Three-dimensional catalyst systems from expanded graphite and metal nanoparticles for electrocatalytic oxidation of liquid fuels
Source abstract
Abstract
Cheap and high-performance electrocatalysts are required for fuel cells. Herein, we present the application of three-dimensional (3D) catalyst systems for electrocatalytic oxidation of formic acid and methanol. These systems consist of cost-effective boron-doped expanded graphite (B-EG) as the support and palladium nanoparticles (NPs) or platinum/palladium bimetal NPs as the catalysts. The characterization of these 3D catalyst systems using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray, and electrochemical techniques reveals that stable and efficient electrocatalytic methanol oxidation, achieved in a 3D catalyst system of B-EG and PdPt bimetal NPs (with a mass ratio of 1 : 1), is due to its big surface area, high conductivity, and an enhanced amount of exposed active sites from bimetal NPs. This price-reduced, stable, and efficient 3D catalyst system is thus promising to be employed for a large scale production of industrial direct methanol fuel cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering
Wuhan Institute of Technology
Wuhan 430073
China
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy
Wuhan University of Science and Technology
Wuhan 430081
Institute of Materials Engineering
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunn · Science · 2011 · 334 · 92810.1126/science.1212741 ↗
2. Serov · Nano Energy · 2015 · 16 · 29310.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.002 ↗
3. Zhao · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 273610.1039/c1ee01307f ↗
4. Mehmood · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 297 · 22410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.094 ↗
5. Kakati · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 1239710.1021/cr400389f ↗
6. B. Zohuri , Small Modular Reactors as Renewable Energy Sources , Springer , Cham , 2019 , 37–5910.1007/978-3-319-92594-3 ↗
7. Wang · IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. · 2008 · 23 · 95710.1109/TEC.2007.914200 ↗
8. Wilberforce · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 1650910.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.057 ↗
9. Serov · Appl. Catal., B · 2009 · 90 · 31310.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.030 ↗
10. Li · Adv. Sci. · 2016 · 3 · 160014010.1002/advs.201600140 ↗
11. Hong · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 291010.1039/C5EE01988E ↗
12. Bian · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2009 · 334 · 5010.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.009 ↗
13. Huang · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 342 · 27310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.054 ↗
14. Li · Carbon · 2018 · 131 · 11110.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.093 ↗
15. Yola · Electroanalysis · 2016 · 28 · 57010.1002/elan.201500381 ↗
16. Bin · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1400110.1039/C5TA02829A ↗
17. Hu · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 209 · 23610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.080 ↗
18. Maksic · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 273 · 72410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.138 ↗
19. Yang · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2016 · 28 · 19210.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.07.021 ↗
20. Pandey · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2159610.1021/jp908239m ↗
21. Zhu · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 242 · 61010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.145 ↗