journal article·2019

Electrochemical impacts complement light scattering techniques for in situ nanoparticle sizing

Ruochen Xie, Christopher Batchelor-McAuley, Neil P. Young, Richard G. Compton

Nanoscale· Volume 11· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

We show that the electrochemical particle-impact technique (or 'nano-impacts') complements light scattering techniques for sizing both mono- and poly-disperse nanoparticles. It is found that established techniques - Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) - can accurately measure the diameters of '30 nm' silver particles assuming spherical shapes, but are unable to accurately size a smaller '20 nm' sample. In contrast, nano-impacts have a high accuracy (<5% error in effective diameters) and are able to size both individual '20 nm' and '30 nm' silver NPs in terms of the number of constituent atoms. Further study of a '20 nm and 30 nm' bimodal sample shows that the electrochemical technique resolves the two very similar sizes well, demonstrating accurate sizing regardless of particle size polydispersity, whereas due to inherent limitations of light scattering measurements this is not possible for DLS and NTA. Electrochemical sizing is concluded to offer significant attractions over light scattering methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

Oxford University

UK

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Kelly · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 66810.1021/jp026731y ↗
2. Zhou · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 132 · 13810.1021/ja904307n ↗
3. Kim · J. Appl. Toxicol. · 2013 · 33 · 7810.1002/jat.2792 ↗
4. Laborda · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2016 · 904 · 1010.1016/j.aca.2015.11.008 ↗
5. Gaumet · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2008 · 69 · 110.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.001 ↗
6. Brar · TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 30 · 410.1016/j.trac.2010.08.008 ↗
7. Filipe · Pharm. Res. · 2010 · 27 · 79610.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 ↗
8. Meli · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 23 · 12500510.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125005 ↗
9. Eaton · Ultramicroscopy · 2017 · 182 · 17910.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.001 ↗
10. Ahamed · Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. · 2010 · 242 · 26310.1016/j.taap.2009.10.016 ↗
11. Cumberland · J. Chromatogr., A · 2009 · 1216 · 909910.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.021 ↗
12. Singhal · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2011 · 13 · 298110.1007/s11051-010-0193-y ↗
13. Langevin · NanoImpact · 2018 · 10 · 9710.1016/j.impact.2017.12.004 ↗
14. Moosmüller · J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. · 2009 · 59 · 102810.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1028 ↗
15. Little · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1594310.1039/C8NR06062B ↗
16. Zhou · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 123 · 430510.1002/ange.201100885 ↗
17. Cheng · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 125 · 1321810.1002/ange.201307653 ↗
18. Zhou · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 126 · 1279510.1002/ange.201405992 ↗
19. Sokolov · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 2810.1039/C6CP07788A ↗
20. Stevenson · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2017 · 6 · 3810.1016/j.coelec.2017.07.009 ↗
21. Albrecht · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2017 · 7 · 13810.1016/j.coelec.2017.11.016 ↗
22. Little · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1353710.1039/C8CP01561A ↗
23. Wan · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2013 · 394 · 26310.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.037 ↗
24. Lees · ChemPhysChem · 2013 · 14 · 389510.1002/cphc.201300796 ↗
25. Batchelor-McAuley · Analyst · 2015 · 140 · 504810.1039/C5AN00474H ↗
26. Kätelhön · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 199 · 29710.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.031 ↗
27. LeBel · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 1962 · 7 · 10010.1021/je60012a032 ↗
28. Dionzou · Soft Matter · 2016 · 12 · 216610.1039/C5SM01863C ↗
29. Ngamchuea · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 1608510.1002/chem.201703591 ↗
30. Little · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2018 · 823 · 49210.1016/j.jelechem.2018.06.050 ↗
31. Bartlett · ChemistryOpen · 2015 · 4 · 60010.1002/open.201500061 ↗
32. Haddou · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1361210.1039/c2cp42585h ↗
33. Stuart · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 687910.1039/c2ra20628e ↗
34. Zhou · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1435410.1039/c2cp42940c ↗
35. Suherman · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 2830010.1039/C8CP05154B ↗
36. Qiu · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 50570710.1088/0957-4484/24/50/505707 ↗
37. Bartlett · ChemElectroChem · 2015 · 2 · 52210.1002/celc.201402401 ↗
38. Arenas-Guerrero · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 950210.1038/s41598-018-27840-0 ↗
39. Tomaszewska · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 2013 · 6010.1155/2013/313081 ↗