journal article·2019Open access

Multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) and super-resolution fluorescence imaging with a supramolecular biopolymer for the controlled tagging of polysaccharides

Haobo Ge, Fernando Cortezon-Tamarit, Hui-Chen Wang, Adam C. Sedgwick, Rory L. Arrowsmith, Vincenzo Mirabello, Stanley W. Botchway, Tony D. James, Sofia I. Pascu

Nanoscale· Volume 11· Issue 19

Abstract

A new supramolecular polysaccharide complex, comprising a functionalised coumarin tag featuring a boronic acid and β-d-glucan (a natural product extract from barley, Hordeum Vulgare) was assembled based on the ability of the boronate motif to specifically recognise and bind to 1,2- or 1,3-diols in water. The complexation ratio of the fluorophore : biopolymer strand was determined from fluorescence titration experiments in aqueous environments and binding isotherms best described this interaction using a 2 : 1 model with estimated association constants of K2:1a1 = 5.0 × 104 M-1 and K2:1a2 = 3.3 × 1011 M-1. The resulting hybrid (denoted 5@β-d-glucan) was evaluated for its cellular uptake as an intact functional biopolymer and its distribution compared to that of the pinacol-protected coumarin boronic acid derivative using two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) in living cells. The new fluorescent β-d-glucan conjugate has a high kinetic stability in aqueous environments with respect to the formation of the free boronic acid derivative compound 5 and retains fluorescence emissive properties both in solution and in living cells, as shown by two-photon fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC). Super-resolution fluorescence imaging using Airyscan detection as well as TM AFM and Raman spectroscopy investigations confirmed the formation of fluorescent and nano-dimensional aggregates of up to 20 nm dimensions which self-assemble on several different inert surfaces, such as borosilicate glass and mica surfaces, and these aggregates can also be observed within living cells with optical imaging techniques. The cytoplasmic distribution of the 5@β-d-glucan complex was demonstrated in several different cancer cell lines (HeLa and PC-3) as well as in healthy cells (J774.2 macrophages and FEK-4). Both new compounds (pinacol protected boronated coumarin) 5-P and its complex hybrid 5@β-d-glucan successfully penetrate cellular membranes with the minimum morphological alterations to cells and distribute evenly in the cytoplasm. The glucan biopolymer retains its activity towards macrophages in the presence of the coumarin tag functionality, demonstrating the potential of this natural β-d-glucan to act as a functional self-assembled theranostic scaffold capable of mediating the delivery of anchored small organic molecules with imaging and drug delivery applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

University of Bath

Bath

UK

University of Texas at Austin

Austin

USA

Central Laser Facility

STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

and Research Complex at Harwell

Didcot

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council · Science and Technology Facilities Council · Medical Research Council · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · University of Bath

