elusive. Here, we studied the quantum tunnelling effect of water dimers in carbon nanotubes with different sizes by first-principles calculations. Our results show that though this effect may be negligible at room temperature, it becomes dominant at low temperatures up to ∼100 Kelvin. In particular, with the injection of a small amount of energy to excite a specific vibrational mode, the tunnelling rotation effect can be significantly enhanced, which provides a new strategy to tune the H-bond network of confined water.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics
Jilin University
Changchun 130012
China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy (Jilin University)
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shanghai 201800
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh · Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 65 · 67810.1209/epl/i2003-10160-9 ↗
2. Bernardina · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1043710.1021/jacs.6b02635 ↗
3. Reiter · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 03680310.1103/PhysRevLett.111.036803 ↗
4. Rasaiah · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2008 · 59 · 71310.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093815 ↗
5. Agrawal · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 26710.1038/nnano.2016.254 ↗
6. Majumder · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 4410.1038/438044a ↗
7. Nguyen · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 154910.1021/jz300443a ↗
8. Albert · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 52 · 34610.1002/anie.201205990 ↗
9. Prager · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 293310.1021/cr9500848 ↗
10. Laage · Science · 2006 · 311 · 83210.1126/science.1122154 ↗
11. Joseph · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.064502 ↗
12. Bakker · Science · 2002 · 297 · 58710.1126/science.1073298 ↗
13. Geissler · Science · 2001 · 291 · 212110.1126/science.1056991 ↗
14. Mann · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 410.1103/PhysRevLett.90.195503 ↗
15. Richardson · Science · 2016 · 351 · 131010.1126/science.aae0012 ↗
16. Pugliano · Science · 1992 · 257 · 193710.1126/science.1411509 ↗
17. Gorshunov · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 201510.1021/jz400782j ↗
18. Kolesnikov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 610.1103/PhysRevLett.116.167802 ↗
19. Kurotobi · Science · 2011 · 333 · 61310.1126/science.1206376 ↗
20. Zhang · Nat. Chem. · 2016 · 8 · 43510.1038/nchem.2464 ↗
21. Hummer · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 18810.1038/35102535 ↗
22. Hanasaki · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 17471410.1063/1.2194540 ↗
23. Feyereisen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 299310.1021/jp952860l ↗
24. Mukhopadhyay · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 633 · 1310.1016/j.cplett.2015.04.016 ↗
25. Kollman · J. Chem. Phys. · 1969 · 51 · 328610.1063/1.1672509 ↗
26. Kim · J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 97 · 664910.1063/1.463669 ↗
27. Grimme · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
28. Ceriotti · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2013 · 110 · 1559110.1073/pnas.1308560110 ↗