journal article·2019

Imaging dopant distribution across complete phase transformation by TEM and upconversion emission

Daniel Avram, Claudiu Colbea, Mihaela Florea, Sorin Lazar, Daniel Stroppa, Carmen Tiseanu

Nanoscale· Volume 11· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

Correlating dopant distribution to its optical response represents a complex challenge for nanomaterials science. Differentiating the "true" clustering nature from dopant pairs formed in statistical distribution complicates even more the elucidation of doping-functionality relationship. The present study associates lanthanide dopant distribution, including all significant events (enrichment, depletion and surface segregation), to its optical response in upconversion (UPC) at the ensemble and single-nanoparticle level. A small deviation from the Er nominal concentration of a few percent is able to induce clear differences in Er UPC emission color, intensity, excited-state dynamics and ultimately, UPC mechanisms, across tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation in rationally designed Er doped ZrO2 nanoparticles. Rare evidence of a heterogeneous dopant distribution leading to the coexistence of two polymorphs in a single nanoparticle is revealed by Z- and phase contrast transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Despite their spatial proximity, Er in the two polymorphs are spectroscopically isolated, i.e. they do not communicate by energy transfer. Segregated Er, which is well imaged in TEM, is absent in UPC, while the minor phase content overlooked by X-ray diffraction and TEM is revealed by UPC. The outstanding sensitivity of combined TEM and UPC emission to subtle deviations from uniform doping in the diluted concentration regime renders such an approach relevant for various functional oxides supporting lanthanide dopants as emitters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute for Laser

Plasma and Radiation Physics

Bucharest-Magurele

Romania

National Institute of Materials Physics

077125 Magurele-Ilfov

Thermo Fisher Scientific

5651 GG Eindhoven

The Netherlands

Funding

Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii · Ministerul Educaţiei şi Cercetării Ştiinţifice

