Electrochemical impacts complement light scattering techniques for in situ nanoparticle sizing
Source abstract
Abstract
We show that the electrochemical particle-impact technique (or 'nano-impacts') complements light scattering techniques for sizing both mono- and poly-disperse nanoparticles. It is found that established techniques - Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) - can accurately measure the diameters of '30 nm' silver particles assuming spherical shapes, but are unable to accurately size a smaller '20 nm' sample. In contrast, nano-impacts have a high accuracy (<5% error in effective diameters) and are able to size both individual '20 nm' and '30 nm' silver NPs in terms of the number of constituent atoms. Further study of a '20 nm and 30 nm' bimodal sample shows that the electrochemical technique resolves the two very similar sizes well, demonstrating accurate sizing regardless of particle size polydispersity, whereas due to inherent limitations of light scattering measurements this is not possible for DLS and NTA. Electrochemical sizing is concluded to offer significant attractions over light scattering methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Oxford University
UK
Funding
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Kelly · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 66810.1021/jp026731y ↗
2. Zhou · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 132 · 13810.1021/ja904307n ↗
3. Kim · J. Appl. Toxicol. · 2013 · 33 · 7810.1002/jat.2792 ↗
4. Laborda · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2016 · 904 · 1010.1016/j.aca.2015.11.008 ↗
5. Gaumet · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2008 · 69 · 110.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.001 ↗
6. Brar · TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 30 · 410.1016/j.trac.2010.08.008 ↗
7. Filipe · Pharm. Res. · 2010 · 27 · 79610.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 ↗
8. Meli · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 23 · 12500510.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125005 ↗
9. Eaton · Ultramicroscopy · 2017 · 182 · 17910.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.001 ↗
10. Ahamed · Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. · 2010 · 242 · 26310.1016/j.taap.2009.10.016 ↗
11. Cumberland · J. Chromatogr., A · 2009 · 1216 · 909910.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.021 ↗
12. Singhal · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2011 · 13 · 298110.1007/s11051-010-0193-y ↗
13. Langevin · NanoImpact · 2018 · 10 · 9710.1016/j.impact.2017.12.004 ↗
14. Moosmüller · J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. · 2009 · 59 · 102810.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028 ↗
15. Little · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1594310.1039/C8NR06062B ↗
16. Zhou · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 123 · 430510.1002/ange.201100885 ↗
17. Cheng · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 125 · 1321810.1002/ange.201307653 ↗
18. Zhou · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 126 · 1279510.1002/ange.201405992 ↗
19. Sokolov · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 2810.1039/C6CP07788A ↗
20. Stevenson · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2017 · 6 · 3810.1016/j.coelec.2017.07.009 ↗
21. Albrecht · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2017 · 7 · 13810.1016/j.coelec.2017.11.016 ↗
22. Little · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1353710.1039/C8CP01561A ↗
23. Wan · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2013 · 394 · 26310.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.037 ↗
24. Lees · ChemPhysChem · 2013 · 14 · 389510.1002/cphc.201300796 ↗
25. Batchelor-McAuley · Analyst · 2015 · 140 · 504810.1039/C5AN00474H ↗
26. Kätelhön · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 199 · 29710.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.031 ↗
27. LeBel · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 1962 · 7 · 10010.1021/je60012a032 ↗
28. Dionzou · Soft Matter · 2016 · 12 · 216610.1039/C5SM01863C ↗
29. Ngamchuea · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 1608510.1002/chem.201703591 ↗
30. Little · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2018 · 823 · 49210.1016/j.jelechem.2018.06.050 ↗
31. Bartlett · ChemistryOpen · 2015 · 4 · 60010.1002/open.201500061 ↗
32. Haddou · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1361210.1039/c2cp42585h ↗
33. Stuart · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 687910.1039/c2ra20628e ↗
34. Zhou · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1435410.1039/c2cp42940c ↗
35. Suherman · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 2830010.1039/C8CP05154B ↗
36. Qiu · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 50570710.1088/0957-4484/24/50/505707 ↗
37. Bartlett · ChemElectroChem · 2015 · 2 · 52210.1002/celc.201402401 ↗
38. Arenas-Guerrero · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 950210.1038/s41598-018-27840-0 ↗
39. Tomaszewska · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 2013 · 6010.1155/2013/313081 ↗