Bifunctional PGM-free metal organic framework-based electrocatalysts for alkaline electrolyzers: trends in the activity with different metal centers
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to solely rely on renewable and efficient energy sources, reliable energy storage and production systems are required. Hydrogen is considered an ideal solution as it can be produced electrochemically by water electrolysis and renewably while no pollutants are released when consumed. The most common catalysts in electrolyzers are composed of rare and expensive precious group metals. Replacing these materials with Earth-abundant materials is important to make these devices economically viable. Metal organic frameworks are one possible solution. Herein we demonstrate the synthesis and characterization studies of metal benzene-tri-carboxylic acid-based metal-organic frameworks embedded in activated carbon. The conductive composite material was found to be electrocatalytically active for both the oxygen evolution reaction and the hydrogen evolution reaction. Furthermore, several metal organic frameworks sharing the same ligand but with different first-row transition metals (M = Co, Cu, Fe, Mn) were compared, and the trend of their activity is discussed. Cobalt was found to have the highest activity among the studied metal centers, and therefore has the best potential to serve as a bifunctional catalyst for alkaline electrolyzers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Bar Ilan Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials (BINA)
Bar Ilan University
Ramat-Gan 52900
Israel
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Haifa 3200003
Department of Chemical Engineering
Funding
Ministry of Energy, Israel · Nancy and Stephen Grand Technion Energy Program
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Dincer · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2015 · 40 · 1109410.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035 ↗
2. Shi · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2016 · 4 · 600610.1039/C6TA01900E ↗
3. Gallandat · J. Power Energy Eng. · 2017 · 5 · 3410.4236/jpee.2017.510003 ↗
4. Walter · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 644610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
5. Wang · Adv. Sci. · 2017 · 4 · 160037110.1002/advs.201600371 ↗
6. Caban-Acevedo · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 124510.1038/nmat4410 ↗
7. Zeng · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1494210.1039/C5TA02974K ↗
8. Gong · Nano Res. · 2014 · 8 · 2310.1007/s12274-014-0591-z ↗
9. Fabbri · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 380010.1039/C4CY00669K ↗
10. Moschkowitsch · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 487910.1021/acscatal.0c00105 ↗
11. Dionigi · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 6 · 160062110.1002/aenm.201600621 ↗
12. Liu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 3447410.1021/acsami.6b12803 ↗
13. Duan · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1534110.1038/ncomms15341 ↗
14. Das · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 3502510.1021/acsami.8b09941 ↗
15. Wu · Nano Energy · 2018 · 44 · 35310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.045 ↗
16. He · Angew. Chem. · 2018 · 130 · 474710.1002/ange.201801122 ↗
17. Gonen · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2018 · 9 · 17910.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.035 ↗
18. Gonen · Data Brief · 2018 · 19 · 28110.1016/j.dib.2018.05.011 ↗
19. Wang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 1617910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.120 ↗
20. Shi · Mater. Horiz. · 2019 · 6 · 68410.1039/C8MH01397G ↗
21. Fleker · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 493510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00528 ↗
22. Gonen · ChemCatChem · 2019 · 11 · 612410.1002/cctc.201901604 ↗
23. Chui · Science · 1999 · 283 · 114810.1126/science.283.5405.1148 ↗
24. Song · Chin. J. Catal. · 2014 · 35 · 18510.1016/S1872-2067(12)60729-3 ↗
25. Gonen · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 963410.1039/C7NR09081A ↗
26. Hohenberg · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
27. Kohn · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
28. Cococcioni · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2005 · 71 · 03510510.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105 ↗
29. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
30. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
31. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
32. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
33. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
34. Shi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 1489210.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03096 ↗
35. Crane · J. Chem. Educ. · 2015 · 92 · 37310.1021/ed5000839 ↗
36. Yaghi · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 909610.1021/ja960746q ↗
37. Tan · J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., Mater. Sci. Ed. · 2015 · 30 · 7110.1007/s11595-015-1103-z ↗
38. Levy · Carbon · 2020 · 158 · 23810.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.012 ↗
39. J. Chastain , Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , Perkin-Elmer Corporation , 1992 , vol. 40 , p. 221
40. Cabrera-German · Surf. Interface Anal. · 2016 · 48 · 25210.1002/sia.5933 ↗
41. Zhao · ChemCatChem · 2019 · 11 · 342310.1002/cctc.201900846 ↗
42. Subbaraman · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 55010.1038/nmat3313 ↗
43. Lim · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1192010.1039/C5TA02063H ↗
44. Liu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2019 · 58 · 467910.1002/anie.201901409 ↗