journal article·2020Open access

Stable and high yield growth of GaP and In 0.2 Ga 0.8 As nanowire arrays using In as a catalyst

Andrea Scaccabarozzi, Andrea Cattoni, Gilles Patriarche, Laurent Travers, Stéphane Collin, Jean-Christophe Harmand, Frank Glas, Fabrice Oehler

Nanoscale· Volume 12· Issue 35

Abstract

We report the first investigation of indium (In) as the vapor-liquid-solid catalyst of GaP and InGaAs nanowires by molecular beam epitaxy. A strong asymmetry in the Ga distribution between the liquid and solid phases allows one to obtain pure GaP and In0.2Ga0.8As nanowires while the liquid catalyst remains nearly pure In. This uncommon In catalyst presents several advantages. First, the nanowire morphology can be tuned by changing the In flux alone, independently of the Ga and group V fluxes. Second, the nanowire crystal structure always remains cubic during steady state growth and catalyst crystallization, despite the low contact angle of the liquid droplet measured after growth (95°). Third, the vertical yield of In-catalyzed GaP and (InGa)As nanowire arrays on patterned silicon substrates increases dramatically. Combining straight sidewalls, controllable morphologies and a high vertical yield, In-catalysts provide an alternative to the standard Au or Ga alloys for the bottom-up growth of large scale homogeneous arrays of (InGa)As or GaP nanowires.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Université Paris-Saclay

CNRS

Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies

Palaiseau

France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 17010.1038/nphoton.2010.315 ↗
2. Scofield · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 224210.1021/nl200355d ↗
3. Wallentin · Science · 2013 · 339 · 105710.1126/science.1230969 ↗
4. Noborisaka · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 21310210.1063/1.1935038 ↗
5. Tomioka · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 163910.1021/nl9041774 ↗
6. Mariani · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 249010.1021/nl200965j ↗
7. Borgström · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 54110.1038/nnano.2007.263 ↗
8. Aberg · IEEE J. Photovoltaics · 2016 · 6 · 18510.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2484967 ↗
9. Wagner · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1964 · 4 · 8910.1063/1.1753975 ↗
10. Wu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 517710.1063/1.1532772 ↗
11. Boulanger · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 27 · 03500210.1088/0268-1242/27/3/035002 ↗
12. Plissard · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 27560210.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275602 ↗
13. Munshi · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 96010.1021/nl404376m ↗
14. Dimakis · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 260410.1021/nl500428v ↗
15. Oehler · Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 70110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03695 ↗
16. Colombo · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 15532610.1103/PhysRevB.77.155326 ↗
17. Dastjerdi · Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 47540310.1088/0957-4484/27/47/475403 ↗
18. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 03311710.1063/1.3678185 ↗
19. Jacobsson · Nature · 2016 · 531 · 31710.1038/nature17148 ↗
20. Dick · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 320010.1021/nl301185x ↗
21. Priante · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 191710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05121 ↗
22. So · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 13570410.1088/1361-6528/aa6051 ↗
23. Zhang · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 1058010.1021/acsnano.5b03682 ↗
24. Heiß · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 07560310.1088/0957-4484/20/7/075603 ↗
25. Jabeen · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2011 · 17 · 79410.1109/JSTQE.2010.2068279 ↗
26. Johansson · J. Cryst. Growth · 2019 · 509 · 11810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.01.002 ↗
27. Grecenkov · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2016 · 16 · 452610.1021/acs.cgd.6b00645 ↗
28. Grap · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 33560110.1088/0957-4484/24/33/335601 ↗
29. Dimakis · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2011 · 11 · 400110.1021/cg200568m ↗
30. Hertenberger · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 04311610.1063/1.4738769 ↗
31. Koblmüller · Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2013 · 8 · 1110.1002/pssr.201308207 ↗
32. Hertenberger · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 12311410.1063/1.3567496 ↗
33. Priante · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 603610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02224 ↗
34. Glas · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2013 · 88 · 19530410.1103/PhysRevB.88.195304 ↗
35. Dubrovskii · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 45300110.1088/1361-6463/aa87a7 ↗
36. Glas · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 13550110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.135501 ↗
37. Glas · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2017 · 17 · 478510.1021/acs.cgd.7b00732 ↗
38. Panish · Prog. Solid State Chem. · 1972 · 7 · 3910.1016/0079-6786(72)90004-0 ↗
39. Ramdani · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2012 · 13 · 9110.1021/cg301167g ↗
40. Anderson · J. Phase Equilib. · 1991 · 12 · 6410.1007/BF02663677 ↗
41. Panciera · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 166910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04808 ↗
42. Glas · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 14610110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.146101 ↗
43. Dubrovskii · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2017 · 17 · 254410.1021/acs.cgd.7b00076 ↗
44. Harmand · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 16610110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.166101 ↗
45. Russo-Averchi · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 286910.1021/nl504437v ↗
46. Matteini · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2016 · 16 · 578110.1021/acs.cgd.6b00858 ↗
47. Vukajlovic-Plestina · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 86910.1038/s41467-019-08807-9 ↗