journal article·2021Open access

Richness of molecular junction configurations revealed by tracking a full pull-push cycle

Tamar Yelin, Sudipto Chakrabarti, Ayelet Vilan, Oren Tal

Nanoscale· Volume 13· Issue 44

Abstract

In the field of molecular electronics, the interplay between molecular orientation and the resulting electronic transport is of central interest. At the single molecule level, this topic is extensively studied with the aid of break junction setups. In such experiments, two metal electrodes are brought into contact, and the conductance is typically measured when the electrodes are pulled apart in the presence of molecules, until a molecule bridges the two electrodes. However, the molecular junctions formed in this pull process reflect only part of the rich possible junction configurations. Here, we show that the push process, in which molecular junctions are formed by bringing the electrodes towards each other, allows the fabrication of molecular junction structures that are not necessarily formed in the pull process. We also find that in the extreme case, molecular junctions can be formed only in the push process that is typically ignored. Our findings demonstrate that tracking the two inverse processes of molecular junction formation, reveals a more comprehensive picture of the variety of molecular configurations in molecular junctions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical and Biological Physics Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel

Funding

Israel Science Foundation · Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel · Minerva Foundation · H2020 European Research Council

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Slowinski · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 1191010.1021/ja971921l ↗
2. Yamamoto · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 746910.1021/jp014612x ↗
3. Camarasa-Gómez · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 638110.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01956 ↗
4. Rakhmilevitch · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 174110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04674 ↗
5. Yelin · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 195610.1021/nl304702z ↗
6. Kim · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 373410.1021/nl201777m ↗
7. Kim · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 19680410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196804 ↗
8. Quek · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 23010.1038/nnano.2009.10 ↗
9. Kim · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 79410.1021/nl404143v ↗
10. Diez-Perez · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 22610.1038/nnano.2011.20 ↗
11. Walkey · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3688610.1021/acsami.9b11044 ↗
12. van der Molen · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 133001
13. Yelin · Nat. Mater. · 2016 · 15 · 44410.1038/nmat4552 ↗
14. Magyarkuti · J. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 146 · 09231910.1063/1.4975180 ↗
15. Liu · Chem · 2019 · 5 · 39010.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.002 ↗
16. Pabi · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2021 · 104 · L12140710.1103/PhysRevB.104.L121407 ↗
17. Muller · Phys. C · 1992 · 191 · 48510.1016/0921-4534(92)90947-B ↗
18. Pal · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 110.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 ↗
19. Pauly · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2011 · 84 · 19542010.1103/PhysRevB.84.195420 ↗
20. Limot · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 12610210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.126102 ↗
21. Dürig · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1990 · 65 · 34910.1103/PhysRevLett.65.349 ↗
22. Untiedt · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 20680110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206801 ↗
23. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 24542210.1103/PhysRevB.84.245422 ↗
24. Dednam · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2015 · 574 · 012045
25. Pal · Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 9 · 147110.3762/bjnano.9.138 ↗
26. Ormaza · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 110.1038/s41467-017-02151-6 ↗
27. Garnier · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 819310.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03271 ↗