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. Chan · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 575310.1002/adma.201500248 ↗
2. Han · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 1170210.1002/anie.201403408 ↗
3. Wen · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 241510.1038/s41467-018-04813-5 ↗
4. Fischer · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 724110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03683 ↗
5. Wilhelm · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 1064410.1021/acsnano.7b07120 ↗
6. Dong · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1595010.1021/jp206441u ↗
7. Li · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 363410.1021/nl501366x ↗
8. Gargas · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 30010.1038/nnano.2014.29 ↗
9. Xu · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 771910.1039/C7NR01456B ↗
10. Pilch · Small · 2017 · 13 · 170163510.1002/smll.201701635 ↗
11. Hudry · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 190062310.1002/adma.201900623 ↗
12. Hudry · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 923810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03118 ↗
13. Xu · Adv. Sci. · 2018 · 5 · 180076610.1002/advs.201800766 ↗
14. Ma · Small · 2019 · 180496910.1002/smll.201804969 ↗
15. Xiang · Small · 2019 · 15 · 180533910.1002/smll.201805339 ↗
16. Chevalier · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 92 · 190110.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x ↗
17. Kim · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 468410.1002/adfm.201101058 ↗
18. Guo · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 51 · 15110.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.07.001 ↗
19. Feng · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1107910.1038/ncomms11079 ↗
20. Kelly · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2002 · 47 · 46310.1016/S0079-6425(00)00005-0 ↗
21. Guan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 801010.1021/jacs.5b04528 ↗
22. Abel · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 18510.1021/jz101593g ↗
23. Bian · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 362310.1021/acsnano.8b00741 ↗
24. Lazic · Ultramicroscopy · 2016 · 160 · 26510.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.011 ↗
25. Chen · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 462110.1039/c3nr00368j ↗
26. Xiong · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 10655510.1039/C6RA24486F ↗
27. Liu · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 79 · 7510.1016/j.matlet.2012.03.112 ↗
28. Alifanti · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 39510.1021/cm021274j ↗
29. Korf · Appl. Catal. · 1990 · 58 · 13110.1016/S0166-9834(00)82283-6 ↗
30. Wang · Chem. Commun. · 1999 · 10310.1039/a808708c ↗
31. Howie · J. Microsc. · 1979 · 117 · 1110.1111/j.1365-2818.1979.tb00228.x ↗
32. Mizoguchi · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 505810.1021/nn400605z ↗
33. Weibel · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 237810.1021/cm0403762 ↗
34. Li · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 11810.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06964.x ↗
35. Howard · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. · 1988 · 44 · 11610.1107/S0108768187010279 ↗
36. Huang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 452310.1021/ja048121c ↗
37. Nitsche · Nanostruct. Mater. · 1996 · 7 · 53510.1016/0965-9773(96)00027-X ↗
38. Mitsuhashi · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1974 · 57 · 9710.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10823.x ↗
39. Lee · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 790910.1021/ja3125349 ↗
40. Lee · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 387210.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.027 ↗
41. Dou · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1323610.1021/la201910t ↗
42. Lee · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 96510.1002/adfm.201101996 ↗
43. Gunawan · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 555310.1021/nl2034688 ↗
44. Auzel · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 13910.1021/cr020357g ↗
45. Zhao · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 94410.1039/C2NR32482B ↗
46. Dong · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 656910.1021/jacs.5b01718 ↗
47. Dong · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 656910.1021/jacs.5b01718 ↗
48. Gonell · Nanoscale Adv. · 2019 · 1 · 253710.1039/C8NA00412A ↗
49. Tanner · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 509010.1039/c3cs60033e ↗
50. Tiseanu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 70310.1039/C3CP52893F ↗
51. Chen · J. Alloys Compd. · 2004 · 381 · 26610.1016/j.jallcom.2004.03.102 ↗
52. Tiseanu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1297010.1039/c2cp41946g ↗
53. Podhorodecki · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 42910.1039/C2NR32212A ↗
54. Nadort · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1309910.1039/C5NR08477F ↗
55. Yan · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1794910.1039/C8NR04816A ↗
56. Soares · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 2013810.1039/C5RA00189G ↗
57. Bergstrand · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 495910.1039/C8NR10332A ↗
58. May · Methods Appl. Fluoresc. · 2019 · 7 · 02300110.1088/2050-6120/ab02c6 ↗
59. Wurth · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 492210.1021/jacs.8b01458 ↗
60. Sun · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1714110.1039/C8CP02142B ↗
61. Ofelt · J. Chem. Phys. · 1962 · 37 · 51110.1063/1.1701366 ↗
62. Judd · Phys. Rev. · 1962 · 127 · 75010.1103/PhysRev.127.750 ↗
63. Teufer · Acta Crystallogr. · 1962 · 15 · 118710.1107/S0365110X62003114 ↗
64. Förster · Naturwissenschaften · 1946 · 33 · 16610.1007/BF00585226 ↗
65. Tissue · Chem. Mater. · 1998 · 10 · 283710.1021/cm9802245 ↗
66. Agazzi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 675910.1021/jp4011839 ↗
67. Lupei · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2001 · 64 · 09210210.1103/PhysRevB.64.092102 ↗
68. Noculak · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 1378410.1039/C5NR03385C ↗
69. Denzler · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 284110.1063/1.368425 ↗
70. Chen · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 05410810.1103/PhysRevB.94.054108 ↗
71. De la Rosa-Cruz · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 490310.1063/1.1632020 ↗
72. Liu · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 2084310.1021/jp063145m ↗
73. Florea · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1804310.1039/C8NR03695K ↗
74. An · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 115610.1021/jz4002423 ↗
75. Feng · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 216210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00506 ↗
76. Zhu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 1153210.1021/jacs.5b07734 ↗
77. Ogale · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 312510.1002/adma.200903891 ↗
78. Obregon · J. Catal. · 2013 · 299 · 29810.1016/j.jcat.2012.12.021 ↗
79. Kong · Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 187310.1364/OL.34.001873 ↗
80. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1511910.1021/jp0686689 ↗