journal article·2017

Functional insights into the cellular response triggered by a bile-acid platinum compound conjugated to biocompatible ferric nanoparticles using quantitative proteomic approaches

Paula Díez, María González-Muñoz, María González-González, Rosa Ma Dégano, Ricardo Jara-Acevedo, Sara Sánchez-Paradinas, Rafael Piñol, José Luis Murillo, Gustavo Lou, Fernando Palacio, María Jesús Almendral, Ángel Millán, Emilio Rodríguez-Fernández, Julio J. Criado, Nieves Ibarrola, Manuel Fuentes

Nanoscale· Volume 9· Issue 28
Publisher page

Abstract

At present, bioferrofluids are employed as powerful multifunctional tools for biomedical applications such as drug delivery, among others. The present study explores the cellular response evoked when bile-acid platinum derivatives are conjugated with bioferrofluids by testing the biological activity in osteosarcoma (MG-63) and T-cell leukemia (Jurkat) cells. The aim of this work is to evaluate the biocompatibility of a bile-acid platinum derivative conjugated with multi-functional polymer coated bioferrofluids by observing the effects on the protein expression profiles and in intracellular pathways of nanoparticle-stimulated cells. To this end, a mass spectrometry-based approach termed SILAC has been applied to determine in a high-throughput manner the key proteins involved in the cellular response process (including specific quantitatively identified proteins related to the vesicular transport, cellular structure, cell cycle, biosynthetic process, apoptosis and regulation of the cell cycle). Finally, biocompatibility was evaluated and validated by conventional strategies also (such as flow cytometry, MTT, etc.).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Medicine and General Cytometry Service-Nucleus

Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC/CSIC/USAL/IBSAL)

Salamanca

Spain

Proteomics Unit

ImmunoStep SL

Cancer Research Centre

Department of Analytical Chemistry

Nutrition

and Food Sciences

Faculty of Chemical Sciences

University of Salamanca

Department of Condensed Matter Physics & Materials Research Institute of Aragón

University of Zaragoza

Zaragoza

Department of Inorganic Chemistry

Faculty of Pharmacy

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Johnstone · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 343610.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00597 ↗
2. Sánchez-Paradinas · J. Inorg. Biochem. · 2014 · 131 · 810.1016/j.jinorgbio.2013.10.021 ↗
3. Pérez-Andrés · Dalton Trans. · 2008 · 615910.1039/b807965j ↗
4. Wang · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2015 · 48 · 262210.1021/acs.accounts.5b00203 ↗
5. M. González-Muñoz , P.Díez, M.González-González, R. M.Dégano, N.Ibarrola, A.Orfao and M.Fuentes, InTech, Rijeka, Evaluation strategies of nanomaterials toxicity, 2015
6. Gatoo · BioMed Res. Int. · 2014 · 2014
7. Grant · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2009 · 10 · 59710.1038/nrm2755 ↗
8. Zhou · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 328710.1021/nn305991e ↗
9. Wang · Talanta · 2011 · 84 · 78310.1016/j.talanta.2011.02.020 ↗
10. Kumar · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2011 · 63 · 78910.1016/j.addr.2011.03.008 ↗
11. Jain · Mol. Pharm. · 2005 · 2 · 19410.1021/mp0500014 ↗
12. Amiri · Magn. Reson. Med. · 2011 · 66 · 171510.1002/mrm.22959 ↗
13. Ali · Toxicol. In Vitro · 2015 · 29 · 96210.1016/j.tiv.2015.04.003 ↗
14. Lewinski · Small · 2008 · 4 · 2610.1002/smll.200700595 ↗
15. Bustamante · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 88 · 18440610.1103/PhysRevB.88.184406 ↗
16. Piñol · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 313410.1021/acsnano.5b00059 ↗
17. Chen · Proteomics · 2015 · 15 · 317510.1002/pmic.201500108 ↗
18. Bale · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 149310.1021/nn901586e ↗
19. Zyuzin · Bioconjugate. Chem. · 2017 · 28 · 55610.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00657 ↗
20. Lara · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 188410.1021/acsnano.6b07933 ↗
21. Bertoli · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 1047110.1021/acsnano.6b06411 ↗
22. Lo Giudice · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1347510.1038/ncomms13475 ↗
23. Setchell · Clin. Chim. Acta · 1982 · 125 · 13510.1016/0009-8981(82)90190-5 ↗
24. Deacon · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 1980 · 33 · 22710.1016/S0010-8545(00)80455-5 ↗
25. Sun · J. Mol. Struct. · 2003 · 655 · 32110.1016/S0022-2860(03)00297-7 ↗
26. Criado · Biometals · 1999 · 12 · 28110.1023/A:1009289928944 ↗
27. Li · Methods Mol. Biol. · 2013 · 1077 · 8110.1007/978-1-62703-637-5_6 ↗
28. Shevchenko · Nat. Protoc. · 2006 · 1 · 285610.1038/nprot.2006.468 ↗
29. Rappsilber · Nat. Protoc. · 2007 · 2 · 189610.1038/nprot.2007.261 ↗
30. Olsen · Mol. Cell. Proteomics · 2005 · 4 · 201010.1074/mcp.T500030-MCP200 ↗
31. Perkins · Electrophoresis · 1999 · 20 · 355110.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
32. Brosch · J. Proteome Res. · 2009 · 8 · 317610.1021/pr800982s ↗
33. Dennis · Genome Biol. · 2003 · 4 · P310.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 ↗