Bayesian network as a support tool for rapid query of the environmental multimedia distribution of nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
An approach is presented describing the development of a Bayesian network (BN) based tool for rapid assessment of the distribution of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). The methodology was demonstrated via the construction of a BN model for estimating the exposure concentrations of nanomaterials (BN-nanoExpo) based on simulation data derived from a mechanistic multimedia compartmental fate and transport model. The results of simulations of the distribution of six ENMs in eight different regions were generated for a broad range of geographical and meteorological parameters as well as ENM release rates to the air, water and soil major compartments. Test cases with the constructed BN-nanoExpo demonstrated the capability of the BN based model to portray a wide range of simulation results that can be obtained with the mechanistic fate and transport model. Moreover, BN-nanoExpo is shown to be a suitable tool for estimating both ENM concentrations and release rates given partial information, while also enabling assessment of the impact of uncertainties in input data on the predicted outcomes. The results of the current study suggest that there is merit in exploring the utility of the approach to more complex models, which would provide decision makers with powerful tools for rapid assessment of the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Gajewicz · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2012 · 64 · 166310.1016/j.addr.2012.05.014 ↗
2. NIOSH , General Safe Practices for Working with Engineered Nanomaterials in Research Laboratories, 2012
3. Keller · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 169210.1007/s11051-013-1692-4 ↗
4. Liu · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 328110.1021/es405132z ↗
5. Meesters · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 572610.1021/es500548h ↗
6. Praetorius · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 670510.1021/es204530n ↗
7. Sun · Environ. Pollut. · 2014 · 185 · 6910.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.004 ↗
8. Mackay · Pract. Period. Hazard., Toxic, Radioact. Waste Manage. · 2002 · 6 · 6310.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2002)6:2(63) ↗
9. Mueller · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 444710.1021/es7029637 ↗
10. Money · Sci. Total Environ. · 2014 · 473–474 · 68510.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.100 ↗
11. Money · Sci. Total Environ. · 2012 · 426 · 43610.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.064 ↗
12. Pollino · Environ. Model. Softw. · 2007 · 22 · 114010.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.006 ↗
13. Bhanja · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2006 · 5 · 65710.1109/TNANO.2006.883474 ↗
14. Voie · Sci. Total Environ. · 2010 · 408 · 183310.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.002 ↗
15. Barton · Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. · 2012 · 8 · 41810.1002/ieam.1327 ↗
16. Uusitalo · Ecol. Modell. · 2007 · 203 · 31210.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 ↗
17. Aguilera · Environ. Model. Softw. · 2011 · 26 · 137610.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 ↗
18. Dlamini · Environ. Model. Softw. · 2010 · 25 · 19910.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.002 ↗
19. N. Fenton and M.Neil, Risk assessment and decision analysis with Bayesian networks, 2013, 503pp
20. L. A. Kapustka and W. G.Landis, Environmental Risk Assessment and Management from a Landscape Perspective, 201010.1002/9780470593028 ↗
21. F. V. Jensen and T. D.Nielsen, Bayesian Network and Decision Graph, 200710.1007/978-0-387-68282-2 ↗
22. L. Wasserman , All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference Brief Contents. Simulation, 2004, vol. C, p. 46110.1007/978-0-387-21736-9 ↗
23. Xhemali · Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, IJCSI · 2009 · 4 · 16
24. Pham · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2009 · 465 · 292710.1098/rspa.2009.0065 ↗
25. Tetko · J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. · 1995 · 35 · 82610.1021/ci00027a006 ↗
26. Liu · Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 6 · 93810.3762/bjnano.6.97 ↗
27. Liu · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 4570810.1088/0957-4484/26/4/045708 ↗
28. Kaweeteerawat · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 49 · 110510.1021/es504259s ↗
29. L. Torgo , R. P.Ribeiro, B.Pfahringer and P.Branco, SMOTE for regression, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2013, vol. 8154, pp. 378–389
30. Glahn · J. Appl. Meteorol. · 1981 · 20 · 8810.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<0088:COCOIM>2.0.CO;2 ↗
31. R. Pears , J.Finlay and A.Connor
32. De Campos · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 663
33. Neapolitan · Mol. Biol. · 2003 · 6 · 674
34. Jaakkola · AISTATS · 2010 · 9 · 358
35. Giorgi · J. Geophys. Res. · 1986 · 91 · 979410.1029/JD091iD09p09794 ↗
36. Meesters · Environ. Sci.: Nano · 2016 · 3 · 715
37. Dempster · J. R. Stat. Soc., Series B · 1977 · 39 · 110.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
38. Jonathan · Stat. Comput. · 2000 · 10 · 20910.1023/A:1008987426876 ↗
39. Zhang · Ann. Stat. · 1993 · 21 · 29910.1214/aos/1176349027 ↗
40. Corp NS, Netica Application: A complete software package to solve problems using Bayesian Belief networks and influence diagrams, 2016 [accessed 2016 Jan 1]. https://www.norsys.com/netica.html
41. J. H. Seinfeld and S. N.Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1998