journal article·2013Open access

Structural and energetic basis for hybridization limits in high-density DNA monolayers

Giovanni Doni, Maryse D. Nkoua Ngavouka, Alessandro Barducci, Pietro Parisse, Alessandro De Vita, Giacinto Scoles, Loredana Casalis, Giovanni M. Pavan

Nanoscale· Volume 5· Issue 20

Abstract

High-density monolayers (HDMs) of single-strand (ss) DNA are important nanoscale platforms for the fabrication of sensors and for mechanistic studies of enzymes on surfaces. Such systems can be used, for example, to monitor gene expression, and for the construction of more complex nanodevices via selective hybridization with the complementary oligos dissolved in solution. In this framework, controlling HDM hybridization is essential to control the final properties. Different studies demonstrate that at the typical density of ≈10(13) molecules per cm(2) no more than ≈30-40% of the HDM ssDNA is successfully hybridized. Until now, however, the origin of the HDM hybridization limit has remained unclear. In this work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of HDM systems with variable hybridization reveal that, independently of other experimental parameters, the effective hybridization for a HDM of this density is intrinsically limited by molecular and electrostatic crowding. A detailed structural analysis of the HDM model shows good agreement with our atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments, and provides further insight into the steric hindrance behaviour and time-resolved surface topography of these nanostructured systems. The explicit relationship proposed between structural crowding and limited HDM hybridization offers a rationale to control the final properties of HDM-based nanodevices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Heller · Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. · 2002 · 12910.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.020702.153438 ↗
2. Herne · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 38 · 891610.1021/ja9719586 ↗
3. Rant · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 44 · 1736410.1073/pnas.0703974104 ↗
4. Rant · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 4 · 129010.1021/nl8026789 ↗
5. Sassolas · Chem. Rev. · 2008 · 108 · 10910.1021/cr0684467 ↗
6. Rosi · Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 105 · 154710.1021/cr030067f ↗
7. Castronovo · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 29710.1038/ncomms1296 ↗
8. Peterson · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2001 · 29 · 516310.1093/nar/29.24.5163 ↗
9. Petrovykh · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 521910.1021/ja029450c ↗
10. Peterlinz · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 340110.1021/ja964326c ↗
11. Steel · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 97510.1016/S0006-3495(00)76351-X ↗
12. Gifford · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 926510.1021/ja103043p ↗
13. Ke · Science · 2008 · 319 · 18010.1126/science.1150082 ↗
14. Niemeyer · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 120010.1002/anie.200904930 ↗
15. Akbulut · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 3010.1039/B915558A ↗
16. Bano · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 261410.1021/nl9008869 ↗
17. Liu · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2000 · 33 · 45710.1021/ar980081s ↗
18. Xu · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 12710.1021/la962029f ↗
19. Xu · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 724410.1021/la9906727 ↗
20. Lund · Nature · 2010 · 465 · 20610.1038/nature09012 ↗
21. Liu · Nature · 2000 · 403 · 17510.1038/35001232 ↗
22. Melli · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 792810.1021/nn202224g ↗
23. Mirmomtaz · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 413410.1021/nl802722k ↗
24. Li · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 24510.1021/nl034958e ↗
25. Sinensky · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 65310.1038/nnano.2007.293 ↗
26. Demers · Anal. Chem. · 2000 · 72 · 553510.1021/ac0006627 ↗
27. Milchev · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 18490510.1063/1.3414996 ↗
28. Bosco · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 173410.1039/c2nr11662f ↗
29. Yao · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 127 · 19510110.1063/1.2786984 ↗
30. Castronovo · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 414010.1021/nl802370g ↗
31. Rai · Langmuir · 2004 · 20 · 313810.1021/la0357256 ↗
32. Hautman · J. Chem. Phys. · 1989 · 91 · 499410.1063/1.457621 ↗
33. Prigodich · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1063810.1021/ja104859j ↗
34. Lee · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 700010.1021/jp300877e ↗
35. Lee · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1594110.1021/jp905469q ↗
36. Ahn · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1066810.1021/jp200447k ↗
37. Saha · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1319310.1021/jp202564m ↗
38. Pinheiro · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 552110.1021/nn301448y ↗
39. Jorgensen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
40. Srinivasan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 940110.1021/ja981844+ ↗
41. Peled · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 858110.1021/jp104533q ↗
42. Peled · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 1184210.1021/la801437n ↗
43. Alexander · J. Phys. · 1977 · 38 · 98310.1051/jphys:01977003808098300 ↗
44. de Gennes · Macromolecules · 1980 · 13 · 106910.1021/ma60077a009 ↗
45. Milner · Macromolecules · 1988 · 21 · 261010.1021/ma00186a051 ↗
46. Misra · Macromolecules · 1989 · 22 · 417310.1021/ma00201a007 ↗
47. Crozier · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 385510.1063/1.1540098 ↗
48. Wolf · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1050310.1021/ja072401l ↗
49. Peterson · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 1460110.1021/ja0279996 ↗