Transport of nanoprobes in multicellular spheroids
Source abstract
Abstract
The efficient delivery of drugs to cells depends on their diffusion through the extracellular matrix (ECM) of tissues. Here we present a study on the diffusion of nanoprobes of radius from 1 nm to over 100 nm in the ECM of spheroids of three cell types (HeLa, MCF-7 and fibroblasts). We quantified the nanoparticle transport in the spheroids' proliferating zone. We determined the size-dependent viscosity of the ECM. We revealed that nanoobjects up to 10 nm in radius exhibited unobstructed diffusion in the ECM, regardless of the spheroid type. The presented length-scale dependent viscosity profiles for spheroids pave the way for advanced modelling of drug administration through tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Soft Condensed Matter
Institute of Physical Chemistry
Polish Academy of Sciences
Warsaw
Poland
Genomic Medicine
Medical University
Laboratory of Experimental Medicine
Funding
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Minchinton · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2006 · 6 · 58310.1038/nrc1893 ↗
2. Jang · Pharm. Res. · 2003 · 20 · 133710.1023/A:1025785505977 ↗
3. Jain · Cancer Res. · 1987 · 47 · 3039
4. Rahman · Cancer Res. · 1986 · 46 · 2295
5. Rahman · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2007 · 2 · 567
6. Miele · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2009 · 4 · 9910.1504/IJNM.2009.028116 ↗
7. Chang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2012 · 7 · 49
8. Netti · Cancer Res. · 2000 · 60 · 2497
9. Hynes · Science · 2009 · 326 · 121610.1126/science.1176009 ↗
10. Kalwarczyk · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 215710.1021/nl2008218 ↗
11. Kalwarczyk · Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2015 · 223 · 5510.1016/j.cis.2015.06.007 ↗
12. Mueller-Klieser · J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. · 1987 · 113 · 10110.1007/BF00391431 ↗
13. Nunes · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2019 · 116 · 20610.1002/bit.26845 ↗
14. Nederman · Cancer Res. · 1984 · 44 · 3090
15. Olsen · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 13 · 18810.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.024 ↗
16. Polonchuk · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 700510.1038/s41598-017-06385-8 ↗
17. Machán · FEBS Lett. · 2014 · 588 · 357110.1016/j.febslet.2014.03.056 ↗
18. Kalwarczyk · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2017 · 121 · 983110.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07158 ↗
19. Wullkopf · Mol. Biol. Cell · 2018 · 29 · 237810.1091/mbc.E18-05-0319 ↗
20. Baker · Br. J. Cancer · 1999 · 79 · 134710.1038/sj.bjc.6690217 ↗
21. Theocharis · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2016 · 97 · 410.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001 ↗
22. Gale · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 68 · 212410.1016/S0006-3495(95)80393-0 ↗
23. Van De Sande · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1985 · 89 · 40410.1021/j100249a007 ↗
24. Gale · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 68 · 212410.1016/S0006-3495(95)80393-0 ↗
25. Biela · Cytometry, Part A · 2013 · 83 · 53310.1002/cyto.a.22264 ↗
26. Lin · Biotechnol. J. · 2008 · 3 · 117210.1002/biot.200700228 ↗
27. Smyrek · Biol. Open · 2019 · 8 · bio03705110.1242/bio.037051 ↗
28. Zhang · Oncotarget · 2018 · 9 · 548010.18632/oncotarget.23869 ↗
29. Tchoryk · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2019 · 30 · 137110.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00136 ↗
30. Cutrona · Small · 2019 · 15 · 190203310.1002/smll.201902033 ↗
31. Kim · Nat. Methods · 2007 · 4 · 96310.1038/nmeth1104 ↗
32. Pluen · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2001 · 98 · 462810.1073/pnas.081626898 ↗
33. De Los Santos · Mol. Reprod. Dev. · 2015 · 82 · 58710.1002/mrd.22501 ↗
34. Kihara · PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e8238210.1371/journal.pone.0082382 ↗
35. Einstein · Ann. Phys. · 1905 · 17 · 54910.1002/andp.19053220806 ↗
36. Sutherland · Philos. Mag. J. Sci. · 1905 · 9 · 78110.1080/14786440509463331 ↗
37. Fukuda · PLoS One · 2017 · 12 · e018565410.1371/journal.pone.0185654 ↗
38. Holle · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2015 · 97 · 27010.1016/j.addr.2015.10.007 ↗
39. Raavé · J. Controlled Release · 2018 · 274 · 110.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.029 ↗