journal article·2018

Effect of confinement on water rotation via quantum tunnelling

Depeng Zhang, Zhiyuan Zhang, Wanrun Jiang, Yi Gao, Zhigang Wang

Nanoscale· Volume 10· Issue 39
Publisher page

Abstract

O molecules and the H-bond network of water clusters, but whether this effect is important in confined space remains elusive. Here, we studied the quantum tunnelling effect of water dimers in carbon nanotubes with different sizes by first-principles calculations. Our results show that though this effect may be negligible at room temperature, it becomes dominant at low temperatures up to ∼100 Kelvin. In particular, with the injection of a small amount of energy to excite a specific vibrational mode, the tunnelling rotation effect can be significantly enhanced, which provides a new strategy to tune the H-bond network of confined water.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics

Jilin University

Changchun 130012

China

Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy (Jilin University)

Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Shanghai 201800

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh · Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 65 · 67810.1209/epl/i2003-10160-9 ↗
2. Bernardina · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1043710.1021/jacs.6b02635 ↗
3. Reiter · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 03680310.1103/PhysRevLett.111.036803 ↗
4. Rasaiah · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2008 · 59 · 71310.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093815 ↗
5. Agrawal · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 26710.1038/nnano.2016.254 ↗
6. Majumder · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 4410.1038/438044a ↗
7. Nguyen · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 154910.1021/jz300443a ↗
8. Albert · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 52 · 34610.1002/anie.201205990 ↗
9. Prager · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 293310.1021/cr9500848 ↗
10. Laage · Science · 2006 · 311 · 83210.1126/science.1122154 ↗
11. Joseph · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.064502 ↗
12. Bakker · Science · 2002 · 297 · 58710.1126/science.1073298 ↗
13. Geissler · Science · 2001 · 291 · 212110.1126/science.1056991 ↗
14. Mann · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 410.1103/PhysRevLett.90.195503 ↗
15. Richardson · Science · 2016 · 351 · 131010.1126/science.aae0012 ↗
16. Pugliano · Science · 1992 · 257 · 193710.1126/science.1411509 ↗
17. Gorshunov · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 201510.1021/jz400782j ↗
18. Kolesnikov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 610.1103/PhysRevLett.116.167802 ↗
19. Kurotobi · Science · 2011 · 333 · 61310.1126/science.1206376 ↗
20. Zhang · Nat. Chem. · 2016 · 8 · 43510.1038/nchem.2464 ↗
21. Hummer · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 18810.1038/35102535 ↗
22. Hanasaki · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 17471410.1063/1.2194540 ↗
23. Feyereisen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 299310.1021/jp952860l ↗
24. Mukhopadhyay · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 633 · 1310.1016/j.cplett.2015.04.016 ↗
25. Kollman · J. Chem. Phys. · 1969 · 51 · 328610.1063/1.1672509 ↗
26. Kim · J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 97 · 664910.1063/1.463669 ↗
27. Grimme · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
28. Ceriotti · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2013 · 110 · 1559110.1073/pnas.1308560110 ↗