journal article·2015

The aspect ratio effect of drug nanocrystals on cellular internalization efficiency, uptake mechanisms, and in vitro and in vivo anticancer efficiencies

Baishun Tian, Xiujuan Zhang, Caitong Yu, Mengjiao Zhou, Xiaohong Zhang

Nanoscale· Volume 7· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the aspect ratio (AR) effect of anticancer drug nanocrystals (NCs) on their cellular internalization efficiency, uptake mechanisms, biodistributions as well as in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficiencies. Both confocal imaging and flow cytometry show that shorter NCs with AR = 1.3 have a much faster cellular uptake rate and a much higher anticancer efficacy than longer NCs. All NCs with different ARs were found to enter the cells via an energy-dependent clathrin-mediated pathway. In vivo experiments indicate that NCs with higher ARs have a shorter half-life and are more easily captured by the liver, while the corresponding tumor uptake decreased. We also observed that NCs with the smallest AR have the highest therapeutic efficacy with appreciably less weight loss. These results would assist in the future design of drug NCs and may lead to the development of new drug nanostructures for biomedical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Functional Nano & Soft Materials Laboratory (FUNSOM) and Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices

Soochow University

Suzhou, China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Sailor · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 377910.1002/adma.201200653 ↗
2. Zhang · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 169610.1021/nn800275r ↗
3. Wang · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 332210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.060 ↗
4. Jiang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 229510.1002/adfm.201303222 ↗
5. Majzoub · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 499610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.007 ↗
6. Yuba · Biomaterials · 2013 · 12 · 304210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.031 ↗
7. Baba · Mol. Pharm. · 2007 · 4 · 28910.1021/mp060117f ↗
8. Agarwal · J. Controlled Release · 2008 · 128 · 25510.1016/j.jconrel.2008.03.017 ↗
9. Liu · J. Pharm. Sci. · 2010 · 99 · 354210.1002/jps.22112 ↗
10. Li · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 812010.1039/c2cc33214k ↗
11. Zhou · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 896010.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.080 ↗
12. Matsumura · Cancer Res. · 1986 · 46 · 6387
13. Merisko-Liversidge · Pharm. Res. · 1996 · 13 · 27210.1023/A:1016051316815 ↗
14. J-UA · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2008 · 3 · 295
15. Li · Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 1098910.1039/c3cc46718j ↗
16. Gratton · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 1161310.1073/pnas.0801763105 ↗
17. Chithran · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 66210.1021/nl052396o ↗
18. Zhang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 912110.1002/anie.200902929 ↗
19. Knop · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 628810.1002/anie.200902672 ↗
20. Chauhan · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 1141710.1002/anie.201104449 ↗
21. Horváth · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 380010.1021/nn200139h ↗
22. Matsumura · Cancer Res. · 1986 · 46 · 6387
23. Maeda · J. Controlled Release · 2000 · 65 · 27110.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5 ↗
24. Liu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 766810.1002/anie.200902612 ↗
25. Zhang · Cancer Lett. · 2010 · 298 · 2610.1016/j.canlet.2010.05.023 ↗
26. Littell · J. Anim. Sci. · 1998 · 76 · 121610.2527/1998.7641216x ↗
27. Yang · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 780310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.006 ↗