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Sarteshnizi · LWT – Food Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 62 · 70410.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.014 ↗
2. Samuelsen · Mol. Nutr. Food Res. · 2014 · 58 · 18310.1002/mnfr.201300338 ↗
3. Pillai · Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. · 2005 · 27 · 29210.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00268_3.x ↗
4. Hwang · Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. · 2018 · 23 · 14410.1007/s12257-018-0003-4 ↗
5. Z. Mirza , E. R.Soto , F.Dikengil , S. M.Levitz and G. R.Ostroff , in Vaccines for Invasive Fungal Infections: Methods and Protocols , ed. M. Kalkum and M. Semis , Springer , New York, New York, NY , 2017 , pp. 143–157
6. Soares · Int. J. Pharm. · 2018 · 535 · 26110.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.009 ↗
7. Soares · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2018 · 131 · 3310.1016/j.ejpb.2018.07.018 ↗
8. Miyoshi · Chem. Biodivers. · 2004 · 1 · 91610.1002/cbdv.200490073 ↗
9. Jalal · Hum. Exp. Toxicol. · 2010 · 30 · 173
10. Guan · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 115110.1039/C5RA19711B ↗
11. Ge · Chem · 2017 · 3 · 43710.1016/j.chempr.2017.06.013 ↗
12. Calatayud · ChemistryOpen · 2018 · 7 · 14410.1002/open.201700184 ↗
13. Sun · Chem. Commun. · 2016 · 52 · 345610.1039/C5CC08633G ↗
14. Chan · J. Hematol. Oncol. · 2009 · 2 · 2510.1186/1756-8722-2-25 ↗
15. Ping · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2016 · 4 · 456510.1039/C6TB01299J ↗
16. Choromanska · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2015 · 80 · 2310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.035 ↗
17. Gu · J. Med. Food · 2005 · 8 · 15410.1089/jmf.2005.8.154 ↗
18. Yoon · Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. · 2013 · 13 · 69910.2174/1871520611313050004 ↗
19. Volpato · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2018 · 119 · 126410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.019 ↗
20. Sedgwick · Chem. Commun. · 2017 · 53 · 1044110.1039/C7CC05872A ↗
21. Sedgwick · Chem. Sci. · 2018 · 9 · 367210.1039/C8SC00733K ↗
22. Sedgwick · Chem. Commun. · 2018 · 54 · 478610.1039/C8CC01661E ↗
23. Wu · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2017 · 46 · 710510.1039/C7CS00240H ↗
24. Tamesue · Chem. Commun. · 2008 · 447810.1039/b808599d ↗
25. Liu · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2018 · 19 · 332310.3390/ijms19113323 ↗
26. Alexander · Cancer Immunol. Immunother. · 2018 · 67 · 173110.1007/s00262-018-2234-9 ↗
27. Sivakumar · Org. Lett. · 2004 · 6 · 460310.1021/ol047955x ↗
28. Li · Chem. Commun. · 2017 · 53 · 1116110.1039/C7CC05166B ↗
29. Xu · Org. Biomol. Chem. · 2015 · 13 · 414310.1039/C4OB02267J ↗
30. Li · Chem. Commun. · 2014 · 50 · 1180610.1039/C4CC03453H ↗
31. Effenberger-Neidnicht · ChemBioChem · 2011 · 12 · 123710.1002/cbic.201000762 ↗
32. Soriano Del Amo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1689310.1021/ja106553e ↗
33. Lippert · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1007810.1021/ja203661j ↗
34. Xuan · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 51 · 228210.1002/anie.201107025 ↗
35. D'Hooge · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 327410.1039/c2ra00542e ↗
36. Waghorn · Chem. Sci. · 2013 · 4 · 143010.1039/c2sc21489j ↗
37. Wu · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 803210.1039/c3cs60148j ↗
38. Wu · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2011 · 17 · 763210.1002/chem.201100033 ↗
39. Elfeky · Chem. – Asian J. · 2010 · 5 · 58110.1002/asia.200900386 ↗
40. Galbraith · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 383110.1039/b926165f ↗
41. Huang · Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 818010.1039/c0cc03099f ↗
42. Fossey · Chem. Rec. · 2012 · 12 · 46410.1002/tcr.201200006 ↗
43. Jabbari-Farouji · J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 06490610.1063/1.4742192 ↗
44. Thordarson · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 130510.1039/C0CS00062K ↗
45. Mao · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 977210.1002/chem.201605232 ↗
46. Hunter · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 748810.1002/anie.200902490 ↗
47. Stephenson-Brown · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 1721310.1039/C5CC04311E ↗
48. Lledos · ChemNanoMat · 2018 · 4 · 36110.1002/cnma.201700378 ↗
49. Mota · Chem. Sci. · 2014 · 5 · 399510.1039/C4SC01785D ↗
50. Rivolta · J. Physiol. Pharmacol. · 2011 · 62 · 45
51. Matsumoto · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2004 · 1670 · 9110.1016/j.bbagen.2003.10.019 ↗
52. Bradley · J. Fluoresc. · 2008 · 18 · 73310.1007/s10895-008-0334-1 ↗
53. Tyson · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 564110.1002/adfm.201601123 ↗
54. Richardson · Z. Naturforsch. · 1978 · 33 · 159210.1515/zna-1978-1227 ↗
55. Kristoffersen · J. Fluoresc. · 2014 · 24 · 101510.1007/s10895-014-1368-1 ↗
56. Shivalingam · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 817810.1038/ncomms9178 ↗
57. Sturala · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 1788210.1021/jacs.7b08570 ↗
58. Noothalapati · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2778910.1038/srep27789 ↗
59. Musa · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2008 · 15 · 266410.2174/092986708786242877 ↗
60. Scrafton · J. Org. Chem. · 2008 · 73 · 287110.1021/jo702584u ↗