The core composition of DNA block copolymer micelles dictates DNA hybridization properties, nuclease stabilities, and cellular uptake efficiencies
Source abstract
Abstract
Here, we report how the nature of the hydrophobic core affects the molecular interactions of DNA block copolymer assemblies. Three different amphiphilic DNA block copolymers, DNA-b-polystyrene (DNA-b-PS), DNA-b-poly(2-vinylpyridine) (DNA-b-P2VP), and DNA-b-poly(methyl acrylate) (DNA-b-PMA) were synthesized and assembled into spherical micelles composed of a hydrophobic polymer core and DNA corona. Interestingly, DNA block copolymer micelles having different hydrophobic cores exhibited markedly different molecular and biological interactions. DNA-b-PS exhibited higher melting temperature, sharper melting transition, higher stability to nuclease-catalyzed DNA degradation, and higher cellular uptake efficiency compared to DNA-b-P2VP and DNA-b-PMA. The investigation of the self-assembly behavior revealed a much higher aggregation number and DNA density for DNA-b-PS micelles, which explains the superior properties of DNA-b-PS. These results demonstrate that the type of the hydrophobic core polymer, which has been largely overlooked, has a profound impact on the molecular and biological interactions of the DNA shell.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Nanoscience, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
College of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Education
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Cutler · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 137610.1021/ja209351u ↗
2. Albert · Small · 2019 · 15 · 190050410.1002/smll.201900504 ↗
3. Prigodich · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1063810.1021/ja104859j ↗
4. Chen · Small · 2010 · 6 · 225610.1002/smll.201001185 ↗
5. Rush · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 137910.1021/nn305030g ↗
6. Alemdaroglu · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 89910.1002/adma.200700866 ↗
7. Li · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 105510.1021/nl049628o ↗
8. Zhang · Small · 2015 · 11 · 536010.1002/smll.201501573 ↗
9. Luo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1015710.1021/jacs.6b04076 ↗
10. Watson · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 559210.1021/ja0156845 ↗
11. Kamps · Macromolecules · 2014 · 47 · 372010.1021/ma500509u ↗
12. Kim · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1494110.1021/jacs.6b07985 ↗
13. Kim · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 250110.1039/C8NR09341E ↗
14. Jia · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 784310.1039/C5CC01934F ↗
15. Kim · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 227610.1021/acsnano.9b09312 ↗
16. George · Macromolecules · 2015 · 48 · 891310.1021/acs.macromol.5b01853 ↗
17. Topel · J. Mol. Liq. · 2013 · 177 · 4010.1016/j.molliq.2012.10.013 ↗
18. Dutschk · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2003 · 267 · 45610.1016/S0021-9797(03)00723-9 ↗
19. Astafieva · Macromolecules · 1993 · 26 · 733910.1021/ma00078a034 ↗
20. Magenau · Macromolecules · 2015 · 48 · 723010.1021/acs.macromol.5b01758 ↗
21. Cutler · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 925410.1021/ja203375n ↗
22. Jin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 164310.1021/ja021096v ↗
23. Pan · Biochemistry · 1997 · 36 · 662410.1021/bi962960x ↗
24. Seferos · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 9 · 30810.1021/nl802958f ↗
25. Prigodich · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 212010.1021/ja110833r ↗
26. Choi · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2013 · 110 · 762510.1073/pnas.1305804110 ↗
27. Banga · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 986610.1021/ja504845f ↗
28. Tumolo · Anal. Biochem. · 2004 · 333 · 27310.1016/j.ab.2004.06.010 ↗