Structural stability and uniformity of magnetic Pt 13 nanoparticles in NaY zeolite
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on first-principles calculations, the structural stability and magnetic variety of Pt13 nanoparticles encapsulated in a NaY zeolite are investigated. Among 50 stable isomers in the gas phase, due to geometrical constraints, only about 1/3 of those clusters can be inserted in the zeolite pores. Severe structural rearrangements occur depending on whether the solid angle at the Pt vertex bound to the super-cage is larger than 2 sr (i.e., icosahedron). The most relevant example is the structural instability of the icosahedron and, when including van der Waals dispersion forces the opening of the gas phase global minimum moves towards a new L-shaped cubic wire, otherwise unstable. The total magnetisation of the encapsulated Pt13 decreases due to the stabilisation of less coordinated isomers, with the majority of clusters characterised by a total magnetisation of 2μB, while the majority of free clusters exhibit a threefold value. This analysis allows the understanding of the magnetic behaviour observed in recent experiments through the variety of the isomers which can be accommodated in the zeolite pore.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics
King's College London
London
UK
Nano-bio Spectroscopy Group and ETSF Universidad del Pais Vasco
CFM CSIC-UPV/EHU
E-20018 Donostia-San Sebastian
Spain
IKERBASQUE
Funding
Ekonomiaren Garapen eta Lehiakortasun Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritza · Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación · European Cooperation in Science and Technology · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 376710.1021/cr9003902 ↗
2. Barnard · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2010 · 73 · 08650210.1088/0034-4885/73/8/086502 ↗
3. Sánchez-Sánchez · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 562210.1021/ja100922h ↗
4. Medel · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1006210.1073/pnas.1100129108 ↗
5. Di Paola · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 288510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00916 ↗
6. Guo · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 287810.1002/adma.200800627 ↗
7. Chen · Nano Today · 2009 · 4 · 8110.1016/j.nantod.2008.09.002 ↗
8. Zečević · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 369810.1021/nn400707p ↗
9. Koenigsmann · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 978310.1021/ja111130t ↗
10. Sakamoto · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 83 · 10442010.1103/PhysRevB.83.104420 ↗
11. Parsina · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 116010.1039/C1NR11171J ↗
12. Di Paola · Eur. Phys. J. D · 2013 · 67 · 4910.1140/epjd/e2013-30561-4 ↗
13. Smogunov · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 2210.1038/nnano.2007.419 ↗
14. Maitra · ChemPhysChem · 2011 · 12 · 232210.1002/cphc.201100121 ↗
15. Liu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 25340110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.253401 ↗
16. Liu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 049902 (E)10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.049902 ↗
17. Bartolomé · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 80 · 01440410.1103/PhysRevB.80.014404 ↗
18. Batlle · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07B52410.1063/1.3559504 ↗
19. Roduner · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 431810.1002/anie.201310637 ↗
20. Akdogan · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 10 · 295210.1039/b718932j ↗
21. Bunau · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 196006
22. Yadnum · ChemPhysChem · 2013 · 14 · 92310.1002/cphc.201200997 ↗
23. Huertas-Miranda · Mol. Simul. · 2013 · 39 · 17610.1080/08927022.2012.711907 ↗
24. Boekfa · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 1299010.1021/la901841w ↗
25. Liu · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 201310.1021/jp0561874 ↗
26. Hu · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 79 · 19541610.1103/PhysRevB.79.195416 ↗
27. Wang · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 75 · 23540510.1103/PhysRevB.75.235405 ↗
28. Piotrowski · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 81 · 15544610.1103/PhysRevB.81.155446 ↗
29. Castleman · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 266410.1021/jp806850h ↗
30. Reveles · Nat. Chem. · 2009 · 1 · 31010.1038/nchem.249 ↗
31. Roduner · Magnetochemistry · 2015 · 1 · 2810.3390/magnetochemistry1010028 ↗
32. Reber · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2017 · 50 · 25510.1021/acs.accounts.6b00464 ↗
33. Laio · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 1256210.1073/pnas.202427399 ↗
34. Tribello · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 135 · 11410910.1063/1.3628676 ↗
35. Pavan · Eur. Phys. J. D · 2013 · 67 · 2410.1140/epjd/e2012-30560-y ↗
36. Baletto · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 385610.1063/1.1448484 ↗
37. Giannozzi · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 395502
38. Blonski · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 136001
39. Barone · J. Comput. Chem. · 2009 · 30 · 93410.1002/jcc.21112 ↗
40. Bell · Zeolites · 1992 · 12 · 87010.1016/0144-2449(92)90065-W ↗
41. R. E. Fletcher , S.Ling and B.Slater, 2016
42. Bonatsos · Phys. Rev. A · 2000 · 62 · 01320310.1103/PhysRevA.62.013203 ↗
43. Momma · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2011 · 44 · 127210.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